Maryland: CCWer successfully sues individual LEOs for abuse

Status
Not open for further replies.

AZRickD

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
1,684
And the boys in Ohio think CCW will reduce the likelihood of harrassment in Cleveland.

The Story Link
Man, 55, wins suit against police
Five city officers accused of brutality ordered to pay tavern owner $2.5 million
By Kimberly A.C. Wilson Sun Staff
Originally published November 21, 2003

A Baltimore jury awarded a $2.5 million civil verdict yesterday to a man who alleged racism and rough treatment at the hands of police after he was briefly detained in 1998.

In an unusual strategy, the victim, Hopeton Davis, a Jamaican tavern owner, sued only the officers involved in the assault - not the mayor, city and Police Department, as seen typically in brutality lawsuits.

Five Baltimore police officers took Davis into custody Dec. 5, 1998, after a 911 caller reported seeing a man with a handgun in a red truck in the 2300 block of E. Lafayette Ave. He was released after officers confirmed he had a permit for the weapon.

Davis, 55, sued the officers for assault and battery, negligence, false arrest, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress and violation of his civil rights.

On the night of the incident, Davis told jurors, he was sitting in his truck outside Dream Tavern Caribbean in East Baltimore when five officers pulled him out, pushed him to the ground, pulled his arms back and handcuffed him. When he complained that the restraints were too tight, one of the officers made them tighter and another kneed him in the back. Then, Davis said, an officer called him a racial slur as the others bragged about "putting a back breaker" on him.

Davis sought medical treatment for a torn rotator cuff after the incident.

City Solicitor Thurman W. Zollicoffer Jr. said the case sounded like good police work - not brutality.

"From the facts that I'm aware of, I'm not even sure I would characterize it as a brutality case," Zollicoffer said. "Even if you believe that the officers did what they were accused of doing, the verdict is clearly an incredibly, exceptionally large verdict. I think they acted clearly within the scope of their duty and given the backdrop of 200-some murders in this city, I don't think most people would say otherwise."

Three witnesses corroborated the allegations, said Davis' attorney, Norris C. Ramsey. The officers denied that any brutality occurred.

At the end of the four-day trial, the jury took about five hours to find the officers responsible on all counts. It awarded compensatory and punitive damages totaling $500,000 each against Brian A. Biehler, 41, an officer since 1995, now assigned to the Organized Crime Division; Gregg B. Boyd, 35, an Eastern District officer since 1996; Eric M. Mentzer, 46, an Eastern District officer since 1989; George M. Clinedist III, 32, an officer assigned to the Southeastern District, on the force since 1994; and Jeffrey G. Hitaffer, who left the department.

Matt Jablow, a police spokesman, said all five of the officers were charged by the city police internal affairs unit with excessive force. Internal affairs officials later sustained the charges against all except Hitaffer, Jablow said, and they were required to undergo counseling.

Ramsey, who specializes in civil rights law, said he made a strategic decision not to sue "the usual suspects" - the mayor, city and Police Department.

"That avoided the quagmire of witnesses and expenses in proving the Police Department was negligent in the training of its officers," Ramsey said. "It was just easier to sue the officers."

Zollicoffer said the officers' attorney, Troy A. Priest, will file motions at a hearing Jan. 7 to set aside the verdict or have it reduced to the statutory civil cap of $350,000. Priest did not return calls last night.
 
Brutality or not, 2.5 million dollars is a bit much for getting kneed in the back and being called a name. If it was me, I would have settled for an official apology and a gift certificate to Applebee's. Of course, I'm not one to turn down a couple million dollars either! :)

Zollicoffer said the officers' attorney, Troy A. Priest, will file motions at a hearing Jan. 7 to set aside the verdict or have it reduced to the statutory civil cap of $350,000
So there is a cap, but jury's just get to ignore it?
 
What was he doing with the weapon that prompted the 911 call??? Interesting that the article doesn't give you that information.
 
Five Baltimore police officers took Davis into custody Dec. 5, 1998, after a 911 caller reported seeing a man with a handgun in a red truck in the 2300 block of E. Lafayette Ave. He was released after officers confirmed he had a permit for the weapon.

Steve

Davis was doing something really bad, he was black man legally carrying a gun in his pick up.:rolleyes:
 
yeah, there's some facts missing here--how did someone know he had a gun? Does Baltimore allow open carry? In short, how did the caller know he had a gun?

And--TheOtherOne: It looks to me like this is not an award for being kneed in the back and being called a name--it was for injuries done to this guy--the torn rotator cuff is specifically cited.

I don't happen to think that is worth two-and-a-half million when combined with the brutality aspects, but as one who has a "sore shoulder" (bone spur, arthritis, probably tendenitis, and rotator damage/inflamation) sufficient to seek another carry holster (I preferred SOB; here I come, Don Johnson), I can tell you I would be in unspeakable agony if I were cuffed behind my back--enough so that the thought of punitive damages would be appealing once I reflected on what had just been done to me--i.e., as a LAC.

OTOH, I am curious about other facts--like the attitude when he was approached/'queried' by the officers.
 
Last edited:
Well good for him. It's about time various public servants get nailed personally for doing bad things.

I wonder if you can sue LEOs for enforcing unpopular laws. Technically, I mean. I know you can pretty much sue anyone for anything, but you open yourself up to a world of hurt if it is frivolous and you lose. But, I know that in civil cases, you only need a 'more likely than not' standard than a 'beyond reasonable doubt' standard like in criminal law. If a LEO enforces, say, a marijuana law, and you sue that officer for enforcing that law, and the general population is about 80% in favor of decriminalization, you'd have a good chance of winning a civil suit.
 
Let's see. He violated no law. Three witnesses corroborate the man's testimony. The cops throw him down, threaten him, *damage* his shoulder, have jury find for him, and you are wondering what *he* did wrong?
City Solicitor Thurman W. Zollicoffer Jr. said the case sounded like good police work - not brutality.
Interesting bit of cop-apologist activity here on TheHighRoad. Which one of you is Zollicoffer?

Rick
 
Soon he'll own their houses. Let's hope their retirement funds are safe from attachment.
 
Sounds like pretty heavy handed tactics to me. While I'm all for "officer safety issues" it does seem like a use of exsessive force.

If the officers were that worried about the situation, they should have executed a felony stop. If the suspect complies, there is no reason to hurt the guy. One has to be very very careful with a suspect once he is cuffed, anything that happens after that is susbject to scrutiny if there is injury involved.

The fact that he was hurt after the fact, they used racial slurs, and the fact that he had a legal permit put the officers involved in a less than ideal situation. No a good idea when it goes to a jury,as evidenced bt the results.


Matt Jablow, a police spokesman, said all five of the officers were charged by the city police internal affairs unit with excessive force. Internal affairs officials later sustained the charges against all except Hitaffer, Jablow said, and they were required to undergo counseling.

That will not look good at the appeal. Had the IA found the charges unfounded, they would have had a better chance at the next hearing.


Then theres this tidbit from someone that dont matter...
From the facts that I'm aware of, I'm not even sure I would characterize it as a brutality case," Zollicoffer said. "Even if you believe that the officers did what they were accused of doing, the verdict is clearly an incredibly, exceptionally large verdict. I think they acted clearly within the scope of their duty and given the backdrop of 200-some murders in this city, I don't think most people would say otherwise."

Flawed logic. Neither the judge or the jury cares about the 200-some murders that occure. This man had nothing to do with them, it is irrevelent.That could be the very reason that the man carried in the first place. I tend to think that the race card was played on this one and the officers got caught.
 
yeah, there's some facts missing here--how did someone know he had a gun? Does Baltimore allow open carry? In short, how did the caller know he had a gun?

Although we don't know for certain, it is entirely possible that he reholstered or stapped on his carry weapon after leaving the tavern. I think many of us have done exactly the same thing after leaving a restriced area such as a courthouse. And no matter how discreet or careful you are, there is always the chance of you being noticed and having the police called on you.

The Law Enforcement community has no room for unprofessional behavior or police brutality. The public does not have any tolerance as well. The jury decision seems to support this.

I don't feel sorry for the "Officers". I feel sorry for their families if they have to suffer because of their actions.

Good Shooting
Red
 
what are the issues

for LEOs to have individual protection. Given the axiom that lawyers follow the money, I have to believe the individual officers have/can have individual liability coverage through their union, and that this liability would be covered by that coverage.

Who knows the "usual" coverage available for them, particularly if the normal suit for liability by the employer is not involved?
 
From the article, I think the plantiff owns the location this occured at a ("Jamaican tavern owner" and the location was "Dream Tavern Caribbean"). Business owners can get a CCW permit for when they transport money to/from the bank.

Open carry is NOT legal in Maryland. I bet someone saw him printing when he got into the vehicle and called the cops (most dont realize that it is possible to get a permit in MD if you're a business owner that deals in cash).

Kharn
 
Well, assuming the amount isn't knocked down in appeal, I figure that if the LEO's dont have insurance, they'll probably have to liquidate their assets, and then have their wages garnished for a good long time.
 
Taking the story at face value, lets review:
. . . all five of the officers were charged by the city police internal affairs unit with excessive force. Internal affairs officials later sustained the charges against all except Hitaffer.
Three witnesses corroborated the allegations,
A Baltimore jury awarded a $2.5 million civil verdict
He was released after officers confirmed he had a permit for the weapon.
I pass up more cop-bashing threads than I enter, but in this case we see that IA sustains the charges, witnesses sustain the charges, a jury finds for the victim, the victim is injured (torn rotator cuff), the cops who rough him up can't charge him with anything, and we get
Let's hope their retirement funds are safe from attachment.
Let's not, instead. Bums like these five uniformed thugs abusing people under color of authority serve only to hurt the reputation of all LEOs. They deserve to have the full weight of the law come down on them.
 
A torn rotator cuff is painfull. I don't think they heal on thier own. I believe surgury is required. If I'm wrong please correct me as I'm not a doctor.......nor do I play one on TV. ;)
 
"Steve

Davis was doing something really bad, he was black man legally carrying a gun in his pick up."

Oh yeah.......I'm sure the 911 caller used his/her x-ray vision to see the gun inside the car. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Aside from the brutality aspect, authorities here are constantly chirping about "citizen involvement" in law enforcement (i.e. call us to report suspicious activity, but do nothing else about it) so if someone saw a man in an inner city neighborhood with a gun, they might call the cops.

The concept of CCW is NOT one that has any kind of foothold here in MD.

Man with gun = bad guy
 
They have a record of the 911 caller.

I'd go after that person as well. It wouldn't go very far, but it would be worth it if s/he got an upset stomach for a good week waiting for the legalities to clear. And her/his name in the paper would be worth the effort.

Time to make these sheeple pay for their idiocy :banghead:

Also, I have gotten some e-mails from Maryland cop/gunnies who say that Maryland LEOs are generally clueless as to the availability of CCW permits for we peons.

Rick
 
Just speculation on my part, but a black guy with CCW in Baltimore is a probably a pretty rare bird, and probably 'connected' politically. JMO, but I think the ossifers coulda/should handled it better. No such thing as a free eddycashun . . .:rolleyes:
 
The fact is, the Baltimore police are not to be trusted. They are as corrupt and heavy handed as most any in the US. And they most certainly do not like citizens, in particular black citizens, to have guns. I am surprised he got off with just a torn rotator cuff.

By the way, I think it is an excellent strategy to go after the officers rather than the department. If they can't count on the department for protection, it will make them think a little next time before they get heavy handed. Police officers (my brother is one, incidentally) are vested with a considerable amount of power, but they need to learn that there are consequences for irresponsible use of that power.
 
In the few dealings I've had with Baltimore police I've found them to be extremely professional and courteous. With one big caveat. They have to be the same race as you. In Baltimore black cops are not the biggest fans of white citizens and vice versa.

Anyway, as for MD permits, business owners who deal in large amounts of cash can often get one (at least a limited permit). However, I am pretty sure it is not a concealed carry permit. I am pretty sure it simply allows carry. Many non-shall issue states assume that few people will get permits so there aren't that many restrictions on permits. When they pass shall issue laws is usually when they add restrictions on where you can carry and that require that the gun stays concealed. My guess is that the guy wasn't concealed, or took the gun out of the holster while in his truck so that is why people noticed his gun.

As for the award...He was doing nothing wrong (the fact that he wasn't charged or arrested seems to suggest that), when he complained that the cuffs were too tight they (the cops) tightened them, kneed him in the back and made a comment on top of it, and he had to be treated for a torn rotator cuff all pretty much suggest that the jury made the right choice. The torn rotator, the tightening of the cuffs, the knee in the back, the IA charges all tell me that the cops used excessive force.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top