Deavis
Member
Sweet! New York v. FOPA!
story may not be true.
This is a follow up on the story - the body guard was not working for Moore:
http://moorewatch.com/index.php/weblog/correction_to_moores_bodyguard_story/
So we now know that Burk works for a bodyguard company.If you believe Patrick Burk was ever assigned to protect Michael Moore, or any number of other public figures, you might accurately report that “A bodyguard who was once assigned to protect Michael Moore...â€
You could as accurately say “A bodyguard that was once assigned to protect President Clinton,†because Patrick Burk has also been assigned to protect President Clinton in the past - but you wouldn’t be accurate if you said “President Clinton’s Bodyguard.â€
Patrick Burk is not Michael Moore’s bodyguard, nor was he protecting Michael Moore or in any way involved with Michael Moore on Wednesday night, when he (Burk) was checking in at JFK for a flight to Los Angeles.
It seems that 'public servants' increasingly believe and act as though none of us are decent humans. We're all rock dwellers with something to hide.Seems that NY state is severely messed up, and at least some of its "public servants" are quite literally mortal enemies of decent humans.
This can be a true statement even if he was MM's BG for years, as in "He is NOT MM's BG NOW, and Burk is employed by US, and therefore NEVER by MM." Very easy for MM to slink out of this on technicalities.Brother, you get what you want to get, that much is clear. Just because the article says,
"Patrick Burk is not Michael Moore’s bodyguard, and has never been employed by Michael Moore."
Well, it's nice to see how strongly you support your country's troops. Really, you should be ashamed of yourself. Hoo-ah, get a shave you fat bloated swines!
LOL! That's the best thing I've read all day!Even if he is Michael Moore's body guard, I absolutely support his right to have a gun. Heck, look at the crowd he hangs out with.