midrange 338 scope?

Status
Not open for further replies.

alaskan9974

Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
67
The scope I have on my 338 stopped working in cold weather, it turns but does not turn the crosshairs. I am looking for one with decent glass and at least 14x and 50+mm, any leads? Would rather stay midrange in price
 
What is " midrange " to you ? Since scopes start at less than $100 and go to easily $4000 midrange would be about 2 grand. Mid range to me is 3-5 hundred. Several Leupolds and Nikons would fit the bill. Never had an issue with either brand when new in the box.
 
I am considering a NF NXS First focal plane or finding a used USO SN-3, I hunt out to 400 and target shoot out 1000yd.
 
I'd seriously look into a 3-9X40 instead, especially on a budget. You'll get better quality for half the money. I'd take a high quality 3-9X40 over a cheap 4-14x50 any day. Especially on a heavy recoiling rifle. And a 4-14X50 of the same quality will be twice as much money. Another thing to consider, the heavier the scope, and the higher it is mounted magnify the effects of recoil. A 338's recoil is going to be harder on bigger heavier scopes. Those scopes are designed for low recoiling varmint rifles.

A 14X scope is meant for varmint hunters who need to hit small targets at 400-500 yards or target shooting, not big game hunting. A scope on 9X is enough magnification to hit any big game animal out to at least 700 yards.

In theory a 50mm lense is better in low light, but not usually in practice. The scopes magnification combined with objective size determine the diameter of a beam of light that exits the rear objective to the eye. Simply divide the objective size by the magnification. A 50mm scope set on 10X lets in a 5mm diameter beam of light. For most human eyes 5mm is as much as can used. If it is less than 5mm then the scope will not work well in poor light. Greater than 5mm rarely helps since it is wasted light the human eye can't use.

A 40mm scope set on 8X lets in exactly the same amount of light as a 50mm scope set on 10X. At any magnification less than 8X or 10X both scopes provide more light than the human eye can use. Above 8X or 10X both scopes perform poorly in low light. So for double the money a 50mm scope works slightly better than a 40mm scope, but only when set on 9X. Any more or less magnification and you get the same results.

And that ASSUMES equal quality. If you buy a scope with better quality glass the image will be clearer and sharper even though the beam of light is smaller. At about $200 the Burris FF-II has earned a reputation for ruggedness and decent quality. That is the least expensive scope I'd put on your rifle. For slightly more a Leupold VX-1 should work. You can move up to the $300-$350 VX2 and get a little better quality glass, but the VX1 is just as durable.
 
A 14X scope is meant for varmint hunters who need to hit small targets at 400-500 yards or target shooting, not big game hunting. A scope on 9X is enough magnification to hit any big game animal out to at least 700 yards.
For slightly more a Leupold VX-1 should work. You can move up to the $300-$350 VX2 and get a little better quality glass, but the VX1 is just as durable.
actually the VX-1 would be a lot less $170ish on the web all shipping and taxes. I have 2 one on a 308 one on a 22 mag 3-9x40's couldn't be happier with the price/quality ratio. in fact a VX-3i can be had around 350ish depending on model
 
Last edited:
Personal opinion would be a Leupold VX-2 or the VX-3i. Someone already suggested it and would be the ones I looked at as well.
 
Read JMR40's post. His post lays it out well. I have used the .338 Mag. for years. I am not sure about many things. But putting inexpensive scopes on the .338 is a waste of time. The recoil eats cheap scopes.The 14X power target scope has a narrow field and difficult to hold on game targets. Buy a quality 3X9X40.:)
 
Read JMR40's post. His post lays it out well. I have used the .338 Mag. for years. I am not sure about many things. But putting inexpensive scopes on the .338 is a waste of time. The recoil eats cheap scopes.The 14X power target scope has a narrow field and difficult to hold on game targets. Buy a quality 3X9X40.:)

Which recommended scope are you calling inexpensive and such worthless?
 
I think the Leupold line is a safe bet. I have had excellent results with Leupold warranty work. The budget scopes are not worthless. They may not be constructed to handle the .338 recoil. There are a number of good scopes in the price range of Leupold.:thumbup:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top