For everyone recommending a turret press based on current usage, have you considered the amount he shoots will likely increase due to lower cost ammo and a growing firearms collection in the future? The cheapest, bare-minimum solution is not always the best choice for everyone especially if minimum setup cost is not number 1,2, and 3 on his priority list. I've been there and can understand striving for the minimum investment; it was the only way I could start reloading and practicing more when younger.
However, there is another theory based on good reloading equipment holding its' value and the goal is maximizing enjoyment of the reloading process by choosing better equipment up front. It ties up more money, but much of that can be returned by selling the equipment later. The person has enjoyed the reloading process so much more that it was worth the lost interest income or opportunity to purchase something else during that time. I'm not saying reloading equipment is a great financial investment, but looking at the situation as a controlled loss over time opens some interesting options. Think of it as a lease cost.
As an example, I recently purchased an electric case feeder for my progressive press. I don't really need the extra loading speed it allows. It does make reloading easier and it is more relaxing for loading ammo at the same rate as before (about 500 per hour). All I have to do now is place a bullet and pull the handle each time. It's nice not having to coordinate handling cases and bullets with the same hand. It is a luxury item, but one that's worth it in my opinion and situation. If I want to load faster or higher quantity, it's ready. If I want to slow down to 400 an hour and not break a sweat, it works for that also.
The minimal investment strategy isn't always the best for everyone. I think that is forgotten at times. 250 rounds an hour from a turret press is work and doesn't allow slowing down for anything. That's 1000 handle strokes an hour (using 4 dies) for 250 rounds vs. 500 handle strokes an hour for 500 rounds; double the work for half the output. Now think about doing it for 10 years then decide what is the best approach.