NAA Mini vs knife

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good!

BTW, HAVE you shot a NAA revolver?

erm...um...no. :uhoh:

But your description is roughly in line with what I expect/expected. I think there's hugely increased risk of accidentally shooting your fingers off if you don't practice a lot with it. I have a hard time imagining a scenario where carry of an NAA would be feasible when carry of at least a reasonably-small and serviceable handgun wouldn't.
 
I have a hard time imagining a scenario where carry of an NAA would be feasible when carry of at least a reasonably-small and serviceable handgun wouldn't.

i don't understand this statement.......are you sayin' a NAA not a reasonably weapon?...i carry mine everywhere aloud by law...
 
g, have you ever tried carrying a larger gun? I guess if all I had available was an NAA I would carry it and practice with it, but I am about 6'1, 185-190, and in non-baggy jeans and a t-shirt I can easily conceal a Glock 19. I mean so easily, I've considered getting the next size up (G17).

I can even carry it reasonably concealed in running shorts and a t-shirt with a belly band...I can even conceal a fixed-blade and a spare mag with this set-up.

What I'm saying is, if you are allowed to carry (which you are), and you choose to (which you do), I can't imagine why you would carry an NAA and nothing else. Maybe you could share your reasoning.

Or maybe you carry it as a backup which would make a bit more sense I suppose.
 
[QUOTEg, have you ever tried carrying a larger gun?][/QUOTE]

i carry a 3" 1911 and 5" 1911 when i where pants......i where bid overalls 95% of the time....i have not found a holster that works with bids......1911 rides in the truck and NAA in my right pocket.....i see it i have 5 shots to get to the truck thats if i need the 1911.....the NAA is like you have a big pocket knife in your pocket as i have tried to carry a S&W 37 and a Mustang but they are just to big for my pockets......so i shoot the NAA everytime i shoot so i'm happy with the way i use the gun...
 
Part 1

I've got to get a run in before I go back to work, so I'll end my response with this for now.

I've been following this thread for a while, and I think I'm ready to chime in.

If my post sounds condescending or anything, it's not supposed to be. I'm not really trying to change anyone's mind with this one, just explaining my own, personal thoughts on the subject.

I think that this might be one of those questions with a two part answer: It Depends, and Do what works best for you.

IF we accept mindset-skillset-toolset, then a lot of this depends on you. I have a friend who would prefer having to use a knife over a gun. This makes sense: He's been into Kung Fu for a long time, and could probably do some real damage with a blade. I never got past Orange belt in Karate six or seven years ago, and within the past two years, did Aikedo for about 6 weeks. Thats the extent of my "training" that is applicable to using a knife in self defense. I know that my skill with a firearm, although not as good as some posters on this site, is much, much better than my skill with a knife.

What about training? I would love to find a martial art that will teach me use of a knife, but I don't have the time available, or the money, to go to classes every week for years. With firearms, I've found that training classes are usually done over the course of a couple days, and then you practice your skills on your own time.

I can practice shooting with myself, or with others. I've learned a lot from classes, shooting matches, and just practicing on my own.

When it comes to the knife, it seems to me I'd need to train with someone, because it seems to me that force on force training is more important with a knife than it is with a gun.

I know how to use a gun, because its easier for me to find someone to teach me how to use a gun, as apposed to someone who can teach me how to use a knife.

I'm not saying there are not knife trainers out there, just that I can not find very many in my neck of the woods ( I found one training course, and I'm seeing if I can get into it, but other than that, the pickings are fairly slim.) Yes, I know Shivworks travels, but they seem to like to hold the West Coast classes in California. The closest training they offer in a state where I can carry is in Texas... in May.

Everyone saying that a determined attacker can close the distance quickly and cut me are right. But if I can get just ONE .22 caliber hole in him Before he gets that close, before I have to resort to a method of self defense that I have little to no training in, before I'm relying on my physical strength and speed, well, it may not make it an even fight, but I'll take it. If I can get the gun out before he closes the distance, that's an edge I'll take.

Even though I don't have any training with a knife, that's not going to stop me from using it if an attacker gets too close.

I guess my mindset is, why would you limit your toolset?
 
I've got to get a run in before I go back to work, so I'll end my response with this for now.

I've been following this thread for a while, and I think I'm ready to chime in.

If my post sounds condescending or anything, it's not supposed to be. I'm not really trying to change anyone's mind with this one, just explaining my own, personal thoughts on the subject.

I think that this might be one of those questions with a two part answer: It Depends, and Do what works best for you.

...


I thought everything you said was extremely well-stated and reasoned!
good3.gif


...Will look forward to Part 2...


.
 
Part 2

J-Frame, thanks for the support. I had a few fiasco s to handle at work last night, so the kind words are much appreciated. On the plus side, I think I found someone who can cover one of my shifts, so I can attend the knife training in January. I'll let y'all know how that goes. (Its the InSights Folding Knife course, hopefully I'll see some of you there. And hopefully I'll stop hijacking this thread......)

Anyways.....

Once again, if this sounds condescending, or you feel like I'm talking to you like you're a little kid, I'm not, its just the lack of tone, and the lack of sleep (hurray for a 50+ hour work week!)



I've been thinking about the NAA Mini-Revolver vs Knife again...

I have a hard time imagining a scenario where carry of an NAA would be feasible when carry of at least a reasonably-small and serviceable handgun wouldn't.

I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, but by "reasonably small and serviceable," I'm assuming you're referring to something along the lines of an LCP, TCP, P238 or similar .380 pistol. The last time I had to wear a suit, I carried my LCP in a pocket holster, front pants pocket. Worked really well as I was walking, but it left me with one question: How do you draw from a pocket holster while your sitting in your car?

I tried putting it in my inside jacket pocket, because at that time, I usually carried a J-Frame in my inside jacket pocket.... for the jacket that I normally wear. The sport-coat pockets where considerably shallower, and the gun didn't really fit very well, which I'm using as a euphemism for "fell out while I was running trying to catch the ferry."

The gun I'm aware of, that would have fit in that pocket well, is an NAA Mini. That's not the only gun I'd carry; there would be an LCP or a J-Frame somewhere, maybe even a 9mm in a messenger bag, but in that pocket, the one that works like a shoulder holster, the one I can draw from while sitting down with my seat belt on, I think a Mini would fit the bill. Could I have clipped a knife in that pocket? Absolutely. But I'm not used to reaching there for a knife. I'm used to going for the top of my pocket where it is clipped in. And I'm not sure how well I'd be able to use a knife while sitting in my car. Unless the BadGuy is leaning in my window, its hard for me to think of a way to use it that doesn't involve dangling my out my window, which in my humble opinion, is not a very effective, or safe position to fight from.

Now, part of this plays into tactics and mindset. Some may argue that if you're in your car, and the BadGuy is outside your car, you don't need to fight, at least not right away, because you're in your car, and therefore you are safe. I disagree, because I don't see a car as being safe. I don't see a car as cover. I see it as partial concealment, that may provide a barrier between you and an attacker, but the attacker can overcome the barrier by either breaking a window, opening the door, or shooting at you. I only consider the engine block to be cover, and maybe behind the axle/wheel. Otherwise, I'm not a big fan of fighting from a car. If its moving, if you can get it in gear, that's one thing. But if it isn't moving, your strapped down (at least initially) in a position that hinders any weapon that relies on your physical strength, in a confined space, with blind spots, and when you get shot at, the bullet may be bringing parts of the car in the form of shrapnel with it. In that situation, I'd take just about any gun, before I choose a knife.

But that's just me.

I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people reading this are wondering how much experience I have with a Mini. None, never fired one. But I do have an old, old Whitneyville Armory .22 that my great grandfather carried as his backup gun when he was a cop in San Francisco. The gun is not in working condition, but I've dry fired it, and let me tell you, pulling that hammer back is a pain. You have to pull it back farther than it feels like you should, and its a heavy pull, but even so, I think I could do it if I had too. At the risk of sounding abrasive, I don't care what you think I can and can not do, but if you think that YOU can not do it, then maybe you're right, and maybe the Mini is not the gun that you should be carrying. There's any easy way to find out: Go mountain biking, take a Wilderness First Responder Class, do some force-on-force training, go for a drive in the snow, trail running at night, or something that activates the flight-or-fight response, and see how well you can perform tasks under pressure. You might surprise yourself. Or you may decide that I give absolutely terrible suggestions, YMMV.

One of the complaints I'm seeing against the Mini is that when you shoot your one cylinder, you're done. Obviously, all guns go empty eventually (does not apply to Mr. Cruise, Mr. Connery, Mr. Willis, or Mr. Ford.) but I agree, the Mini looks like a real pain to reload. I mean, I guess you could use some glue or tape to secure cartridges in a spare cylinder and carry that. Yea, you'd be sacrificing a cylinder, but you're gaining a reload, and it might be worth it. Its possible that even then, a reload is not feasible, which I agree is almost never a good thing... but then people are complaining about not being able to hit people with it once its empty, and since knives never go empty, knives are therefore better. There's a logic to that, and there's a definitely a difference between a mini and a Hi-Point .45 in terms of impact weapon effectiveness.
One of the concepts that we have to work with a lot is compromise; power vs recoil, capacity vs caliber, small and concealable vs large and better performance. Here, the compromise is a gun that's harder to use, and can't be used as an impact weapon, but is easier to conceal than just about anything on the market that I'm aware of.
If we go back to the Hierarchy (Mindset-Skillset-Toolset) then the ability for the gun to double as an impact weapon (toolset) isn't as important as our mindset. In this case, my mindset would be something to the effect of: If the gun is empty, its less effective than a knife or my hands. So if the gun goes empty, instead of trying to hit the BadGuy with it, I'm going to re-holster, and either draw my knife, or my mini-maglight, or use my hands.

Again, that's just me.

Like many things, there is no one right answer. Which is better? If you're strapped into the drivers seat, probably the Mini. If you're on the ground, with a furry four legged critter crushing your arm in its jaws, well, I don't know about you guys, but I think it would be too easy to accidentally hit my own hand, especially with a mini where, shot placement being critical, would require a head shot, which is the part of the animal where your hand is. In that case, yea, I'll take a knife over a mini. At an active shooter situation, well, either way you brought the wrong tool for the job.

I would carry both.

Another consideration is the physical ability of the user. I have mostly slow twitch muscle fibers, which is a fancy way of saying that my muscles can't move that fast, but I have a lot of endurance. I'm not like those quick guys who can reach out and catch a ball in the blink of an eye. For me, I feel like I can't use a knife quickly enough to make it very effective at 1 to 5 feet, and I'd rather rely on a gun, which uses that same drawing motion, that same trigger pull, that I've done hundreds, if not thousands of times. At contact distance, where he can barely see my hands and can't really block them very well, I think a knife would be a fantastic tool.

At the end of the day, no one wants to leak, and I just want to get home in one piece. A carrier criminal who has been shot at before may not be too impressed with your NAA mini. The same could be said for someone who's been stabbed. I don't think that means they want to leak, just that they feel they can get you before you get them. If you're holding a knife, they may think they can overpower you. If you point a Mini at them, they may think they can overpower you. They may think, either way, that you may not be willing to fight back. If you shoot them with a mini, they know you will fight back. My life isn't just worth fighting for, its worth fighting dirty for. If that means using a gun to engage the BadGuy before they close the distance, then that's what I'm going to do.

The knife is a multipurpose tool, and excels at many things, but shooting isn't one of them. Remember, the pro's of one are not necessarily cons of the other. The extended range of a revolver doesn't make the knife any less effective. No matter how much faith you may put in a knife, or how much range time you have into your mini, neither are good reasons to carry just one.

If you normally carry a knife and a .38Special, is there any reason why if you couldn't carry the .38, you'd carry just a knife instead of a knife and a .22?


Have a good one guys,

Chris "the Kayak-Man" Johnson
 
Yep! On purpose, I haven't opinionated on my views of an NAA revolver as CCW. That's up to the individual. The OP was simply a hypothetical comparison of that handgun vs. a knife. I KNOW what my elapsed time (and split time) is from a "surprise" tone to COM hit with my pistol out of my concealed holster. I think that's something everyone should practice & know. I've also witnessed a well-seasoned SA Colt (Ruger) pistolero match my best times, so cocking that hammer doesn't slow ya' down much. IMHO, it's not a SA issue. It's just when you combine; a marginal caliber, with a tiny revolver, that takes a more complicated procedure (than a DA revolver or an autoloader) to get into the fight...against a knife, in a high-speed, ultra high-stress circumstance? I'm either gonna' want to be carrying a faster-to-deploy, more-power handgun OR I want to be the guy with the knife.

And conwict, Thanks for your honesty about actually experiencing a NAA revolver. Nice to know I'm yackin' with (pardon the pun) Straight Shooter! ;)
 
Quote Unquote

Just ran across this quote by Mark Twain, which amused me enough to add to this discussion...

I was armed to the teeth with a pitiful little Smith & Wesson's seven-shooter [.22 rimfire], which carried a ball like a homeopathic pill, and it took the whole seven to make a dose for an adult. But I thought it was grand. It appeared to me to be a dangerous weapon. It only had one fault -- you could not hit anything with it. One of our 'conductors' practiced awhile on a cow with it, and as long as she stood still and behaved herself she was safe . . .

[quoted in R. L. Wilson, The Peacemakers, p. 143]
 
NMGonzo said:
I rather have a rapier.

Make mine a gladius (Mainz if given a choice) and throw in some lorica segmentata (corbridge A works), scutum and lobster-style galea (Gallic H) and a week's worth of body odor. If they're still coming at me, there's got to be mental illness involved... and not just on my part.

Seriously though, if someone is skilled with a knife, it could very possibly serve them better (IMO) than a NAA revolver.
Having worked several years in a hospital situated in an area with a large Hispanic population, I've learned a few things. One of those things is that Mexicans certainly like their knives and in the hands of someone semi-skilled (or furious), knives can create some horrifically gruesome lacerations resulting in a nightmarish amount of blood loss.

However, I do believe it's possible someone may be better served with "five-for-sure" of .22LR or .22WMR from an NAA if they're not physically able to put a knife to use effectively and here's my reasoning:

The sight of a knife in one's hand might initially discourage a drunken dimwit more than the tiny NAA revolver before the NAA does any barking.

On the flip-side, the NAA may provide a more sobering effect after round one at melee range. Those familiar with the blast/flash/report of a .22WMR or hypersonic .22LR from a 1 1/8" barrel may know where I'm coming from.

It's a good question and in many cases a toss-up. I'd rather grip my Benchmade 910 over an NAA if the balloon went up while my pants were down. On the flip side, I'd rather my wife have an NAA over a knife. It's all subjective, I suppose.
 
Just ran across this quote by Mark Twain, which amused me enough to add to this discussion...

I was armed to the teeth with a pitiful little Smith & Wesson's seven-shooter [.22 rimfire], which carried a ball like a homeopathic pill, and it took the whole seven to make a dose for an adult. But I thought it was grand. It appeared to me to be a dangerous weapon. It only had one fault -- you could not hit anything with it. One of our 'conductors' practiced awhile on a cow with it, and as long as she stood still and behaved herself she was safe . . .

[quoted in R. L. Wilson, The Peacemakers, p. 143]


That is certainly an amusing quote by the master of amusing quotes... :)

I also remember reading a letter from a Union soldier who had a S&W Model 1 in .22 short. The letter was written to the S&W company, and enclosed something like three dollars. He explained that he had a broken spring in the revolver -- that the revolver was serving him well in the war, and he would appreciate it if the company could make sure he receives a replacement spring.


.
 
Given the weight, size and restricted caliber and barrel length; I think I would be far better served with a knife in most every situation.
 
The small guns were feared in the times before antibiotics as a tiny wound could do you in. The round carried infectious crap inside you and that was that in quite a few cases.

So you avoid being shot by them.
 
The small guns were feared in the times before antibiotics as a tiny wound could do you in. The round carried infectious crap inside you and that was that in quite a few cases.

So you avoid being shot by them.

So now that we have antibiotics people don't care about being shot by a .22? Interesting theory. I wonder if you could find a single volunteer to prove your theory.
 
If someone pulls a small revolver out I am more likely to "stand and deliver" lethal force fire, than I am compared to someone wielding a shotgun pointed directly at me. There are degrees of aversion to being shot.
 
Yeah, people are less likely to argue when the hole in the end facing them is big enough to fit your thumb in. :evil:
 
If someone pulls a small revolver out I am more likely to "stand and deliver" lethal force fire, than I am compared to someone wielding a shotgun pointed directly at me. There are degrees of aversion to being shot.

Maybe. But that sure as heck won't be because of antibiotics. Wow, this thread sure has outlived its usefulness. If it ever had any.
 
2WheelsGood said:
Maybe. But that sure as heck won't be because of antibiotics. Wow, this thread sure has outlived its usefulness. If it ever had any.

Can't disagree with the latter part of the statement but modern medical care and the related increase in gunshot survivability is bound to be a factor in many people's decision making. I have personally had formal instruction where the instructor discussed that handgun wounds are about 98% survivable in his area (Memphis, Tn).

I think it's appropriate to infer that if handgun wounds were only 10% survivable it would be appropriate to base our tactics and mindset off of that figure.
 
I own, train with, and carry a NAA mini as primary.

I would not want to face an attacker who knew how to use either knife or mini. Either can be quite formidable in the right hands.

But if I was facing an inexperienced attacker, I'd rather face the mini. The rookie knifer still knows he has to stab or slash. The rookie mini gunner will likely have a problem in deployment or accuracy.
 
When the situation requires me to be discreet and my wardrobe is in line with the ocasion, the NAA is my Primary.

Otherwise, my J-frame keeps me company pushing the NAA into secondary status.

The most important thing is that it is on me. Always.

-Jake
 
Why a mini as primary?

Because I like steel-framed guns and the large ones are heavy, so I carry a small one.

Because it's hot in Florida 10 months out of the year.

Because I wouldn't want to try to mug me.

Because I can put all 5 into an eyeball from 15 feet.

Because I can practice all day using the .22lr cylinder without a range trip.
 
But how well can you do with it at belt buckle to belt buckle range, while involved in a struggle with an attacker?

Or is that in the Not Gonna Happen To Me category, thanks to flawless situational awareness?
 
I can't believe this thread is still going on. Bring a knife to a gunfight....duh........chris3
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top