I realize this is the Federal Government we are talking about, but what bean counter would buy off on it being cheaper to buy 250 new Springfield Professionals (or Les Baer customs) than simply tune up the triggers on pistols they already owned. I suspect there was another reason.johnmcl wrote,
The business case was that gunsmithing 250 individual BHPs to an acceptable trigger status was considerably more expensive in time and money than going to another gun.
I suspect there was another reason.
Much more plausible.Miami shootout and the quest for a more effective cartridge...
Having worked for the federal government and often involved in procurement for a good many years, lots of bean counters could, would, and have approved such things.I realize this is the Federal Government we are talking about, but what bean counter would buy off on it being cheaper to buy 250 new Springfield Professionals (or Les Baer customs) than simply tune up the triggers on pistols they already owned.
There were even more hidden cost to the Professionals. In order to keep them running, they had to add top tier 1911 gunsmiths to their payroll.I realize this is the Federal Government we are talking about, but what bean counter would buy off on it being cheaper to buy 250 new Springfield Professionals (or Les Baer customs) than simply tune up the triggers on pistols they already owned. I suspect there was another reason.
It isn't a frame issue, it's a slide issue, that is why the Mk III has a reinforced slideWow... all these folks talking about service life being short on the BHP. I didn't realize an all steel gun had gotten so fragil. All steel BHP - Alloy Beretta...Hum? Maybe my old BHP will last as long as the M9 does for the military.
While the P-35 triggers are inherently horrible, I'm fairly confident that Novak's shop removed the Magazine disconnect when they modified them
Generalizations are, by definition, broad...that is what makes them generalizations. I'm curious how one gets from overly broad to untrue, While it might be untrue of a limited number of examples, the generalization is what makes it valid...the sheer number of threads advocating improving the trigger pull by removing the mag safety would seem to be addition validation. Why would folks improve what is already, "OK to stellar"I think that is an overly broad generalization concerning the trigger that is just plain untrue. I've had new MK III Hi Powers with triggers varying from OK to stellar, out of the box. Yes, they can be heavy, and a bit gritty at first. Often, some use or slight tuning will make them serviceable if not excellent.
Would you offer another model of handgun with a MSRP of ~$1k which has a worst out of the box SAO trigger?
The P7 is the only H&K with a SAO triggerH&K, with exception of the discontinued P7
The three MK III Hi Powers I have owned have had crisp, albeit heavy triggers (due to the the overly heavy hammer spring) right out of the box. I left the mag disconnect in, and did not do any trigger work. The SA triggers were excellent, and better than my stock Springfield Milspec 1911.Generalizations are, by definition, broad...that is what makes them generalizations. I'm curious how one gets from overly broad to untrue, While it might be untrue of a limited number of examples, the generalization is what makes it valid...the sheer number of threads advocating improving the trigger pull by removing the mag safety would seem to be addition validation. Why would folks improve what is already, "OK to stellar"
I'm not sure why you seem so defensive about a known feature of the P-35. Perhaps our definitions differ based on our experiences. Would you offer another model of handgun with a MSRP of ~$1k which has a worst out of the box SAO trigger?
The P7 is the only H&K with a SAO trigger
The P9S, HK-4, USP, P2000, P30 and HK45 are all DA/SA or LEM; the VP-70 was DAO