New rifle!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Obturation

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
3,991
Location
Northern illinois
Hey all,
Hope everyone's doing well and not getting too stir-crazy. Went and picked up my new rifle tonight. NICS check took 8 days (no surprise ) , but I didn't buy a panic gun. I got something out of the norm for me, as I always buy lever actions and revolvers. I was on the fence between a BFR in 500 JRH and a Henry big boy all weather in 45 colt, I got neither. I decided instead on a practical firearm that is rugged and useful but light weight & handy. A ruger 77/357.
20200327_212619.jpg
20200327_212631.jpg
These aren't common, in fact I've never seen one in person and none of the several LGSs ever have any for inspection. My primary range gun is a gp100 and I mainly load 357s for fun shooting and soup can destruction. So this rifle makes sense in that role. Hopefully it will like the same loads as my gp100, if it doesn't I can work around it.theres something to be said for a pistol caliber carbine in ease of carry and general use. Won't beat you up, drain your wallet, use mountains of powder to load and uses extremely common and inexpensive components for fairly powerful loads. I can't say I'm a hunter, although I'd love a place where I could hunt and ranges in my area top out at about 100 yards typically. I have proper rifle calibers if I get a chance to need one but I got this gun for pure plinking fun. It feels good to just buy something out of the realm of what you would normally buy, on a whim and throw caution to the wind sometimes. So far looking it over I see excellent fit and finish, excellent rifling and smooth operation, trigger is a bit heavy but it is crisp . I know ruger has its QC issues like any maker but any time I've needed CS they've been top notch. I trust ruger more than any other manufacturer for making things right if there is an issue so I didn't hesitate to buy this rifle that is a bit of odd ball in the world of pcc's . range report to follow- when they re-open.
 
These aren't common, in fact I've never seen one in person and none of the several LGSs ever have any for inspection.

Funny, now that you mention it, neither have I. I got my 77/44 on special order back in 1999 and haven't seen one of those around here either since then.

Ruger All Weather 77 44 02.jpg

Pick up an extra mag or two -- these are a pain to reload, but easy to swap in the field. Are you planning to go with the factory open sights, rear peep, scope or red dot?
 
Are you planning to go with the factory open sights, rear peep, scope or red dot?
Well , I hadn't thought about it. I may put something compact on , I'll see how I can do without an optic . the sights are drift adjustable but no elevation adjustment, I think it will depend on trying to find a load it can agree with my gp100 on and seeing if I need some sight regulation. Minute of soup can at 50 yards is acceptable to me, so I may not need to weigh it down with optics. If anyone has a recommendation for a low powered and compact option I'd be interested in hearing it .
 
I want one. Probably way more accurate than my original 92 rifle, converted in 1966. Mine may have the edge in cool but cool only shoots so far.
 
Man...that is a slick looking rifle. Looks like it'll be fun too. To me, it's screaming for a little Weaver V3, but I don't even know if you can find one anymore.

I had one mounted on my 77/44 at one time, but it's since migrated to my CZ527 7.62x39: Cz527762223.jpg

Weaver still catalogs the V3 Classic, but they do seem in short supply -- mostly I'm finding their equivalent Kaspa scope instead.
 
Yep, nice little scope and very under rated. I got mine when 30mm scope tube were all the rage, even for the lower magnification scopes. I bought mine taking a chance and am glad I did. I've had mine for a lot of years now and it gets passed from rifle to rifle.
 
Congrats from me, too. Always thought highly of those and I've never seen one in person either. Got the itch for a pistol caliber long gun a couple years ago and looked at a few 44 mag. lever guns but at the time they were all a bit overpriced, IMHO, so I passed on them. Didn't see anything else other than a 9mm Ruger PC Carbine which I purchased and like. But I'd still LOVE to get a 77 / 357....... I already reload 357..... Why not ?
 
I'll admit, I'm not a rifle guy. Not that the 77/357 is much of a "rifle" per se, I wanted to run something by you guys regarding sighting/ load development.
I have a bushnell banner 3-9×40 laying around, it's a cheap scope but in good shape and the turrets work properly. I have the rings included with the rifle and spare time :uhoh:.
I'm thinking about doing my load development with the scope and when I figure out exactly what shoots the best remove it -if I see fit, which I probably will.
Question is : is this a waste of time as I likely won't use a scope long term on this gun? I will assume I can hold a tighter 50 yard group with a scope but once the optics removed I'll be without the sighting advantage so possibly the accuracy possible won't necessarily be realized when going back to iron sights.
It's a weird question and hopefully I'm wording it in a way that makes sense. The stated course of action seems a logical form of load development but usually the scope stays on so I'm just second guessing myself and got too dang much time to think about it at the moment without a range to see for myself.
Thanks!
 
I'll have to keep an eye on this. I'm considering picking one up to pair with a revolver as grab n go guns for weekends with the guys on fishing/camping trips.
 
I'll have to keep an eye on this. I'm considering picking one up to pair with a revolver as grab n go guns for weekends with the guys on fishing/camping trips.
That's the general idea here too, a pair of reasonably powerful firearms (rifle & revolver) that are easy & cheap to feed and not so expensive that I would worry about taking them out to the woods for a week or two. I'll get it all figured out and keep you guys updated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top