I try to be very careful with "old data".
I prefer to use data with "all of the details" and results shown with velocity and with pressure in psi. I consider data with pressure shown in cup to be only a smidge better than data with no pressure info (which I normally consider to be "interesting" but not assured of being safe).
I consider the 2005 Alliant data to be "good" in that it does show results with the pressure in psi for most of the loads presented. I have a copy of Alliant data back to 2000 with pressure results in psi. My 1987 Hercules data is all in cup. Data after 2005 seems to be pushing the "newer" pistol powders that Alliant developed and they completely quit showing the results for pressure.
However, where the 2005 guide only identifies the bullet used by a general description (instead of a specific bullet), it less than perfect. If the load in question uses a bullet with a "standard" profile (therefore a consistent length), it is probably as good as any data out there. If the load has more uncertainty in the bullet length, then there is less certainty that the end user can duplicate the published results. The bullet length issue is more significant with "small volume" cartridges such as 380, 9mm, 40 S&W or loads that otherwise come close to filling the case.