Now the AG wants no part!
Jared at G&G was pleading yesterday for any LEO in the state to arrest her.The state's attorney general does what she tells him to and she appoints the state police chief so I would say to forget about any chance of arrest.
Wow, good for him!I have to say the state police were nice here during Covid. They arrested no and just explained to business what could happen if they ignored her orders. Some did which really aroused her ire and one cafe amassed $50,000 in fines before throwing in the towel and closing and then filed suit on her. Never saw the results of that. Other business gave in after lesser fines. Many just shut their doors and walked away never to reopen.
Our sheriff was ordered to enforce her rules and he explained quite forcefully that he worked for the citizens of Lea county and not her. She took him to court to force him to. It made it all the way to the supreme court where she lost.
SHE TOLD THE SHERIFFS THEY HAD TO DISARM?!?!?!? That's beyond mind-boggling...She isn't smart, just arrogant and power mad. She got off on the wrong foot with almost all of the sheriffs in the state the day she took office. It is a tradition for all the sheriffs to gather in Santa Fe and welcome the new governor into the office. She told them they had to disarm before entering the capital building. Three did so. The others just turned around and left so there has been a lot of bad blood between the two positions since.
The article doesn't mention whether the shooter in the recent incident cited was a permit holder. Which leads one to assume he was not.The drum beat against concealed carry goes on: https://apnews.com/article/michigan...ing_date_20230912&cid=db&source=ams&sourceid=
Note students and faculty were already banned. Now, pretty soon the only place you will be able to carry is on some billionaire's private yacht (hint!). Oh, the glory of Bruen and the beauty of the procedural majesty of the courts dealing with the challenges to our rights in real time. Thus, I lament, yet again to the annoyance of some lawyers.
Now five lawsuits filed against NM governor's carry ban - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/new-mexico-governors-carry-ban-lawsuits.923017/motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by FPC, SAF and New Mexico Shooting Sports Association against the governor
Just might be the silver lining ... test case for Bruen.My dream is that Scotus sees these shenanigans and establishes a very quick path for 2nd A right unlike their glacial, procedural BS now.I wouldn't be surprised if a coalition of Democrat governors had already talked about attempting this type of action in a state where the party controls the legislature and has a lapdog state police administration, just as kind of a trial balloon, and Albuquerque citizens are the unlucky guinea pigs.
Let's hope it does and that it goes our way.Just might be the silver lining ... test case for Bruen.
NM governor just may have shaved years off many 2A cases.
SAF and FPC have also filed suit now.
SAF press release is at https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-comments-replies-please.887535/post-12715197
FPC press release is at https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-comments-replies-please.921659/post-12715204
Now five lawsuits filed against NM governor's carry ban - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/new-mexico-governors-carry-ban-lawsuits.923017/
What's the point when the damage would have already been done and the gun ban expired before it is ruled on most likely as being moot. Even if it is ruled in our favor, the Governor already knew it would be. She basically stated as much. She also knew that she would have already gotten her way aka the month long gun ban, so even if she loses, she wins.GOA, SAF, FPC, etc. have filed lawsuits.
The NM State AG says he doesn't think it is constitutional.
Local officials say it isn't constitutional.
Anti-2A activists and politicians say it isn't constitutional and unwise.
Hopefully this will turn out to be a disaster for her that provides more than just egg on the Governor's face.
She's not getting her way if nobody is enforcing it.What's the point when the damage would have already been done and the gun ban expired before it is ruled on most likely as being moot. Even if it is ruled in our favor, the Governor already knew it would be. She basically stated as much. She also knew that she would have already gotten her way aka the month long gun ban, so even if she loses, she wins.
gun ban expired before it is ruled on
CCRKBA issued a press release pointing out the importance of voting. See at https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-comments-replies-please.887535/post-12715280Could you imagine what politicians would do if never called out on their BS?
She knew when she did it, that it was unconstitutional and did it anyway.
She should be bounced out on her arse but the other Democrats don't have the spine to do it!
It was their "test run" to see what would happen. They all knew full well what was happening but stayed quiet.
I do, she needs to be fired for willfully violating the Constitution. No citizens should be putting up with any of this Unconstitutional crap anywhere in the United States. We truly are pathetic to have allowed any of this to have happened. The founders were a lot smarter than we are.New Mexico governor issues order suspending the right to carry firearms in public across Albuquerque.
Due to a "spate of gun violence."
(Presumably committed by criminals, often against other criminals, but also presumably not because legal gun-carriers are contributing to this epidemic of gun violence in Albuquerque.
I have no words...
https://news.yahoo.com/mexico-governor-issues-order-suspend-234135580.html
I head she is going to have state police enforce it.She's not getting her way if nobody is enforcing it.
That's what she said, but it remains to be seen whether they will acquiesce. They may or may not vocally oppose it, but we'll see soon enough whether they actually proactively enforce it. They are in a tough spot. Any NM lawyers here who can tell us if what she said is really true, i.e. that they "have to" enforce executive orders, regardless of constitutionality?I head she is going to have state police enforce it.
Yes, and he did a great job. Someone posted a link upthread to an X posting by FPC that reproduced the letter.the AG manned up and went against her.
Legally she could declare martial law, governors can do that for civil unrest. Then the military, ie national guard takes control and lets the state and local cops off the hook.
Exactly just the same crime that has existed there for decades upon decades.There are no sweeping riots, there are no lynching mobs, there are no natural disasters, or any other agents of disruption of civil authority or effectiveness.
Sigh.READ my last sentence.
Impeachment is political as well. It is done by the legislative branch, not the judicial branch, even if has some of the ritual (largely performative) of a legal investigation.As I understand it, Impeachment is a LEGAL process and Recall is a POLITICAL one. Yes?
I actually think it is useful in the long run when politicians overreach in a very public way. It reminds the normally dormant and self-absorbed populace of the importance of paying attention and that it is possible to hold politicians accountable.Could you imagine what politicians would do if never called out on their BS?
She knew when she did it, that it was unconstitutional and did it anyway.
She should be bounced out on her arse but the other Democrats don't have the spine to do it!
It was their "test run" to see what would happen. They all knew full well what was happening but stayed quiet.