NM Right-To-Carry Reform

Status
Not open for further replies.

sm

member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
28,387
Location
Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
http://www.townhall.com/news/politics/200504/NAT20050408a.shtml

More New Mexicans May Carry Concealed Weapons

(CNSNews.com) - New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Democrat, signed a bill on Wednesday expanding his state's concealed carry law.

House Bill 641, the Right-to-Carry Reform Bill, lowers the minimum age for permit applicants from 25 to 21; it makes concealed-carry licenses good for four years instead of two; and it allows police to enter into reciprocal agreements with other right-to-carry states.

"These changes will encourage more law abiding New Mexicans to apply for a license and protect themselves in a lawful, responsible manner," said Chris W. Cox, NRA's chief lobbyist.

The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) also applauded Gov. Richardson for signing a bill that it describes as a true reform measure.

"The law recognizes that young adults have just as much right to self-defense as older citizens, and that 21-year-olds in New Mexico are just as responsible as 21-year-olds in other states who are already legally-licensed to carry," said CCRKBA Executive Director Joe Waldron.

"If they are old enough to carry a firearm to defend this nation, they're certainly old enough to carry a firearm to defend themselves," he added.

Gov. Richardson pushed for the original concealed carry law two years ago, Waldron noted. "Now he's signed common-sense reform legislation that expands this law, with the understanding that it will deter criminals and empower more New Mexico citizens to protect themselves."

House Bill 641, sponsored by State Rep. John Heaton (D), received strong bipartisan support.

"We would hope that governors in a few other states, namely Wisconsin, Nebraska, Illinois and Kansas, will take a lesson from Gov. Richardson," Waldron said. "Personal protection is not a right that stops at a state's borders, nor is it any less important for people in the upper Midwest than it is in the Southwest."

The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms says it is dedicated to preserving firearms freedoms through active lobbying of elected officials and facilitating grass-roots organization of gun rights activists in local communities throughout the United States.
 
We would hope that governors in a few other states, namely Wisconsin, Nebraska, Illinois and Kansas, will take a lesson from Gov. Richardson...

New Mexico apparently didn't have time to do the job right, but found time to do it over—for which it deserves applause. I'm sure Wisconsin, Nebraska, Kansas, and Iowa will grow up eventually; Illinois is another matter altogether.
 
No state yet has found time to do it right.
Not even Vermont. Vermont requiores you to obtain the weapon.

NM is actually doing right well compared to some others.
Some are already working on changes for next year.

Oh well, eat the pie one bite at a time.

Sam
 
The REAL Story Here

Congratulations to New Mexico and Governor Bill Richardson.

Now, for the REAL impact of this move:

It makes Richardson a top candidate to be Hillary's Vice-President on the Democrat ticket in '08.

Talking points:
1. He's a Westerner -- in a marginally "red" state -- which could help offset Hillary's innate repugnance to certain "crossover" voters in those states.
2. He's Hispanic and can stop the recents GOP gains in this demographic.
3. He's also a former member of Bill Clinton's cabinet, thus, palatable to Hillary and Dem insiders.
4. And, when Hillary spews about how she "doesn't want to take away sportsmens' guns", she can point to her V.P. guy who, after all, signed N.M.'s "carry law."

"Hill & New-Bill in '08" -- it could easily be just enough to fool a bunch of "moderate" (i.e., marginally-informed, non-ideological, and easily duped) voters in narrowly-Republican states like Ohio, Florida, Wisconsin, New Mexico, and Iowa. Given the Cast-In-Concrete predicability of all the other Red vs. Blue states' votes, that'll give her the Electoral College winning margin.

As Hil's V.P., does anyone here really think Richardson will influence her views on the 2nd Amendment... once in office? Get ready for another big Assault Weapons/Hi-Cap Magazines/Pre-Confiscation Registration battle, boys. And remember, it's For The Children -- and it is coming, all nice and tied-up in pink ribbons... and greased-up for easy insertion.
 
aatrapperjohn,
If Vermont did it right they would issue the weapons.

TonjinTwentyMill,
Richardson is not positioning himself as a VP for Hillarious.
He is going for the big one himself. He is a much more viable presidential candidate than she. He actually has a reputation for semi rational behavior.

Sam
 
Richardson (N.Mex.) vs. Hillary?

Sam, you make a valid point about him and his potential candidacy.

However, Hillary has so much fund-raising star power, I doubt anyone can catch her. I mean, can you imagine Hollywood, the Move-On/Soros gang, and the MainStream (i.e., elitist-left) Media all getting behind Richardson instead of Hillary?

On the other hand, if some corruption-in-her-past shadows ever come to light, Richardson could have a shot. But, the MSM already had their go at this (Whitewater, etc.) and they whiffed.

Gonna be an interesting next 3 yrs on the political-theatre scene. And, with Concealed Carry spreading everywhere (except in CaliMassaJerseyYork -- Hillary's power-base), she could be left out on the 2A issue. However, while 2A rings our bell, it does not do so, regrettably, with most "moderates."
 
If Vermont did it right they would issue the weapons.

A joke, right? A $300 handgun would cost $3000 in tax money, at least.

People should be willing to do something for themselves. :rolleyes:
 
Yes enfield, a joke.

TonkinTwentyMill,
I really think she is unelectable on a national scale. Not necessarily a matter of scandal, just a reputation for spontaneous foolishness and mean spiritedness that tyhe people as a whole won't accept. The nation is a long way from ready accept her. Richardson is much more electable and has the right mix of experience to get the nomination. Hell he could probably get nominated by Republicans if he tried a little.

It will be an interesting 3 years.

Anybody making book on who will run for it. All parties.


Sam
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top