NRA members: Should people on the federal terrorist watch list be able to buy a gun?

NRA members: should being on a federal terrorist watch list ban american citizens 2A

  • 1. No one on the terrorist watch list should be able to buy a gun.

    Votes: 29 19.7%
  • 2. Foreigners on the list should not be able to buy a gun, but citizens can

    Votes: 33 22.4%
  • 3. American citizens should not be placed on a terrorist watch list for any reason

    Votes: 26 17.7%
  • 4. A terrorist watch list shouldn't even exist

    Votes: 47 32.0%
  • 5. I'm not an NRA member

    Votes: 12 8.2%

  • Total voters
    147
Status
Not open for further replies.
What is the definition of a terrorist?

Terrorism is, in the most general sense, the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion. At present, the International community has been unable to formulate a universally agreed, legally binding, criminal law definition of terrorism. Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (civilians).

Some definitions also include acts of unlawful violence and war. The history of terrorist organizations suggests that they do not select terrorism for its political effectiveness. Individual terrorists tend to be motivated more by a desire for social solidarity with other members of their organization than by political platforms or strategic objectives, which are often murky and undefined.

The word "terrorism" is politically and emotionally charged, and this greatly compounds the difficulty of providing a precise definition. Studies have found over 100 definitions of “terrorism”. The concept of terrorism may itself be controversial as it is often used by state authorities to delegitimize political or other opponents, and potentially legitimize the state's own use of armed force against opponents (such use of force may itself be described as "terror" by opponents of the state.). A less politically and emotionally charged, and more easily definable, term is violent non-state actor (though the semantic scope of this term includes not only "terrorists," while excluding some individuals or groups who have previously been described as "terrorists").

Terrorism has been practiced by a broad array of political organizations for furthering their objectives. It has been practiced by both right-wing and left-wing political parties, nationalistic groups, religious groups, revolutionaries, and ruling governments. One form is the use of violence against noncombatants for the purpose of gaining publicity for a group, cause, or individual.
:scrutiny:

I ask the question again........what is the definition of a terrorist?


People who commit premeditated murder are called murderers.
People who declare war against the United States and attack us are called the enemy. We don't need any more laws or any more words. We already have it covered.
 
I don't support security theatre, so if they are US citizens their rights should not be denied. If the government wants to charge them and convict them of a federal crime, which would prevent them from legaly purchasing a weapon thats fine.
 
The "watch lists" are a bit of a joke. I was placed on a watch list about five years ago because I took money out of a savings account to put a down payment on a new home. The bank officer told me that anyone moving a large sum 0of money is automatically placed on a watch list in case they were going to use the money to buy weapons of mass destruction.

Being on a list doesn't bother me as much as the thought of how much money is being wasted by the FBI to compile these lists.

Being on a watch list hasn't kept me from purchasing the firearms that I've chosen to purchase. This is a little off topic, but I felt like throwing in my $.02.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top