NY Gun Owners Threatening Non-Compliance With New Gun Control Laws

Status
Not open for further replies.
Skribs said:
it is population based

Not to mention, it isn't as simple as just "vote 'em out"

Gun rights are not a voting issue for everyone.

I didn't vote for Obama, I didn't vote for Warner or Kaine, Virginia's Senators. How is it my fault if they push through gun legislation?

Blaming New York gun owners opposed to this law for voting in these legislators is akin to blaming political dissidents in North Korea for letting the Communist take over.

James Madison said the Constitution should protect or individual rights from factions...unfortunately, that hasn't worked over our entire history.
 
Ooooo. This creates a moral dillema for THR moderators. THR traditionally does not allow postings that advocate breaking the law............:uhoh::confused::eek::rolleyes:
 
Who gets to decide that one?

In this forum, the moderators. Legally, the courts, up to and potentially including the Supreme Court. But look at how the latter is divided strictly along political lines these days, with some of the justices obviously trying to legislate from the bench despite what the Constitution says. The ultimate judge in a free country is always by definition the people, both through indirect means via elections and more direct means when necessary (e.g. jury nullification, civil disobedience, revolution). The deliberate breaking of unjust laws is hardly unprecedented, and I suspect that there is a reason this thread has remained open.
 
Brighter people than me will probably find the best answer. But the classic civil disobedience in the face of unjust laws is bubblegum on the sidewalks. Something bothersome to the tyrant, but where he can't really do anything about it. Eventually he tires out.

AR owners might be 1% of the population. Too few to make much difference by moving (to reduce tax base). A small enough population that it is easy to tyrannize them. Add in "hi-cap" pistol owners and you might have a tax issue, if say, they all decided to delay sending in their property tax by quite a while. Not long enough to risk a lien, but long enough to adversely impact the governmental finances. Or put bubblegum on the check.

Just thinking....
 
prohibition is an interesting thing to bring up. Massive non enforcement, massive non-compliance
depends on where you live. Many other threads on that subject.
 
This is a prickly one. If you truly believe that the 2A is about defending against tyranny and that registration leads to confiscation I can't see how in good conscience you would register. Once the government has that info it's there forever. This may be the one step too far for many
 
Brighter people than me will probably find the best answer. But the classic civil disobedience in the face of unjust laws is bubblegum on the sidewalks. Something bothersome to the tyrant, but where he can't really do anything about it. Eventually he tires out.

AR owners might be 1% of the population. Too few to make much difference by moving (to reduce tax base). A small enough population that it is easy to tyrannize them. Add in "hi-cap" pistol owners and you might have a tax issue, if say, they all decided to delay sending in their property tax by quite a while. Not long enough to risk a lien, but long enough to adversely impact the governmental finances. Or put bubblegum on the check.

Just thinking....
I think it's more than 1%.

...then that means there are at least 2,446,294 AR-15 rifles currently available in the United States.

Also doesn't figure in AK's, SKS's, FAL's, M1A's, M1 Carbines or Mini-14's.
 
Good point but I myself have several. So fewer persons than firearms. The trick is to find something you can do that causes a problem when thousands copy, but looks silly to prosecute. Bubblegum on tax checks, glue inside the envelope, jam phone lines, delay payment , add sugar. Something.
 
Sure, ignore the law, get caught, get convicted (AND YOU WILL BE CONVICTED OR PLEA!) if caught and then be a felon for the rest of your life.

What's voting or owning other firearms (or the NY illegal firearms while living in another state) worth to you?

Stay, comply, vote and push for change or get out or, get the offending guns out as many Californian's did. But don't make a point that'll put you right into the group they want you in - a felon.
 
we are trying to vote out our legislators who put this on us. We haven't even been successful in getting competent people on the ballot to run against them. Its not as simple as 'voting for the other guy/gal'. we are having to foster candidates from scratch. Don't forget we had a number of Repubs who supported this proudly.
 
we are trying to vote out our legislators who put this on us. We haven't even been successful in getting competent people on the ballot to run against them. Its not as simple as 'voting for the other guy/gal'. we are having to foster candidates from scratch. Don't forget we had a number of Repubs who supported this proudly.
Yup - been there, done that when I lived in California.
Sometimes your the salmon who make it to the spawning beds
Sometimes the bears get you
Sometimes you smash yourself against the rock in vain

or

Sometimes you're the salmon who says "ta hell with it" and just goes elsewhere...
 
IMHO, this is not one of the battles worth fighting.

We are not talking a slap on the wrist for misdemeanor civil disobedience.
The people promulgating these laws would think nothing of throwing you in prison for 5 years, branding you a felon (thereby extinguishing your RTKBA), keeping you from your kids, and blacklisting you from any profession that requires a clean record.

I know I am not answering your question about what is worth fighting for, but that is not what is on the table.
I think your outline of the potential consequences makes my point that this is indeed worth fighting for. A government that turns honest people into criminals overnight for no-good reason and then uses threat of ruin, violence and prison to impose their will is not the kind of government I want to bequeath to my kids and grand kids. I think this is worth taking a stand on...but as I said someplace else, everyone has their own idea of when to fight, run or hunker down...so I'm just expressing my opinion here, not trying to be an arrogant judge. ;)
 
But the classic civil disobedience in the face of unjust laws is bubblegum on the sidewalks. Something bothersome to the tyrant, but where he can't really do anything about it. Eventually he tires out.
... Or put bubblegum on the check.

Chewing gum ban in Singapore

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewing_gum_ban_in_Singapore

Now people in singapore pee in elevators and bring bags of poop from home to smear in public places.
 
Sure, ignore the law, get caught, get convicted (AND YOU WILL BE CONVICTED OR PLEA!) if caught and then be a felon for the rest of your life.

What's voting or owning other firearms (or the NY illegal firearms while living in another state) worth to you?

Stay, comply, vote and push for change or get out or, get the offending guns out as many Californian's did. But don't make a point that'll put you right into the group they want you in - a felon.

Staying and voting will do nothing in this case. Even if you can get the law repealed, you cannot unregister your gun.

There are plenty of heroes in our history who were branded felons by those in power at their time. They resisted unjust laws and now they are heroes because they changed the world for the rest of us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top