chasu
Member
What are your opinions on using 35 Whelen out to 300 yards. I'm capable of shooting that range with the Thompson Encore, but is the cartridge inherently accurate? I'm shooting 200gr Fusion.
I have no idea why it and the 338/06 are not far more popular.
A 35 Whelen loaded properly is at least a 300 yard gun. It will have a bit more arched trajectory than other rounds, but with a range finder and some skill it could probably be used to 400 or even farther.
I've owned both in the past and will share why I no longer own either. A 30-06 can be loaded with lighter 150 gr bullets and offer far flatter trajectory and more versatility if hunting deer sized game and when loaded with 200-220 gr bullets will do anything a 338-06 or 35 Whelen will do with 200-250 gr bullets on larger game, except kick a lot harder. If you move up to bullets heavier than 250 gr the 35 Whelen and 338-06 start to offer marginal advantages at close ranges, but with magnum recoil levels.
A lot of folks think, I know I did, they are gaining a bit of an advantage over 30-06, but without the magnum recoil with these 2 rounds. I found the opposite to be true. Recoil was right at 300 mag levels, but with virtually no improvement over 30-06. I decided that if I was going to get kicked like a 300 magnum, I'd just as soon shoot a 300 magnum.
Not to say there is a thing wrong with either round. They both are suitable for anything in NA, have manageable recoil and trajectory flat enough for most reasonable hunting. They both are just enough out of the mainstream to appeal to the guy who just wants to use something different, but ammo is easily loaded for both and factory 35 Whelen ammo is fairly easy to find. While I never did so, one advantage of 35 Whelen is the ability to use very light small game loads using 357 revolver bullets.