Unless a law is based on right reason, it is merely something that a violent man or violent group of men arbitrarily say you must do, lest you suffer violence. Because they say so. No more, no less.
In other words, it's not a law. It's not a dictate of reason. It's a command: an ultimatum of violence. It is an unjust command, at that.
You don't seem to get it. Regardless of its intentions or purposes, the 1934 NFA really IS the law that's on the books and it MUST be obeyed, end of discussion. You can argue it however you want, but it doesn't change the basic facts; it passed was passed on a majority vote, advanced through both houses, and was signed into law by the president, thus making it as much a law as anything else. If you don't like that fact, if you disagree with it, I don't care in the least, that's how it is and you either have to live with it or lump it.
If you don't like the NFA, then do something about it! Don't give me excuses, get off your butt and do something about it! I joined the NRA, I personally helped get the Emergency Powers bill passed, I helped get the state of Kansas opened up so people like you could own machineguns and short barreled shotguns! Even before I joined I was spreading the news about the new AWB, I was getting the word out on the Tiahrt Amendment and why it was so important, etc. I have actually done something about what I don't like! As we speak I'm drafting a letter to my congressmen and state representatives to voice my displeasure with the Hughes Amendment in the FOPA and asking that they draft and introduce legislation that would repeal it. That's how I'm making a difference, that's how I'm addressing this.
What exactly are you doing about it?