Solomonson
Member
I had hoped the price would be under $300.00 Time will tell I suppose...
https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/products2.cfm/ID/245413
https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/products2.cfm/ID/245413
To compete with the well-reviewed Taurus and Walther .22 offerings that are going to be compared against it, Glock better drop the price some or they won’t sell to anyone not totally ga-ga over everything Glock.
I’d like one to shoot alongside my Glock 9mms... but not for more than $265.00-ish.
Stay safe.
I had the p22. Functioned fine but a Glock will be a better built weapon and worthy of a few extra bucks. Caveat, not a big Glock fan either but zinc construction on that Walther? Pssshh, junk.
Should've bought the Walther PPQ .22 worlds different on quality than the P22. The P22 imho is junk.
This Glock will have a hard time replacing my PPQ 22, it has been flawless other than the random dud round which has been very few. It runs well suppressed and unsupressed.
To compete with the well-reviewed Taurus and Walther .22 offerings that are going to be compared against it, Glock better drop the price some or they won’t sell to anyone not totally ga-ga over everything Glock.
I’d like one to shoot alongside my Glock 9mms... but not for more than $265.00-ish.
Stay safe.
Woman wanted the p22. Then she didn't. So, goodbye. And your honest opinion about the p22 isn't an opinion, it's fact. It's junk and is guaranteed to fail much sooner than a quality weapon would.
Yep it will sell, however Glock dropped the ball big time...a G19 sized gun (read grip frame) and they only put 10 rounds in it...WTH were they thinking
They were thinking they want to sell in mag restricted states. Reliability??? The Keltec has 33 rounds...They were thinking reliability. They did extensive testing developing the Glock 44 and found that that single stack magazine was the most reliable.
fireside44
Couldn't agree more about the Walther P22! A truly abysmal handgun incapable of getting through more than one magazine without some sort of problem. And when we did get it to work it then had to be cleaned every 50 rounds or so just to keep it running...sort of!
I'm seriously considering one of these:
https://www.budsgunshop.com/product_info.php/cPath/2084_21_55/products_id/84708/Firearms/Handguns/Walther+Arms/Walther+Arms+Colt+5170304+1911+Government+Tribute+.22+LR++5+12+1+Poly+Grips
Cheap enough that it's tempting but I'm really not a 1911 guy. Might just save that money and apply it to the G44. Makes more sense to complement my other Glocks for consistency and training purposes.
They were thinking they want to sell in mag restricted states. Reliability??? The Keltec has 33 rounds...
Yes, reliability as stated in some of the videos and interviews that are going around. The Kel-Tec you are referring to is in no real way comparable to the Glock. Unless you consider that giant abomination to be a compact carry style gun. The Glock would be directly comparable to Kel-Tecs new little .22 that holds 16 rounds and is so reliable it should be considered a single shot pistol with a 16 round magazine.
Yeah, like Glock would want to use technology for their Glock 44 from this POS.
I would not make a bet all Keltecs are like the one in the video. I have learned a long time ago to try a gun out for myself rather than so much of the crap on the internet and Youtubers. The Glock has not even hit the streets and yet so many are bellyaching about the price and the round count. Do you really actually think the Pre-order price is the same price 6 months from Now? Or that all the vendors of magazines in the world will or cannot actually get a larger round magazine down the road, and not to say Glock already has them? Or that for now they are using a 10 rounder for sure success of reliability? And later introduce larger magazines. For myself, 10 rds is fine. The high round count is now the Internet latest fad. I get it.Yeah I'd MUCH rather take 10 rds capacity than 16 rds of failure to feeds
Or that for now they are using a 10 rounder for sure success of reliability?