Primer Comparisons; 400, BR4, 41

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
3,424
Location
Kansas
(I meant BR4, of course:oops:). Anyway, as promised earlier, I ran a test yesterday with the same loads for 6.5 Grendel and 223, varying only the primers. The numbers below are averages of 5 shots each primer for the 6.6 Grendel, and 10 shots each primer for the 223.

First, the loads:
6.5 Grendel: 28 grains IMR8208, Hornady ELD 123 grain, Hornady cases, OAL 2.250
223: 28.0 grains CFE223, Hornady ELD 52 grain, PMC cases OAL 2.220
Hornady Black: Standard commercial with Hornady ELD 123 bullet.

Now the results:

Capture.JPG

As you can see in the table, the BR4 were the lowest SD and ES for each cartridge. It was the middle velocity for each cartridge, but the highest average velocity was less predictable with it being the CCI41 in the 6.5 Grendel, and CCI400 in the 223.

I'm concerned about the SD's and ES in the 223's. My previous testing of this load (CCI400 primer) was 3150 fps with a 40 SD and 103 spread, so although it's a very precise load in the tested rifle (the BR4 loads yesterday were a 10 shot 0.7" group at 50 yards and often 3 shot groups of this loading are <0.4MOA), it's not very consistent. I attribute that to the CFE223, either just the powder itself, or to the temperature stability, which I'm never that crazy about. I could have a larger ES and SD here because I shot those groups in 5 shot segments...5 shots of each primer load, then 5 more shots of each...so there were about 10-15 minutes between the first and second groups and they were probably cooling between the groups from the basement temperature of 67ºF to the outside of about 45ºF at the time of the 2nd group.

I think I'm going to work up something else. Does anyone have any other favorites in 223 that are more consistent, esp temperature-wise? That rifle really likes those 52 ELD's so I'd like to stay with them. Hodgdon doesn't list any Hodgdon powders on their website for 52 grain ELD's but list loads for the 55 grain bullets for Varget, Benchmark, H4895, or IMR8208 and I have all those. I like H4895 in 224 Valkyrie, and the IMR8208 in both 6.5 Grendel and Creedmores. Anyone?

BTW, thanks to everyone for the advice in this previous thread; I purchased the Magnetospeed Sporter and it seemed to work perfectly yesterday on a reasonably gusty day with no clouds, a day when my old Chrony would have been worthless. I had no trouble at all with the Sporter, except that I needed to adjust the sensitivity from "regular" to "high 2" to pick up the 223's.
 
Last edited:
I did very much the same test with H335 in the 5.56mm some years ago... and your results mirror mine. The #400 primer gave higher velocity and better SD numbers than the #41 primer... even though a 'Magnum' primer is recommended with H335 ball powder.
 
With your ES & SD so large you need to work in reducing this. Get you ES into the 20's then retest and you have better data. CFE223 for me works best toward the upper end. Bumping you load up should reduce your numbers. Are you crimping?

I do primer test last after having my load worked up so it's consistent. If it's jumping around your not in a node to get stability.

If your concern about temp, put your ammo in a small ice chest till you need it. I use a small Playmate chest. Best to have every thing at the same temp, just not in the sun if you can avoid it. I would not expect a thermal problem in the range your shooting at. Normally it's when the temps get above 90F and below 40 where the most problems shows up.
 
Blue68f100; I'd love to, but can't; my load is weighed to 0.1 grains and checked periodically on a separate scale so I'm not sure how to improve it. I'm afraid to increase the CFE223 from 28.0 grains; it's already showing flat primers and it is nearing the top of Hodgdon's chart for 55 grain bullets.

Yes, I crimp; Lee Crimp Die

I'm only concerned about temp in that one can't always control the temperature one shoots at and I'd rather have a load stable over a wide range of temperatures. From previous experience, that isn't CFE223.
 
What twist barrel and chamber do you have?

Try a few without using the FCD. I've tried it once and it hurt accuracy.

I had a fast twist (1:8) barrel with the Wydle chamber it would not shoot anything lighter than 62 gr. The best ai could get was 1.5 moa @100 yrds.

I tried the Hornady 52gr and my gun did not like them. But the 52gr SMK shoot lights out, .5 moat at 100 yrds. I'm using TAC for that load. I use 27.7gr of CFE223 behind the Hornady 55gr FMJ-BT. This shoots 1 moa, which is not bad for a $0.8 bullet.
 
It's a 223 chamber and a 1:8 twist barrel. Accuracy with the CFE223 +Hornady 52 grain loads is not a problem; <1MOA, often <0.5 with me prone and front bipod. It's just the ES and SD of the loads I don't like.
 
Saturday I compared WSP, CCI 550, CCI 400 and CCI #41 in .357Magnum (RBH 6-1/2" and Colt Lawman 4"). All were loaded with 3.3gr. of Bullseye and lead/lubed 145gr. DEWC's (blue carnauba lube). I didn't chronograph, this was just a bang test - will they go bang? - and quasi "accuracy." Only difference I noticed is the #41's had a slightly smaller dimple than the WSP's and CCI 550's and maybe - just maybe - started the bullet before Bullseye got up to full pressure. That's about it. I was equally bad at hitting the black with all of the above so, no change there. In brief, if you can load with a "standard" small pistol primer, you can also load with a "magnum" small pistol, "standard" small rifle, and a #41 "MilSpec" small rifle primer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top