Deanimator
Member
It's entirely possible to argue Holocaust denial "rationally", using made up "facts", just as anti-gunners use made up "facts". Anti-gunners use exactly the same sort of deceit and misdirection as do Holocaust deniers.Deanimator,
Actually when you have a rational argument there are good facts on both sides. I just think that the people on the other side want to deal to much with the symptom and not the real problem.
When you try and say their side are racist, misogynist, or just wrong you are generalizing and that is the quickest way to negate your side of a debate. Especially when alot of them are the most non-racist, free loving people you will ever meet.
When somebody says that it'd be better if all Black people are disarmed, what is that BUT racist? I've had anti-gunners tell me that on any number of occasions. What do you call it when they hurl racial slurs at Black people who refuse to support oppressive gun controls when ordered to?
When somebody compares opponents of oppressive gun controls to "over-educated Jewish lawyers, opposed to prayer in schools", what is that BUT anti-Semitic? What do you call it when a former BATF agent PRAISES the Nazi gun control laws, because "ANY GERMAN CITIZEN" could own a gun? What do you call it when it takes WEEKS to get him to answer the simple question, "Were Jews 'GERMAN CITIZENS' in NSDAP Germany?"
When somebody says that women shouldn't be allowed to have guns because they'll hysterically shoot men who stop them to ask directions, what is that BUT misogynistic?
How long have you been debating anti-gunners? I've been doing it online since the mid '80s, and face to face for far longer. I talk to these people and see what they have to say, pretty much every day. I know what they think, because they TELL me what they think.