I found a link on THR a few years back. A little search should get you hooked up. Worth the effort.Any links or is this just an open ender?
I found a link on THR a few years back. A little search should get you hooked up. Worth the effort.Any links or is this just an open ender?
Not for a while.
Interesting factoid: he ran for Congress as a Democrat.
As far as his books go (I believe the other one was "Foreign and Domestic"), they were okay reads, but a little over the top for me, nothing I'd re-read as gospel. I much prefer the writings of A. American and J. L. Bourne (the "Tomorrow War") and William Forschten in this particular genre of America gone wrong ... Bourne and Forschten in particular are well-educated, describe technology much more effectively and are simply better writers.
And these books are readily available at normal prices, can sometimes be found at Barnes and Nobel.
He was tarred as being part of "the militia movement" of the era, without cause or evidence nor warrant thereof.Huh, I did not know that.
Found this:
Downloadable PDF for $8
https://www.etsy.com/listing/650512...otSCN7Kl9Tup996oK-b0kkGXJw09pBlxoCe8UQAvD_BwE
I started reading it, about 1/2 way through.
couple small issues:
1. He says Kennedy was on his boat shooting an select fire AR-15, wouldn't that be an M16 since the AR15 was semi only?*
2. When Henry saw all the pictures in the book about the Nazi camps and comments about how some of the guns are not loaded, the picture quality at that time wouldn't be good enough for him to tell imaging and printing quality wasn't that good yet.
3. Henry's paper that got am A+ reads more like a modern paper than a 1980's paper.
4. The M16, AR-15, etc were designed by Eugene Stoner, not Gene Stoner. Some people don't like their name being shortened and I've never seen his shortened elsewhere.
Since we sometimes pick out inaccuracies in anti's logic, I find it a good idea to correct any in ours no matter how minor so as to not give them a hole to exploit.