So I have a Ruger No.1 rifle that I'd like to try shooting at longer distances (500 yards - ish). I want to come up with the more accurate reload with higher BC bullets than what I've been using.
Up till now I've just used the same load I developed for my AR15. This load was developed with saving money in mind. I wasn't as worried about accuracy since I'm shooting iron sights on that rifle anyway. I was happy with "minute of paper plate" at 200 yards (about the longest I can shoot with irons I'm nearsighted LOL). Load consists of 55gr Hornady flat base soft points, mixed head stamp once fired brass (my friend calls it "range poop"), H335 powder (25.0gr), and CCI No. 41 primers.
This load is OK out of the Ruger. Gets just shy of 3,100 FPS. But it drops pretty fast past about 300 yards and the wind really pushes it around. So I'm interested in higher BC and velocity.
From what I can tell the rifle's twist rate is about 1:12 1/2 inches. Used the "cleaning rod" trick several times and the average result was about 12.5
So finding a better BC bullet that will still stabilize with this twist rate I think will be a challenge. I bought a box of Horandy 53gr VMAX bullets, they've got a BC of 0.290, this is the highest I've seen for anything in the lighter-than-55gr category.
I think I will stick with H335 as my powder, I've had good luck with it so far.
I bought a box of 100 Norma brass, I'm told that it's supposed to be more consistent from one case to the next than most brands are. Hope this is true...
Not sure what primers to use. I have CCI small rifle, CCI No. 41 "mil spec", and Winchester small rifle. No idea which of these is supposed to be the most consistent, or if I should just buy something totally different?
Other questions I have are bullet seating depth / COAL, and full length sizing brass vs just neck sizing.
On the seating depth, I took a fired piece of brass, and pressed the case mouth lightly against the floor to dent it inward just enough to hold a bullet. I put one of the 53gr VMAX bullets in the case (leaving it really long) and pushed it up into the chamber of the Ruger. Removed it and measured with calipers. I believe that this should give me the COAL where the bullet starts to touch the rifling. I did this several times and got very slightly different results each time:
2.313
2.330
2.339
2.339 (again)
2.342
2.345
2.344
Interesting that every time I tried this the number got a little bigger. I wonder if my method of testing is flawed? Averaging these numbers gave me 2.336 COAL
I understand that touching the rifling is bad and that you want to seat slightly deeper than this number. I'm just not sure by how much. In the past I've always gone with what the book suggests as the COAL but I know that this can vary alot from one rifle to the next and I want to tailor these rounds to this specific rifle as much as possible.
The book recommends 2.240 for this bullet. 2.240 vs 2.336 is a big difference though. Is that normal? Where should I start at? I was thinking 2.315, but not sure if that's enough margin for error
I tried this same method with the 55gr soft points I've been shooting and the numbers I got from my test were actually pretty close to the number in the book:
2.212
2.209
2.211
Book says 2.200 for that bullet so this is just about dead on. So if this bullet is so close to the book, why is the VMAX so far off?
On the full size vs neck size thing, I've always just full sized all my .223 ammo, because I've been told you have to for semi-auto rifles. I am told that neck size only is the preferred method for bolt actions. But I have no idea what the right method is for falling block actions?
Sorry this is such a long post. I just want to get this right (hopefully on the first try ha ha). So any info/advice you guys could share would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
Up till now I've just used the same load I developed for my AR15. This load was developed with saving money in mind. I wasn't as worried about accuracy since I'm shooting iron sights on that rifle anyway. I was happy with "minute of paper plate" at 200 yards (about the longest I can shoot with irons I'm nearsighted LOL). Load consists of 55gr Hornady flat base soft points, mixed head stamp once fired brass (my friend calls it "range poop"), H335 powder (25.0gr), and CCI No. 41 primers.
This load is OK out of the Ruger. Gets just shy of 3,100 FPS. But it drops pretty fast past about 300 yards and the wind really pushes it around. So I'm interested in higher BC and velocity.
From what I can tell the rifle's twist rate is about 1:12 1/2 inches. Used the "cleaning rod" trick several times and the average result was about 12.5
So finding a better BC bullet that will still stabilize with this twist rate I think will be a challenge. I bought a box of Horandy 53gr VMAX bullets, they've got a BC of 0.290, this is the highest I've seen for anything in the lighter-than-55gr category.
I think I will stick with H335 as my powder, I've had good luck with it so far.
I bought a box of 100 Norma brass, I'm told that it's supposed to be more consistent from one case to the next than most brands are. Hope this is true...
Not sure what primers to use. I have CCI small rifle, CCI No. 41 "mil spec", and Winchester small rifle. No idea which of these is supposed to be the most consistent, or if I should just buy something totally different?
Other questions I have are bullet seating depth / COAL, and full length sizing brass vs just neck sizing.
On the seating depth, I took a fired piece of brass, and pressed the case mouth lightly against the floor to dent it inward just enough to hold a bullet. I put one of the 53gr VMAX bullets in the case (leaving it really long) and pushed it up into the chamber of the Ruger. Removed it and measured with calipers. I believe that this should give me the COAL where the bullet starts to touch the rifling. I did this several times and got very slightly different results each time:
2.313
2.330
2.339
2.339 (again)
2.342
2.345
2.344
Interesting that every time I tried this the number got a little bigger. I wonder if my method of testing is flawed? Averaging these numbers gave me 2.336 COAL
I understand that touching the rifling is bad and that you want to seat slightly deeper than this number. I'm just not sure by how much. In the past I've always gone with what the book suggests as the COAL but I know that this can vary alot from one rifle to the next and I want to tailor these rounds to this specific rifle as much as possible.
The book recommends 2.240 for this bullet. 2.240 vs 2.336 is a big difference though. Is that normal? Where should I start at? I was thinking 2.315, but not sure if that's enough margin for error
I tried this same method with the 55gr soft points I've been shooting and the numbers I got from my test were actually pretty close to the number in the book:
2.212
2.209
2.211
Book says 2.200 for that bullet so this is just about dead on. So if this bullet is so close to the book, why is the VMAX so far off?
On the full size vs neck size thing, I've always just full sized all my .223 ammo, because I've been told you have to for semi-auto rifles. I am told that neck size only is the preferred method for bolt actions. But I have no idea what the right method is for falling block actions?
Sorry this is such a long post. I just want to get this right (hopefully on the first try ha ha). So any info/advice you guys could share would be very much appreciated. Thanks!