remember that guy who had 600+ guns confiscated?

Status
Not open for further replies.

30 cal slob

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
2,091
Location
Location, Location!
:scrutiny:

Police: Stolen Guns Traced To Store
June 15, 2007 By DAVID OWENS, Courant Staff Writer
A Somers man arrested on 28 counts of first-degree larceny and firearm theft pilfered those weapons from a gun shop where he would occasionally help out, according to the search warrant investigators drafted before entering Brian H. McClelland's home.

McClelland, 63, of 159 Mountain View Road, was released on $1 million bail and is due in Superior Court in Rockville on June 26 for arraignment.

State police began looking at McClelland in early May after a trooper in the department's special licenses and firearms unit noticed that McClelland "had been purchasing an exorbitant number of guns in the [past] 17 months," the affidavit accompanying the search warrant says. From Dec. 28, 2005, to May 31, 2007, McClelland had bought 537 guns from the same gun shop, Riverview Sales of East Windsor. Of those guns, 281 were handguns and 256 were long guns. All were purchased legally, police said, and none had been reported stolen.

Still, the sheer volume of gun purchases raised eyebrows with state police.

In early June, the owner of Riverview Sales, David E. Laguercia, contacted the federal Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives to report that his business was missing 33 guns and that he had recorded video of a store assistant stealing at least two guns, as well as some other items. That assistant, according to the warrant, was McClelland.

Laguercia said Thursday that McClelland had become a good customer of Riverview Sales, even a friend.

"He seemed to be a down-to-earth kind of guy," Laguercia said. McClelland was a high-volume buyer, Laguercia said, and was purchasing the guns for his collection. "He didn't have any specific interest," Laguercia said. "He was a collector, and he was enhancing his collection. Naturally, every once in a while a company would come out with a limited production run and he'd want one of them."

Laguercia said he noticed shortly after moving his store from Enfield to East Windsor that the inventory in some areas seemed "light or missing," according to the affidavit.

Laguercia said he began to suspect McClelland was stealing items but lacked proof. He checked the store's security videos and saw McClelland take a handgun and walk out of the store, then return empty-handed. The incident occurred while McClelland was alone in the store, according to the warrant.

At that point, Laguercia closed the store for a few days to inventory its stock. He told McClelland he was closing the store so he could visit and care for a sick parent.

During that inventory, Laguercia determined that 33 guns - 32 hand guns and a rifle - were missing. That's when he contacted federal authorities, according to the affidavit.

It was those 33 guns police were looking for when they searched McClelland's home June 8 and 9. Police say 28 stolen weapons were among the 601 guns seized at his house. There is no suggestion in the arrest warrant affidavit that the other guns in McClelland's collection were stolen.

McClelland, who could not be reached for comment, appeared to be in solid financial shape, Laguercia said. Laguercia said he couldn't understand why McClelland would steal the guns.

"That's the question everybody asks," Laguercia said. "He didn't need money. He had the means."

Contact David Owens at [email protected] .
 
The shop lifting sounds really foolish and bizzare, probably an OCD thing. If he could afford to buy 500 plus guns, there was no point in stealing a few on the side.

The sad thing is, the police will probably melt down his whole collection thinking they are fighting crime. :(
 
A gun dealer I have known since 1968 had an employee stealing from him. He took hundreds of guns over several years time, selling them on the street to anyone with cash. Being an employee he was able to cover up the missing guns for a long time. Turned out the crook had a gambling habit and he was not a good gambler. Needed to cover his loses with the bookies.

The dealer was really hurt because he had treated the guy like family. Gave him a used car when he needed transportation, let him live in his home at times to help him out, what can you say?
 
Good point. Never thought about it that way. Over 600 guns confiscated and destroyed will be a nice re-election gold star.

What law would give them the right to destroy the guns in his collection that were legally owned?
 
pacodelahoya:

Your word choice, "thieves"...hmmm. You are too nice. I can't say the word that I think describes people who steal! What is the loss figure? 15%? It's pretty bad.

Doc2005
 
What law would give them the right to destroy the guns in his collection that were legally owned?

If he is found guilty of a felony, he looses his rights to own guns. The guns were confiscated and since the guy can't legally own them, they will sit in an evidence room for all eternity? But, I may very well be wrong. I ain't no lawyer.
 
Leaving out the stolen guns, what's wrong with purchasing ~600 guns? If he purchased them legally, they haven't been used in crimes, and nobody's been hurt or threatened, so what? I own about a dozen guns. Whoopee. I'd love to be able to afford 600.

Now, with the stolen guns, that's a totally different story. Big no-no and he deserves what he's got coming.

/hates thieves
 
I dont understand why someone with 569 legally purchased guns would go and steal 32. It doesnt make sense. But he stole the guns he should do the time. But unfortunantly he will probably be out again in about 5 years.....

I agree that the guns will probably not just "sit around" in the evidence room... some of them will grow legs and walk.........
 
State police began looking at McClelland in early May after a trooper in the department's special licenses and firearms unit noticed that McClelland "had been purchasing an exorbitant number of guns in the [past] 17 months,"

?????
 
from a financial viewpoint, i wouldn't be pressing charges. this guy did a lot of business. from the betrayal side, i would throw the book at him.
 
The way the article read to me was that the police didn't necessarily think that there was anything wrong with buying that many guns, just that it made them take notice, and I don't think that's a bad thing, actually. If he was just buying them for his collection, nothing would have come of it, but if he was buying them and reselling them to criminals that would be a different story. It's the same way for a lot of things, if one person buys a lot of it it raises eyebrows.

If I buy too much Claratin in a month I'd surely have the police looking at me, and as long as I can explain why I need so much Claratin I'd be fine. But if they found that I was using it to make drugs and sell them on the street, I'd have some serious problems on my hands. Same kind of thing in my mind. I could also translate that example to diesel fuel and fertilizer, and a lot of other things.

Not that I enjoy the fact that the .gov is looking into our lives constantly,but if I could somehow magically afford to buy 600 guns in 17 months (that's pretty much a new gun every single day), I'd probably be prepared to explain my actions to whoever was asking.

Has anybody who's reading this thread been buying a gun every day for more than a year? If so, perhaps you could let us know if that's attracted any attention (from someone other than your wife). ;)
 
Every time the 'Government' or the 'News media' tells us about these things I remember what they 'got wrong' about Waco, Ruby Ridge, when I was in Iraq, those guys at Duke university, the VT shootings...

What I'm saying is I believe NOTHING 'They' say.
-Although it might be 100% correct... I STILL don't trust them.
 
Where did this happen? Do the Jack Booted Thugs normally check firearm sales manually, or was their computer set to look for frequent buyers, and kick them out for indivual inspection? I have never believed that they dont have a master database.:fire:
 
Elrod
In CT you have to call in every gun to the state (they are who you call for the NICS check) that is transfered fro a FFL to a privite person to the state, you also have to send in a form to them with all the info on the person and the gun so that they can enter it into there computer. So if the same people see the same name almost daly then them might keep a eye on him or her.
 
I remember a story I think we discussed here a few years back. The POLICE raided a home in CA because of a large electric bill thinking pot growing. It was a woman with many children with alot of washing and drying going on.
 
Elrod
In CT you have to call in every gun to the state (they are who you call for the NICS check) that is transfered fro a FFL to a privite person to the state, you also have to send in a form to them with all the info on the person and the gun so that they can enter it into there computer. So if the same people see the same name almost daly then them might keep a eye on him or her.
The DPS-3 Form is retained one each by the
*seller
*buyer
*DPS
*Buyer's Local Police Chief
 
The idea that all seized guns are "melted down" by the police is actually false. Sure, some jurisdictions do that that are particularly anti-gun. Also any gun with a defaced or missing serial number must be destroyed. Any gun that would not be legal to sell privately must be destroyed, such as full-autos (unless a LEO wants them) and any gun that has been modified from a 'legal" version to an "illegal" version (such as Semiauto rifles converted t ofull auto, sawed-off shotguns, etc).

But many, many police evidence lockers are sold bulk at wholesale discount prices to large gun resellers and dealers. A large place where I live regularly buys seized or evidence guns from PDs across the country to sell as used. They get in some nice stuff. A guy that works there told me somebody must have been a Ruger collector because they got in a bunch of Mini-14s, Mini-30s, PC9s, 44 Deerslayers, 10/22s etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top