r1derbike
Member
That was a really honest review. Thanks for the link. Didn't realize the bore axis was so low. Should be great on recoil.
That was a really honest review. Thanks for the link. Didn't realize the bore axis was so low. Should be great on recoil.
I saw one yesterday and had a chance to compare it with a used Sig P232 in the case. They are almost exactly the same size.I can't seem to get a good idea of the size of this gun.
Ah, so.....Honorable Master!Going to wait a year or so 'til the teething issues are addressed. Then look again.
Just picked-up an XDm 9mm 4.5 in., so good for a big boat anchor ATM. NIB, half a year free range membership, lane and ammo discounts. Couldn't pass that one up.
I'm really flummoxed I shoot my XD-S .45 better, though. Could be the 1300 rounds through it.
Have to retrain for light recoil and long sight radius, I guess?
Will be watching/reading the reviews on the Rem., all I may find...
For a carry/concealed pistol, I am not sure what a bull barrel will do in terms of perfecting it. What sort of groups are you expecting at self defense ranges? To me, this is not a target pistol, rather a short range, point and clic.Well, it sure sounds like the gun is a great idea, no matter the details of Remington's rollout (finish, fit, etc.), and that is ultimately what will matter in the long run. Soft shooting, easy racking, low bore axis, and apparently pretty accurate sounds pretty infallible to me, even if the quality is commensurate with the price.
I'm really itching to see where modification can take these; match barrel (heavy barrel?), compensation, melt down, long/short slides, finish options, fancy coatings, trigger adjustment, grip replacements, frame mods, grip chops; there's a wide open playfield for experimentation, and it sounds like the gun is a good enough platform that it would be worth exploring.
TCB