RMR's own line of Thick Plated bullets

Status
Not open for further replies.

LiveLife

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Messages
32,946
Location
Northwest Coast
Rocky Mountain Reloading is a "mom and pop" operation with a new baby, a true American dream story in the making and Jake has been an active participating member of THR for many years, actually last of vendors who still make time to interact with THR members answer questions and engage his customers' needs directly.

As a long supporter of "Where are there reloading components" thread, I have noticed RMR started carrying a different "Thick Plated" bullets on their website. Since my lead level went from 8 to 12 making my doctor concerned and banned me from shooting at indoor ranges for the past 3 months, I wanted to try them out and see how they performed compared to other plated bullets I have been shooting. When I placed my order for 9mm/40S&W/45ACP along with RMR's lead bullets of the same calibers, Jake PMed/emailed me and told me they are his own line of plated bullets made for RMR good to 1500 fps (I will refer to these as RMR TP bullets).

I have an appointment with my doctor next week but got to start my range test of the bullets today (Yes, I did shoot at the indoor range but had my blood sample drawn last week ;)).

attachment.php


I started with 45ACP 230 gr TP RN bullet. If you look at the comparison picture above (Berry's/X-Treme 230 gr RN on the left and RMR 230 gr TP RN on the right), nose is shaped to allow for longer bullet base which results in more bearing surface to engage the rifling to stabilize the bullet in flight. Since the bullet base is longer, I anticipated shorter OAL/COL than other 230 gr RN bullets. Also, instead of the rounded flat bullet base, RMR TP bullet is "dished" which should act more like flat base lead bullet compared to bevel base lead bullet to expand the bullet base better to seal with the barrel.

Since my railed Sig 1911 has almost no leade with very quick start of rifling, I thought about getting a RIA Tactical with looser tapered chamber barrel but I found a used Citadel 1911 for a price I could not pass up. When I field stripped the pistol, inside looked like brand new and the range staff hinted only a couple of magazines were shot through. Fit and finish was better than RIA with tighter chamber so I bought the pistol.

attachment.php


Determining max/working OAL/COL:

Using Walkalong's excellent thread on determining max OAL/COL using the barrel, I determined 1.230" as the max OAL for Citadel 1911's barrel which also worked as the working OAL. For Sig 1911 barrel with almost no leade, I needed to use shorter 1.200" for max/working OAL. .471" taper crimp was used for both loads and picture above shows them next to factory PMC 230 gr FMJ round at 1.255"


Load Development:

Since I used shorter OAL that seated the bullet base deeper, I decided to use 5.0 gr of W231/HP-38 for the initial load test (I use 5.2 gr with Berry's/X-Treme 230 gr plated RN bullets typically loaded to 1.255"-1.262").

BTW, here's Hodgdon's current load data - http://www.hodgdonreloading.com/data/pistol
230 gr LRN W231/HP-38 Dia .452" OAL 1.200" Start 4.3 gr (699 fps) 12,200 CUP - Max 5.3 gr (834 fps) 16,900 CUP

230 gr HDY FMJ FP W231/HP-38 Dia .451" OAL 1.200" Start 4.2 gr (751 fps) 13,800 CUP - Max 5.3 gr (832 fps) 16,800 CUP


Range report:

Although I have not shot in the past three months, I managed to hit the target. :D Distance to target was 15 yards and Chip McCormick PowerMag and Wilson Combat 47D 8 round magazines were used without any feeding issues.

Sig 1911 - Since this pistol produced 2" shot groups at 25 yards using MBC 200 gr lead SWC (Bullseye #1) and 4.0 gr of Promo, I was curious how it shot the new bullets. POI was same as POA and produced 1.5" shot group. Since I was rusty from not shooting for 3 months, I think this bullet is capable of even greater accuracy with practice. Time will tell.

Citadel 1911 - This was a pleasant surprise and made me glad that I bought it over the RIA Tactical. POI was low and left of POA (I will drift and may file the front sight after more accuracy testing). Maybe I got warmed up shooting the Sig 1911 and did better with it as it produced smaller 1.25" shot group. Since I loaded only 12 rounds of each OAL, look forward to future range trips, especially at 25 yards.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • RMR TP 230 RN.jpg
    RMR TP 230 RN.jpg
    31.1 KB · Views: 1,817
  • RMR TP 230 RN 1200 vs 1230 vs PMC.jpg
    RMR TP 230 RN 1200 vs 1230 vs PMC.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 2,624
  • RMR 45 230 Citadel vs Sig 1911.jpg
    RMR 45 230 Citadel vs Sig 1911.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 2,537
Last edited:
I too, am using Jake's new bullets in 9mm. I am going to ask for a pistol rest of some kind this year for Christmas to test, sight in new handguns and will be able to tell a lot more then than me just relying on my shooting abilities offhand like I have to now. (obviously not a good test)

The bullets I bought from RMR are 9mm round nose thick plate and they load and shoot as good if not better than anyone elses I've used. The thick plating on them allows me to shoot the way I like to shoot, with heavy loads.

I have a thread running right now where I've been testing BE-86, and tested it with RMR's 9mm thick plate. They loaded very well on my LNL-AP, I didn't have problems with feeding or firing, and they were as accurate as the other plated bullets I use. It was only a preliminary test since I was testing the powder more than the bullets but they didn't let me down and proved as consistant as this new powder.

Jakes new bullets to me are at least as good as the best quality of plated bullets I've been buying, and maybe better.

The quality of these bullets are fantastic and I look forward to other calibers being added to his list.



Jake, here is my wish list: .312 (327 fed mag) .357 mag, and 41 mag.
No one makes plated bullets for these calibers that are thick plate so we have to shoot sub sonic with them. It's hard for me to keep these subsonic but I know start up costs will prohibit this, at least at first.

By the way BDS, I can't see the pictures you posted.
 
I uploaded the pictures to THR server like other pictures I attach.

Can others see the pictures after you log into THR?
 
I ordered the following bullets:

45ACP - 230 gr RN
40S&W - 180 gr RNFP
9mm - 115 and 124 gr RN
380Auto - 100 gr RN

I have the following powders with plans to test Bullseye/Red Dot/Promo/Titegroup/W231/HP-38/Herco and let me know if you want testing with additional powders:

Bullseye
WST
Red Dot
Promo
Green Dot
N320
Titegroup
W231/HP-38
Unique (PIF to someone desperate for Unique)
Universal
Power Pistol
Herco
WSF
AutoComp
Will be picking up CFE Pistol/BE-86 when I find some
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the great post. You always have good factual information to share.:)
 
Looks like a good product. I have been a fan of Jakes company since he first posted here. Always provided fast shipping and great pricing.

I have always stuck to the policy of cast lead from Missouri Bullet and plated/jacketed from RMR.
 
I ordered the following bullets:

45ACP - 230 gr RN
40S&W - 180 gr RNFP
9mm - 115 and 124 gr RN
380Auto - 100 gr RN

I have the following powders with plans to test Bullseye/Red Dot/Promo/Titegroup/W231/HP-38/Herco and let me know if you want testing with additional powders:

Bullseye
WST
Red Dot
Promo
Green Dot
N320
Titegroup
W231/HP-38
Unique (PIF to someone desperate for Unique)
Universal
Power Pistol
Herco
WSF
AutoComp
Will be picking up CFE Pistol/BE-86 when I find some
bds, I am looking at ordering some of the 9mm 124gr RMR TP RN rounds. Currently I only have AutoComp powder. Do you have any testing data for this combination? I am currently looking at the following load data from Hodgdon's as a starting point:
124 GR. BERB HBRN TP
Winchester AutoComp .356" 1.150" 4.8 1,020 28,400 PSI 5.4 1,120 32,900 PSI
 
I planned to test some of my "known" accurate loads over the weekend but will gladly do a full powder workup for AutoComp with 9mm.

I am thinking 4.8/5.0/5.2 gr using 1.135"/1.150"/1.160" OAL.

Any other powder work up requests?
 
bluetopper said:
Hard to find any plated bullets that will be suitable for silhouette distances and power for 44 Mag.
Jake, do you have any plans to offer your "Thicker Plated" bullets in other calibers? < PM sent >
 
I planned to test some of my "known" accurate loads over the weekend but will gladly do a full powder workup for AutoComp with 9mm.

I am thinking 4.8/5.0/5.2 gr using 1.135"/1.150"/1.160" OAL.

Any other powder work up requests?

bds, Thanks for the range, especially the OAL. I was always wondering how you decide how to bracket the OAL.

I am also going to load some plated 40 S&W RNFP bullets using the HODGDON data. Suggestions regarding bracketing the OAL will be appreciated:
165 GR. BERB FP
Winchester AutoComp .400" 1.125" 6.3 1,051 25,900 PSI 7.0 1,171 33,300 PSI

Please don't work up any special loads based on my questions, since the last thing I want is to cost somebody else any money.
 
vaalpens said:
bds said:
full powder workup for AutoComp with 9mm.

I am thinking 4.8/5.0/5.2 gr using 1.135"/1.150"/1.160" OAL.
bds, Thanks for the range, especially the OAL. I was always wondering how you decide how to bracket the OAL.
For load development, using Walkalong's thread to determine the max/working OAL/COL to conduct the full powder workup allows using the longest cartridge length that will bring the bearing surface of the bullet (part that rides the rifling) closer to the start of rifling when powder ignites to minimize high pressure gas leakage for more consistent chamber pressures (which will produce more consistent muzzle velocities and smaller shot groups).

But with 9mm RN bullets with shorter bullet base like the "stepped" 124/125 gr lead RN and especially with 115 gr jacketed/plated RN with even shorter bullet base, using longer working OAL (like 1.160") with lower "target" powder charges often did not produce enough neck tension/initial chamber pressures to produce accuracy. For this reason and since I load for multiple pistols/barrels, I usually load lead "stepped" 124/125 gr RN to shorter 1.125" working OAL (I think reason why MBC/Dardas offers "non-stepped" RN bullets with longer bearing surface ;)) and 115/124 gr jacketed/plated RN to 1.135" working OAL.

So why/when do I use longer OAL/COL in some of my posts? That depends on powder being used and my desire to squeeze out as much accuracy from the load. With fluffy, slower burning powders like Herco, I calculate the max powder fill in case by subtracting the bullet length from the working OAL of 1.135". I fill the powder to this mark in case and weigh the powder charge. If the upper powder range I want to use for the load development will be compressed with 1.135" OAL, I need to use longer OAL that will still reliably feed/chamber from the magazine. I also use longer OAL with higher powder charges to reduce high pressure gas leakage for greater accuracy - http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=745656

I am also going to load some plated 40 S&W RNFP bullets using the HODGDON data. Suggestions regarding bracketing the OAL will be appreciated.
While 1.125" is the length many use for 40S&W TCFP bullets, many factory and aftermarket barrels will work with longer than SAAMI max of 1.135". When 1KPerDay tried to develop a match load with Berry's 180 gr plated TCFP bullet but could not identify an accurate load, I pushed the accuracy envelope with Glock/Lone Wolf barrels which allowed 1.149" max OAL with 1.145" working OAL. Since mixed range brass resized case length varies by a few thousandths which will vary the amount bullet's bearing surface will protrude above the case mouth when chambered rounds headspace with the chamber, I used 1.143" as the max working OAL to compensate for this case length variation.

Using longer than SAAMI max of 1.142" OAL and "threshold" powder charge of 6.1 gr Herco produced the most consistent accurate load - http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?p=9362819#post9362819

I know, some reloaders may think all this "numbers" related reloading is crazy/OCD but reloading is my hobby and accuracy is everything for me and I have fun trying to figure out what produces accuracy, even when I am using mixed range brass and not new brass.

I plan to test 40S&W loads at typical 1.125" and 1.142" lengths.

I hope this helped.
 
What Other Calibers Do You Want To See?

I am the Operations Director at Rocky Mountain Reloading.

First, let me tell you that I absolutely love this write-up. Thank you, BDS for a high quality and complimentary report of our products. We are striving to be the very best and this is a great kick start!

Now I need help from you and the other forum members. You've mentioned a desire for additional calibers of bullets. We are currently looking at which calibers and styles will sell the best in our new thickly plated bullet line. If you can please share the bullets you want to see and the quantities you shoot in a month or in a year, I would appreciate the feedback.

Happy Shooting!

Ryan
 
But with 9mm RN bullets with shorter bullet base like the "stepped" 124/125 gr lead RN and especially with 115 gr jacketed/plated RN with even shorter bullet base, using longer working OAL (like 1.160") with lower "target" powder charges often did not produce enough neck tension/initial chamber pressures to produce accuracy. For this reason and since I load for multiple pistols/barrels, I usually load lead "stepped" 124/125 gr RN to shorter 1.125" working OAL (I think reason why MBC/Dardas offers "non-stepped" RN bullets with longer bearing surface ;)) and 115/124 gr jacketed/plated RN to 1.135" working OAL.

bds, Thanks again for the comprehensive explanation. The detail and the numbers are some of the reasons I was drawn to reloading, outside the normal love for shooting and cost. The way you explained the details make sense to me, but it will probably take some time before I can go into that much detail since I am new to reloading. I first need to get the basics down, then start experiencing based on all the variables.

One question I have regarding the bearing surface of the 9mm or 40 S&W. Is there a minimum surface based on the weight, diameter or length of the bullet that needs to be inside the case to give enough neck tension? Also, are the hollow based 115gr 9mmm rounds designed with the hollow/concave base to give it more length/bearing surface like the 124gr, or purely to reduce/control gas leakage? Are the RMR 9mm thick plated 124gr bullets a flat base or a concave type base. It is difficult to see from the picture.

Thanks again for taking the time to answer my questions.
 
I am the Operations Director at Rocky Mountain Reloading.

First, let me tell you that I absolutely love this write-up. Thank you, BDS for a high quality and complimentary report of our products. We are striving to be the very best and this is a great kick start!

Now I need help from you and the other forum members. You've mentioned a desire for additional calibers of bullets. We are currently looking at which calibers and styles will sell the best in our new thickly plated bullet line. If you can please share the bullets you want to see and the quantities you shoot in a month or in a year, I would appreciate the feedback.

Happy Shooting!

Ryan

Ryan, You should start a thread for this, with a snazzy title, and you'll get a lot more play.
Jake got you pulling double duty, monitoring THR now?:)
 
Any other powder work up requests

B,
Not necessarily with thick plated or anything. But im a little curious, and you may already have all of this info from your past testing, but I'd like to see "Pistol" powder vs "Shotty" powder tested. Im pretty sure shotgun powders would more than hold their own as long as we're not rating metering or recoil. Though I'd like to know about that too.
 
If you can please share the bullets you want to see and the quantities you shoot in a month or in a year, I would appreciate the feedback.
30 carbine, good to 2000fps. Only shoot about 500 a year now, but would shoot more if I could get them for less than 15 cents per round, the price of Hornady short jackets the last time I bought them.

45 185gr HBFP, or 200RN in the same profile as your 230gr. 2-3000 per year.
 
B,

Not necessarily with thick plated or anything. But im a little curious, and you may already have all of this info from your past testing, but I'd like to see "Pistol" powder vs "Shotty" powder tested. Im pretty sure shotgun powders would more than hold their own as long as we're not rating metering or recoil. Though I'd like to know about that too.


The thing is many pistol powders are shotgun powders. The nature of pistol powders and shotgun powders is such that they interchange. Unique, considered the mother of all handgun powders, is a shotgun powder. Heck there is even load data out there for H110/W296. All of the "Dots" from Alliant count, even the favorite of many Hodgdon Longshot.
 
ljnowell said:
Potatohead said:
I'd like to see "Pistol" powder vs "Shotty" powder tested. Im pretty sure shotgun powders would more than hold their own as long as we're not rating metering or recoil. Though I'd like to know about that too.
The thing is many pistol powders are shotgun powders. The nature of pistol powders and shotgun powders is such that they interchange. Unique, considered the mother of all handgun powders, is a shotgun powder. All of the "Dots" from Alliant count, even the favorite of many Hodgdon Longshot.
As ljnowell posted, most popular pistol powders we use are also shotgun powders, even Unique. During the powder shortage since 2008, I read many reloaders and match shooters tried other shotgun powders like e3, American Select, 20/28, Solo 1000 and Steel with some success. In fact, American Select is next powder I would like to venture out to test in 9/40/45.
 
Potatohead said:
BKReloader said:
I am the Operations Director at Rocky Mountain Reloading.
Jake got you pulling double duty, monitoring THR now?
Probably listed under "... and other duties as assigned" :D

... need help from you and the other forum members. You've mentioned a desire for additional calibers of bullets ... share the bullets you want to see
I think 200 gr SWC for 45ACP would be good to add to your product line as it is a very popular bullet for 45 shooters (as with me). 200 gr RN would be my next suggestion as 45 shooters with pistols that won't reliably feed/extract 200 gr SWC would load 200 gr RN at better price point than 230 gr RN.

I shoot 9mm 115/124 gr RN more than any other caliber/nose profiles and with plans for 9mm AR carbines in the future, thicker plated bullets rated to 1500 fps is a plus for me. Right now, I can reload 9mm for similar cost as 22LR hence the reason for adding 9mm carbines. I will be testing 115/124 gr RN with Red Dot/Promo and if accuracy is good enough (I think it will), may become my designated 9mm carbine load.

In 40S&W, I like 180 gr bullet weight which you already carry. Some shooters may prefer 165 gr weight for lower price point (bullet cost is the biggest factor in reloading as slight increase in powder charge won't cost as much as big drop in bullet price). If you do add 165 gr bullet, do keep the same RNFP nose profile of the 180 gr for easier feeding/chambering than TCFP.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top