Don't be surprise if we see a reprise of this same unholy alliance to destroy Ron Paul.
I won't be. Not at all.
Don't be surprise if we see a reprise of this same unholy alliance to destroy Ron Paul.
yupActually a smear campaign would be a good sign, it would show he was gaining enough traction to represent a serious threat.
-He's from Texas. Texas is where Bush is from. The American people, for
better or worse, will not elect another president from Texas in the forseeable
future. It's dumb, but there it is.
After you're all done fellating Ron Paul, I'd like to point out a few things.
If Ron Paul could use the bully pulpit to popularize his ideas like another Ron was known to do, it won't matter what the House and Senate want. The people will call them and demand they support him.How about some Libertarian House and Senate Candidates running as Republicans so Ron Paul could maybe have some like minded members if he is elected.
He is the opposite of an ideologue. He bases his understanding of government and the law on history, observed reality, and a firm grasp of human nature. An ideologue, on the other hand, adopts his pet ideas first (because they sound good), then seeks to force reality to fit into them. I hope you can see the difference. Carl Marx was the consummate ideologue. The Founders were realists, i.e., the opposite of ideologues, because they based their views on history, observed reality, and a firm grasp of human nature.In summary, he strikes me as an ideologue.
The establishment of neither party will not allow someone like Ron Paul to upset the status quo.