My guess would be because they want to move customers to the more expensive newer models like the Max.Does anyone know why Ruger ceased production of the LC9? Even though I never owned one (but intended to!), it seemed like an ideal concealed-carry pistol, maybe the best.
Also a good point. Once the EC9 was released it probably hurt LC9 sales even worse. For around $100 less all you give up is the ability to replace the sights.Probably because they thought they were progressing upwards with the Max-9?
I don’t know, but at least the EC9s variation is still in production….
Ruger® EC9s® Centerfire Pistol Models
www.ruger.com
Very true. Especially when you consider mags and holsters. SR series, Americans, Security 9, P series, LC series, and I’m sure more.But Ruger seems to have a problem sticking to a platform. It's why I now buys S&W
I tried out the LC9 when they first came out and I agree, the trigger was horrible, and I didn't buy the pistol.The original LC9 had a horrible trigger pull. The LC9s was much better. The EC9s is still on their website and is essentially the same gun with some money saving features. I assume they are still making it. I've had examples of both and if looking for that type of gun on a tight budget I'd highly recommend the EC9s.
I agree 100% .. the trigger on the original LC9 was heavy when compared to modern striker fired pistols .. but when compared to a stock J Frame it was fantastic… it was much better than the KT P-11 .. which was the only semi automatic pistol that had me scratching my headThere’s an argument to be made for the original DAO trigger of the LC9 as a pocket gun. That long, heavy trigger was unlikely to be pulled by accident.