adcoch1
Member
Basically what I'm hoping for. I would hate to have to replace it, the trigger is so smooth by now it would be a shame to start over smoothing out a new one...
I would send it to Ruger. Barrels just do not loosen up for no reason and I would be suspicious that something else is wrong.
It wasn't a problem with the design, it was an assembly problem which, according to the information I've seen, was traced back to a single employee on one shift who was over-tightening the barrels on some guns, not all of them. It never affected the entire Redhawk line, even during the time that the separations were actually happening.
Well I'll be calling them tomorrow if my wife doesn't go into labor (due date today with our fourth) or my boss doesn't keep me too late. We'll see what they say...
Thanks! We are pretty excited waiting for him to get here. Didn't get a call in today, gonna try tomorrow...Congrats!
Get the label. It is going to cost about $70 to shipif it tops $30 they have a $30 shipping label you can buy.
FedEx didn't make you send a handgun via Overnight?will take a week or so...
NopeFedEx didn't make you send a handgun via Overnight?
I was able to find an online report of one person who had the problem with his revolver. He reported that the serial number on his gun was: 501-10445. Based on Ruger's website, that would place the production date sometime in 1984.
I found another similar report where the owner indicated his Redhawk was made in 1983.
If it's in the 500 series it might be worth a call. The BOB is a pretty remote place to have your gun fall apart in the middle of...Thanks for the info, JohnKSa. My Redhawk (sn 500 299xx), purchased new, was apparently made sometime in 1982 or 1983; leaving me with the question if mine is one of the affected revolvers. I don't have many rounds through it and would hate to have the barrel fall off when trout fishing on a stream in the Bob Marshall Wilderness in grizzly country. Guess I might should contact Ruger for a definitive answer...