S&W 34-1 interesting!

Another one interesting Smith from the local honey hole shop.

disclaimer: Not buying

But, has anybody ever seen one? looks like a real nice shooter

View attachment 1178930
That one would be hard one for me to pass on as well. Now that I'm thinking about it, I wouldn't pass. It would be going home with me. Lol. Looks like your honey hole has some nice revolvers.
 
I would have bought that on the spot. Those kit guns start at $1000 in my neck of the world.
Love my Kit Gun and yes, it does get worn and shot on quite a few Wheelgun Wednesday.

View attachment 1179057

View attachment 1179058

View attachment 1179059
That one would be hard one for me to pass on as well. Now that I'm thinking about it, I wouldn't pass. It would be going home with me. Lol. Looks like your honey hole has some nice revolvers.
You guys are the worst Enabled! I do have some period correct grips for the Kit gun.

Look if it’s still there today. I’ll
put $200 down on it. They do have 90day layaway! I swear I got a Smith & Western problem !
 
The J frame 22’s, to me, are a good match of frame with caliber. The revolver at the bottom is J frame model 35. I had no idea until about two years ago that Smith ever made a 6” barrel 22lr in the J frame. Not really a kit gun but had to include it with the others.

View attachment 1179077
From smallest to biggest! DANG!
 
Yes, the Model 34 and Model 63 are nice 22 LR revolvers. The Model 34 is reasonably priced in my area, the Model 63 demands a premium price.

I like the Model 317 for its light weight but the Model 34 and 63 shoot better due to their weight.
I agree on shooting the AirLite Model 317’s, those are surprisingly tough to shoot at distances beyond 7-10 yards for me. The combination of the light weight, rimfire trigger pull and V-notch rear/Hi-Viz front sights aren’t the best for my eyes. I replaced the rear sight blade for a square-notch on my 317 and it helped, but it is still not a tack driver for me.

IMG_0669.jpeg

And you certainly aren’t kidding about the prices on the Model 63’s!

Back in 2020 I kept bidding on ones listed on GB and they were commanding crazy bids to take them home. They were being bid up so high that I bought a blued 10” Ruger Mk IV and a walnut/stainless 10/22 RSI from Buds, and I paid OTD for both less than just the winning bids were on the 63’s. :oops:

That’s when I started checking out the Model 34. In late 2021 I paid a bit more for my .22/.32 Kit Gun than half what Model 63’s were going for. It’s not stainless steel, but if that is an issue the Taurus 94 or 317in the safe could do (and hold 3 more shots, too.)

It looks like Enablers Unanimous has struck again! Good luck @Mark_Mark, hopefully you will soon bring another one home to the nest. :thumbup: Let us know what you think when you get it home and go shoot it.:D

Stay safe.
 
I agree on shooting the AirLite Model 317’s, those are surprisingly tough to shoot at distances beyond 7-10 yards for me. The combination of the light weight, rimfire trigger pull and V-notch rear/Hi-Viz front sights aren’t the best for my eyes. I replaced the rear sight blade for a square-notch on my 317 and it helped, but it is still not a tack driver for me.

View attachment 1179081

And you certainly aren’t kidding about the prices on the Model 63’s!

Back in 2020 I kept bidding on ones listed on GB and they were commanding crazy bids to take them home. They were being bid up so high that I bought a blued 10” Ruger Mk IV and a walnut/stainless 10/22 RSI from Buds, and I paid OTD for both less than just the winning bids were on the 63’s. :oops:

That’s when I started checking out the Model 34. In late 2021 I paid a bit more for my .22/.32 Kit Gun than half what Model 63’s were going for. It’s not stainless steel, but if that is an issue the Taurus 94 or 317in the safe could do (and hold 3 more shots, too.)

It looks like Enablers Unanimous has struck again! Good luck @Mark_Mark, hopefully you will soon bring another one home to the nest. :thumbup: Let us know what you think when you get it home and go shoot it.:D

Stay safe.
I should really look into a modern target .22 revolvers!
 
I know we’re talking S&W here, but, Charter Arms makes the Pathfinder 22LR - 2” with fixed sights and a 4.2” model with sights. For around $400 NIB hard to beat. I have had 3 or 4 of the Bulldogs over the years, still have one, great little pocket pistol. I’ve been considering on of these 4” models which is also made in 22 mag. 8 shot as well.

 
I know we’re talking S&W here, but, Charter Arms makes the Pathfinder 22LR - 2” with fixed sights and a 4.2” model with sights. For around $400 NIB hard to beat. I have had 3 or 4 of the Bulldogs over the years, still have one, great little pocket pistol. I’ve been considering on of these 4” models which is also made in 22 mag. 8 shot as well.

I never tried a Charter Arms gun. I love reliable & affordable guns!
 
Yep. That's us, a bunch of enablers. see a cool old Smith, buy it. Repeat as necessary.
very proud of myself today, did not go to the shop, even tho I was 5 miles away and had time!

Honey Hole Shop always got something Cool & Rare! So it’s not like I’m missing out.

Need to concentrate on DA revolvers shooting and follow thur!

Time to be one with the Sword and not a Sword Collector
 
very proud of myself today, did not go to the shop, even tho I was 5 miles away and had time!

Honey Hole Shop always got something Cool & Rare! So it’s not like I’m missing out.

Need to concentrate on DA revolvers shooting and follow thur!

Time to be one with the Sword and not a Sword Collector
There's always tomorrow. The shop will still be there.
 
The M35 6” is the descendant of the Heavy Frame Target originating with an order by Phil Bekeart in 1911. They obviously had a different idea of what was heavy for a .22 back then.
 
I don’t love the “tight” feeling J frame double action. My bigger Smiths have a lovely, smooth pull. The J frames I’ve shot seem to have a pull that’s theoretically smooth but in actuality is heavy and short enough that it feels abrupt and makes me want to yank the trigger rather than squeezing. Just not as much fun to shoot IMO.
 
I don’t love the “tight” feeling J frame double action. My bigger Smiths have a lovely, smooth pull. The J frames I’ve shot seem to have a pull that’s theoretically smooth but in actuality is heavy and short enough that it feels abrupt and makes me want to yank the trigger rather than squeezing. Just not as much fun to shoot IMO.
The I frame preceded the J frame and had a leaf spring instead of the coil spring to power the hammer. The pull was much smoother.

It is possible to convert the J frame to a leaf spring. All it takes is $$ and the right parts.

Kevin
 
I don’t love the “tight” feeling J frame double action. My bigger Smiths have a lovely, smooth pull. The J frames I’ve shot seem to have a pull that’s theoretically smooth but in actuality is heavy and short enough that it feels abrupt and makes me want to yank the trigger rather than squeezing. Just not as much fun to shoot IMO.
Yeah, I agree about the K frames. IMHO the Models 17/18 actions are amazing, in rimfire revolvers I think they are the best of the bunch.

Now my new Model 617 10-shot DA pull is… awful. I just can’t get that “wall” out of the middle of the DA trigger stroke, so a smoooooth DA pull on my 17/18 turns into smooth…STAAAACK…bang with the 617. That has not been conducive to decent DA accuracy at all 😞

The Model 34/317 trigger is typical J frame just like you describe, a bit cramped but useable.

Stay safe.
 
Back
Top