S&W Shield 9mm vs XDs 9mm

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
196
Location
Texas
346fd920-e2b7-4318-8be1-e10953fc3cdf_zps752aa119.gif

I picked up both of these over the last two weeks and thought I would take a pic and share a few thoughts for those trying to decide between the two.

As you can see they are both the same size, both are in 9mm, and both conceal the same. If you are trying to decide I think the determining factor will come down to ergonomics, sights, trigger, price, and availability.

I would also say up front that, in my not so humble opinion, either of these two guns kick the tar out of the other compact 9s on the market that are competing with it (Beretta Nano, Ruger LC9, Sig P290, Kahr, ect.)

Sights

Both sights are very usable out of the box. The XDs comes equipped with a red fiber optic insert on the front sight. Springfield provides an extra red and gree fiber optic rod and detailed instructions on how to change out the insert. The rear is a standard two-dot affair.

The Shield comes with very useable white 3-dot sights.

Both sight sets are metal.

I think that if you are inclined toward night sites on a carry gun it is a wash. If you want to use the standard sight set, switch to the green fiber optic on the XDs and call it good. The green FO rod on the XDs will stand out better in low light than the S&W white-dots.

Personally, I run 10-8 performance sights on all of my handguns. 10-8 offers a rear sight for the Shield which puts it in a win category for me.

Trigger Pull

Of the 5 M&P series pistols I have had the Shield has the best of of the trigger out of the box. The XDs trigger is better however. I know there will be at least one guy come along talking about how magical the trigger is on their Shield and that the XD they had sucked. Blah Blah, the majority of the time you will get a better trigger with the XDs between these two guns. Just dry-fire the Shield at the store to check if the trigger pull is acceptable to you. If not factor in the cost for an Apex kit.

Ergonomics

The XDs comes with an interchangeable backstrap. The Shield does not.

The XDs grip is more aggressively textured.

The XDs has a grip safety, and the Shield has a thumb safety. The Shield's thumb safety is unobtrusive enough that you would not need to use it, however, it would be difficult to disengage in a hurry without some serious practice. Some folks do not like a grip safety. It doesn’t bother me but it could be cause some concern from a reliability standpoint.

The XDs has a single slot picatinny rail. The Shield does not. This is worth the extra $100 if you also plan for this gun to do bedside duty.

The XDs seems to have a slightly higher bore-axis. Not enough to be concerned in my opinion.

As far as holding the gun in hand, personally I like the XDs grip texture, however, my wife prefers the Shield.

From an overall ergonomics standpoint, I would let the interchangeable backstrap and light rail make the decision for me.

Price

I paid $470 out-the-door for the Shield and just over $100 more for the XDs. Shields are harder to find generally.
 
Last edited:
I am curious in the recoil difference of the two...

Isn't this the other way around?

No, the Shield does not have a backstrap piece that comes off, despite looking like it does.
 
In the polymer compact 9mm category, I still prefer the Walther PPS
The PPS is ok, but almost $100 separates it from the 'Shield'. I would rather fill cart with some groceries then fork it over for the pistol. I see zero reason to pick XDs 9x19 over the the S&W as the price gap is even larger. Why fork over CART FULL of high quality groceries over to Springfield Armory?
 
Pablo, . . . simple. I prefer the look of the XDs over the Shield. I prefered the way the grip felt of the XDs over the Shield. I liked the trigger feel of the XDs over the Shield. I much prefer the grip safety over [basically] no safety [which is how I would deal with the Shield, since it is small, and would rather not have to think about taking a safety off if I had to use it in a quick action.

Just to give my opinion. Your mileage may vary.
 
How do these guns shoot?

Do you plan on comparing the ease of hitting the target quickly and accurately?

Accuracy Comparisons?

Follow up shot comparisons?

I'm considering both of these as well as the PPS.
 
I am curious in the recoil difference of the two...
I don't know about the XDS but ladies have shot my 9mm Shield. They like it so well they are looking for their own.
 
I like the xds here. I own the 45 and love it. Also not having a safety is nice but the grip safety is great. It's added safety without having to flip a lever. Only advantage of the Sheild is it may be an oz or 2 lighter. My xds 45 has been flawless however. SA is shipping mags too and I don't think the availability of Sheild mags is good right now. I've been looking for over a year for a Sheild and can't find anything. So xds it was and I turned out happy.
 
I can't compare them. Haven't shot a Shield. The XDs 9mm is, however, a nice and controlable shooter. Not at all snappy like other subcompact 9mm pistols can be.
 
The PPS is ok, but almost $100 separates it from the 'Shield'. I would rather fill cart with some groceries then fork it over for the pistol. I see zero reason to pick XDs 9x19 over the the S&W as the price gap is even larger. Why fork over CART FULL of high quality groceries over to Springfield Armory?
Here, here, well said, and all that.

There will be a few who say the XDS trigger is better, but better how? I've not experienced a superior trigger from the SA camp, not with the big boys or this new pint sized offering. Not to say they're bad, because they're not, but I'm not buying "the trigger is better" by a handful of folks saying it is with no comparison with weight, break, reset.

There is nothing the XDS offers that'd give me reason to fork over even more money. I have bedside guns with a higher capacity and light rail, so the XDS, while a nice offering, doesn't sway me from the Shield. Not at $450. It's thin, carries easy, has aggressive enough of a grip, no ridiculous grip safety (don't like the Shields manual safety...leave it off! Glockers know what I'm saying) and as a purely aesthetically driven statement : I find XDs to be Glock-like in ugliness.

My two cents, that is all.
 
Had the Shield (sold it), and just got the XDS-9mm. I have already sold the XDS as my Kahr is a better gun for me.

I preferred the XDS to the Shield though.
 
We all have different tastes. When I bought my shield over a year ago, I sold my two year old Kahr PM9 with night sights after the first range trip. shield is so much better to me.
 
I have a 9mm and 40S&W Shield. Excellent guns.

The LGS just got in a XDS. I was going to buy it but but I can't see about $130 more than the Shield. I also do not like the unnecessary grip "safety".
 
I have already sold the XDS as my Kahr is a better gun for me.
^^^ I know both the XDs 9 and the Shield are great carry guns, but my Kahr CW9 shoots too good and has been good to me. I also love the Kahr trigger!

I agree. The XDs 9 and Shield don't offer anything for me that the Kahr CM9 doesn't already offer for less money. Unless you have to have that extra round. Of course, the CM9 is smaller, so that is a positive trade-off in my opinion.
 
I had a CW9 for a while but could never get comfortable with the trigger, . . . even though it was quite smooth. Just not a DAO guy. The XDs trigger has a small bit of takeup, but the actual release is crisp and defined.
 
I had a CW9 for a while but could never get comfortable with the trigger, . . . even though it was quite smooth. Just not a DAO guy. The XDs trigger has a small bit of takeup, but the actual release is crisp and defined.

I understand that opinion. For me, though, these are not target pistols, but last-ditch defensive firearms. The Kahr trigger is long (a safety plus for a pistol small enough to fit in a pocket), but it's also smooth, crisp, consistent, and reliable.
 
True, fishbed77. Not target pistols. It would still be of interest to me to do a side by side with my XDs 9mm and the Kahr to see where rounds end up on paper, using the same rate of fire. May have to do that.
 
These are both on my short list... Have not handled or fired either one. (have just recently sold enough bicycles to go shopping!)

Anyway.... "Hickock45" was mightily impressed with the Shield's trigger... He said it was the best of all the pocket 9s.
However, I just watched his wring-out of the XD...and he said the trigger was "improving".... (He was testing the .45 version)

Tough choice... the Shield is attractively priced.

However, I've been carrying a Glock 23 for about 20 years, so the baby Glock is a well-known quantity... Bit bulkier, however.
 
Although the XDs 9 does intrigue me for some unexplainable reason (the entire XD line didn't ever do a thing for me), it nor the Shield have enough going for them to supplant the CW9. I shoot it well, like that it has zero safeties, and it has been 100% reliable. It's less expensive than the other two and I have a tidy sum wrapped up in holsters, mags, etc. I know I am good to go! ;)
 
I love me little XDs in .45. Great carry gun, and fun on the range despite it's size and weight. Ergos, look, and cartridge pushed me into it. No regrets.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top