SAF Wins Restraining Order Against N O Confiscations

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fred Fuller

Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 26, 2004
Messages
21,215
Location
AL, NC
The press release itself is IMHO commentary enough... teamwork, anyone?

lpl/nc
========

http://www.saf.org/viewpr.asp?id=162

NEWS RELEASE
Second Amendment Foundation
12500 NE Tenth Place • Bellevue, WA 98005
(425) 454-7012 • FAX (425) 451-3959 • www.saf.org

FEDERAL JUDGE HALTS NEW ORLEANS GUN SEIZURES

For Immediate Release: 9/23/2005

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana this afternoon issued a temporary restraining order on behalf of the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and National Rifle Association (NRA), bringing an end to firearm seizures from citizens living in and around New Orleans.

District Judge Jay Zainey issued the restraining order against all parties named in a lawsuit filed Thursday by SAF and NRA. Defendants in the lawsuit include New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin and Police Chief Edwin Compass III.

“This is a great victory, not just for the NRA and SAF, but primarily for law-abiding gun owners everywhere,” said SAF founder Alan M. Gottlieb. “We are proud to have joined forces with the NRA to put an end to what has amounted to a warrantless gun grab by authorities in New Orleans and surrounding jurisdictions.

“Over the past three weeks,” he continued, “residents who had lost virtually everything in the devastation following Hurricane Katrina had also essentially been stripped of something even more precious, their civil rights, and their right of self-defense, because of these gun seizures.

“SAF and NRA had no alternative but to take action,” Gottlieb added. “If these gun confiscations had been allowed to continue without challenge, it would have set a dangerous precedent that would have encouraged authorities in other jurisdictions to believe they also could suspend the civil rights of citizens in the event of some other emergency.

“What must happen now, and quickly,” said Gottlieb, “is for authorities in the New Orleans area to explain how they will return all of those firearms to their rightful owners, and do it promptly. What this ruling affirms is that even in the face of great natural disasters, governments cannot arbitrarily deprive citizens of their rights. Thanks to some great teamwork between SAF and the NRA, this sort of thing will hopefully never happen again.”

The Second Amendment Foundation is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 600,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control. SAF has previously funded successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles; New Haven, CT; and San Francisco on behalf of American gun owners, a lawsuit against the cities suing gun makers & an amicus brief & fund for the Emerson case holding the Second Amendment as an individual right.
-END-
 
Anybody else notice that while the SAF press release mentions and co-credits the NRA, the NRA press release doesn't even mention the SAF?

Guess which one gets my contribution?
 
Anybody else notice that while the SAF press release mentions and co-credits the NRA, the NRA press release doesn't even mention the SAF?

Guess which one gets my contribution?


Here we go again. What part of all of this are you missing?

NRA could have left SAF out for any number of reasons, including the fact that maybe their policy is to not make press releases for other organizations.

Do you have any facts to support your argument that somehow NRA has done something "wrong" while SAF has done it all "right"?

Wayne LaPierre made a statement on the radio the other mentioning SAF specifically in the search for victims. The fact that it isn't in a stupid press release has nothing to do with things, and you're truly clueless for suggesting otherwise.

I am to the point where I am going to start considering ANYONE that is anti-NRA, SAF, GOA in any combination or mixture an anti-2A in total.
All groups should be supported fully. Period.

There is no possible way if you read all that has occured here you could come to the conclusion that NRA and SAF don't coexist in a helpful relationship for both organizations and all of us gun owners, and if you do, then you are part of the problem and your money might as well be sent to the VPC.

Why didn't SAF mention GOA in their press release? GOA lawyers were in New Orleans also? It's a conspiracy by SAF to undermine the work of GOA right?

Support ALL pro 2A organizations 100% or you might as well go over to the other side.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top