War Squirrel
Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2009
- Messages
- 211
He can sell it if he so chooses, but if he manufactured it in order to sell it for a profit, then he needs an FFL. At least that's my understanding.
I believe the latter.Is "closed bolt" really a law, or just a good way to avoid potential trouble?
You just have to add a serial number before it leaves your hands.
zxcvbob said:Is "closed bolt" really a law, or just a good way to avoid potential trouble?
I thought that that ruling was specific to the Tec-9?ATF Ruling 82-2 = semi-auto open bolt firearms made after 01-1982 are considered MGs.
Originally Posted by Quiet
ATF Ruling 82-2 = semi-auto open bolt firearms made after 01-1982 are considered MGs.
I thought that that ruling was specific to the Tec-9?
I believe the ATF "recommends" serial number and maker information be inscribed on a home-build should it subsequently be sold. I don't believe it is required, but a suggestion from ATF really ought to be followed. A quick letter to the Technical Branch would be a good idea if you have questions.Could you cite a law or regulation stating that? I don't believe inscribing a serial number is required at all for a personally built title II firearm, even if it is sold or otherwise exchanges hands.
Nope. That's only for NFA-registered weapons, as is the serial number requirement. You don't have to mark a home-made gun at all.you must put a mfg name city state and serial number on all firearms made.
The language used by ATF is rather ambigious on this one. It leaves the door open for the home builder to not mark their rifle, but still allows the ATF to state later, "why didn't you follow our suggestion on marking your rifle".dprice, I was just about to quote that. It is actually on the ATF's FAQ page.
Note the words "suggest" and "should."
The section of the code they point you to referrs to marking NFA-regulated (Title II) firearms, NOT "Title I" guns like semi-auto rifles. The law does not require this -- though they are free to "suggest" that you "should" do whatever they want.
I like your design. If it works, patent it. If you can sell it for under $400, you'll sell a ton of those.
The language used by ATF is rather ambigious on this one. It leaves the door open for the home builder to not mark their rifle, but still allows the ATF to state later, "why didn't you follow our suggestion on marking your rifle".
I believe the ATF "recommends" serial number and maker information be inscribed on a home-build should it subsequently be sold. I don't believe it is required, but a suggestion from ATF really ought to be followed. A quick letter to the Technical Branch would be a good idea if you have questions.