SGL-21 (converted Saiga) first impressions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Z-Michigan

Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
4,047
Location
Michigan
I had the chance to closely examine and play with a friend's SGL-21 Saiga yesterday. For those not familiar, look here:

http://www.k-var.com/shop/product.php?productid=17015&cat=353&page=1

This is basically a Russian made Saiga that gets converted to AK look/configuration by Arsenal (Las Vegas company) before they are sold. The base gun is about the same as sporter Saigas, with a few details.

First off, being familiar with sporter Saigas, I noted the following differences:
-there is no evidence, inside or outside, that the receiver ever had holes for the sporter trigger.
-there is no bolt hold-open lever, nor a hole for it. This was a surprise and disappointment.
-there is a huge muzzle nut underneath the muzzle brake, and appearing to be a separate piece from the barrel itself.
-the rear sight piece is polished gray (possibly zinc phosphated) and graduated to "10" (as in 1000m), vs. the sporter Saiga being a black piece and graduated only to "3."

General impressions:
Basically this is a well-made AK that comes from the authentic Russian AK factory (Izhmash). It is mostly similar to a regular Saiga except as noted above. It has a darker, blacker, glossier paint job than other Saigas, which I suspect is applied by Arsenal. Even the muzzle brake is painted!

Part of the conversion includes US-made furniture and US-made trigger group. I was a bit disappointed in both. The US-made furniture is not TAPCO, but it doesn't seem like any higher quality. I assume it is an accurate copy of the Russian AK-101 furniture, but I don't like it nearly as much as most other furniture I've handled. The lower handguard had a slight bit of movement which I have not felt on other AKs. This would be a great candidate for a set of Ironwood's wood furniture.

The trigger group didn't impress either. It is two stage and the break is fairly crisp, but heavy - like 8 or 10 lbs heavy. Probably closer to 10 lbs. In comparison a TAPCO "G2" group breaks at around 4lbs. Also, the trigger itself is hollow at the rear and fairly heavily curved, while many other AK triggers are not hollowed at the rear and very slightly less curved. The SGL group is somewhat crisper than the TAPCO when it breaks, but so much heavier that I would prefer the G2.

The SGL is 922(r) compliant for any mags. The SGL21-61 that I handled comes with a tiny little 5rd mag, which appears to be a cross between the slabside Saiga mags and a modern military waffle pattern mag. I also tried a TAPCO mag and some steel 30's. The TAPCO polymer mag had serious side to side wobble which wasn't present with other mags; and that same mag did not wobble in another AK that was handy. The steel mags had only slight wobble, well within normal for an AK, and the 5rd waffle mag had almost no wobble.

In other respects this is basically just a Saiga/AK made by Izhmash. They are very well made by AK standards, with a good feel (apart from the US compliance parts). I was expecting it to be far nicer than a home-converted Saiga, but other than having authentic handguards and no added holes in the receiver, I don't think it is. At current prices the SGL-21 is slightly more expensive than a sporter Saiga + conversion parts (other than handguard). I would say you can just about flip a coin between those options if you're in the market for a converted Saiga.
 
I ended up with an early Christmas present - two of my friends bought SGL-21-61s after I pointed them to Atlantic Firearms. Well, one got into serious dutch with his wife when he brought his home, and it looks like I've inherited his SGL for quite a deal. My impressions of both SGLs were a bit different in some areas, similar in others.

The rifles both seem to be very well made overall. The black plastic furniture makes the rifle feel surprisingly light (compared to wood furniture). This is one light rifle. It looks very close to Russian AK-101 furniture at least as far as appearances go. Just wish there wasn't a noticeable "US" on the buttstock. Both buttstock and handguards were a tight fit with no play on either rifle. The buttstock has the trapdoor for the cleaning kit. Personally, I like the look of the black rather than the plum or OD.

Some have complained about the Arsenal finish, but so far I'm on the fence. It seems much nicer than the finish on my AKs. However, first time we moved the selectors, it left a pretty good mark right down to the metal. Not sure how durable the finish will be in other places after seeing that mark "to the bone" with just one slide of the selector. Then again, that's exactly where a big ugly mark should be. ;)

The gas tube and front sight base are both dead center. No cant whatsoever of on either of these.

Got the top cover off of one SGL, but we gave up for the time being on the second. Nice and tight is and understatement. I'm happy with the receiver and internals (the one I saw). I do wish Izhmash would leave on more of the cyrillic marking. "S" and "F" just don't seem right on a Russian rifle.

I tried out Bulgarian polymer mags (got a few from Apex for cheep,non-waffle) and some metal mags. Both fit well - metal fit tight as a drum, and the polymers had very little wobble in any direction.

The trigger group might need a bit of minor work as it feels somewhat gritty, but I would say that trigger pull on mine is between 6 and 8 lbs out of the box. I wonder if they used different trigger parts in different batches of rifles.

I have the 25 meter test target that came with the rifle,that showed a group well under a half inch.

Depending on how high the prices bounce back up, I still think these are a good buy.
 
Last edited:
The bottom handguard on mine does not wobble, and Bulgarian waffle mags fit tight.

As far as the trigger, I agree it is definitely heavier than a G2, but breaks at a light weight than, say, a standard AR trigger. I think it is fine for the kind of rifle than an AK is... when I first pulled a G2, my impression was actually that it was a pretty nice trigger, almost to the point of being out of place on an AK.

I was also wondering about the apparant lack of forward holes for the original trigger.

At 599, personally I would still by one of these over doing a home conversion.
 
Looks like they're now back up to $699 at k-var and $679 at Atlantic Firearms...
 
my sgl-31 has a canted front sight and groups 3-4 inches at 100yds. WHOOPPEEE!! I really like the looks and how it handles/runs but I'd prolly trade this sucker for an old SAM7A1R in a heartbeat.
 
I bought a SGL-21.............errrrr......:rolleyes:.........Three SGL-21s when they were $499 each. Another difference not mentioned here is the Politically Correct Saiga has a chamber that deforms the shell casing when fired. The SGLs don't have this. Oh........The muzzle break works well. I thought I was shooting a 5.56 X 45 AK when I first pulled the trigger.
AK103a.gif
 
Another difference not mentioned here is the Politically Correct Saiga has a chamber that deforms the shell casing when fired.

True about regular Saigas, and I didn't know that the SGL lacked this. FWIW my understanding is that the chamber design is required by Russian law for guns that might be sold on their civilian market, and is not a US law or BATFE requirement.
 
I just got an SGL21 and love it BUT my rear site is canted, Ive heard of others having canted front sites, I cant tell if the front is off on mine but you can definitely tell the rear is off.
 
That's really odd. Canted front sights are not rare, but canted rear sights are rare. Are you certain you're looking at it perfectly upright? In any event, I would send it back if the sight is canted. Too much $$ for that level of quality.
 
How hard is it to get the carbon buildup out of that brake?

I've got the same brake. Some carbon collects on theh muzzle and the inside walls of the brake. The gas slits and flanges seem to stay pretty clear of carbon.

Here's what the insides of my used 5.56 example look like. The interior is hardchromed and you can see the zig-zag gas slits. BSW

IMG_1208.jpg
 
That's really odd. Canted front sights are not rare, but canted rear sights are rare. Are you certain you're looking at it perfectly upright? In any event, I would send it back if the sight is canted. Too much $$ for that level of quality.
yeah mine is the 66 with rails and you can tell by looking from the top that its out of line with the rail, and you can see the angle when aiming also. They're suppose to call me today about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top