Nightcrawler
Member
I'm watching the 1989 James Bond flick, License to Kill, on TBS as I type this. The movie stars Timothy Dalton (whom I've read best represents James Bond as he was orignally intended to be). It's just started, but something suprised me in the opening sequence.
Bond (and some DEA agents) were running around with guns....and they didn't have their fingers on the trigger. Bond was carrying a Beretta 92, a popular choice in 80s action flicks, though it seems a little un-Bond-like to carry such a big pistol (Walther P5 compact would've been a better choice, in my opinion).
It's weird to see halfway decent gun handling in James Bond movie. Especially the latest ones, that are as over the top and corny as the ones from the 70s, in my opinion.
Imagine a well-made, big budget James Bond movie. But, with a move believable plot, good gun handling, realistic gun fights, and a believable villian. You could still have the gadgets, the cars, and the babes, without having funny-looking supervillians trying to conquer the world, henchmen in pastel jumpsuits, and shooting from the hip...
Bond (and some DEA agents) were running around with guns....and they didn't have their fingers on the trigger. Bond was carrying a Beretta 92, a popular choice in 80s action flicks, though it seems a little un-Bond-like to carry such a big pistol (Walther P5 compact would've been a better choice, in my opinion).
It's weird to see halfway decent gun handling in James Bond movie. Especially the latest ones, that are as over the top and corny as the ones from the 70s, in my opinion.
Imagine a well-made, big budget James Bond movie. But, with a move believable plot, good gun handling, realistic gun fights, and a believable villian. You could still have the gadgets, the cars, and the babes, without having funny-looking supervillians trying to conquer the world, henchmen in pastel jumpsuits, and shooting from the hip...