Sigs are better than Glocks !

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quoting ckone: "That's 'cause most Sig owners rarely shoot! Sig owners are so busy picking out fancy grips and saving for expensive "upgrades" to bring their pistols up to a normal standard (SRT, etc.) that they never really go shooting... If they did they'd know I'm not jokeing when I point out that their overpriced guns are heavy, thick, have too many levers in the way of a proper shooting grip, have the slide release in the worst spot ever and tend to choke next to ugly plastic guns at matches..."

Ah, match shooting. Why is a match shooting grip the only "proper" grip? That "proper" grip might not fare so well in a force-on-force training session, or a contact-distance street fight. A SIG's controls are placed just fine for a fighting grip, especially for the double-action pull. I can understand a high-thumb position for lighter single-action and "safe-action" pulls, when on a peaceful shooting range.

Even in "for score" shooting mode, with a SIG, if I choose to not lock my thumb down, my horizontal thumb is below the level of the slide stop lever, and does not touch the decocker. This assumes right-hand mode, anyway. I often favor shooting as a lefty, especially with a DA/SA SIG, in which case the controls, and that decocker hump in the left grip panel, are out of the way, regardless of thumb position. Not that the SIG is forcing me to shoot lefty; I often prefer to shoot 1911s lefty, too, and use that same horizontal thumb position, which is LOWER than the safety lever.

I am not taking sides in the Glock-versus-SIG conflict. P229 and P226 SIGs fit me well. SIG P220s and P245s point too low for me. Glocks don't fit me, but that is not the fault of the gun itself. I also prefer the SIG DAK trigger over the Glock "safe-action," but that is not the fault of the Glock.

I used Glocks for a while, two of them being G22 models I bought for duty use. One gave me some drama, the other ran well, except for one embarrassing malf during a shooting class. My P229s have been boringly reliable. They are also quite stock, except for TJ's Custom triggers I installed, to facilitate the DA pulls, in which I like my finger to roll across a narrower trigger face. Factory grip panels. Factory springs.

Edited to add: FWIW, I wear a big-city PD badge, and have to buy my duty firearms. The P226 and P229 are the two most expensive weapons on the list of approved DA .40 autopistols, while the Glock G22 and G23 are much less expensive.
 
Last edited:
I think the problems stems from one problem. Nobody owns Sigs.

Seriously though, there are a ton more Glocks out there. Both are decent guns. I prefer Glocks. I just shoot them well and I like them and they work.

That said, I've converted a few Sig fans over the years...
 
I haven't been a member for two+ years, and I don't own a Sig, but...I have shot side by side me with my M&P .40, and my brother with his Block 27 .40. The results shooting umc factory round nose ammo: He spent alot of time fixing his stove pipes, while I just dropped a clip, and kept on firing. The block just don't fit my hand at all, but that is only 1 model, I haven't ever been a fan of those. What I am a fan of is my Kimber Ultra CDPII. That my friends IS a gun...
 
Josh,
Denpending on his MOS, he may never have touched a handgun in the service. I only touched the M9 to clear it for my lazy CSM who felt clearing her own weapon was below her. I spent 8 years in. I deployed 1 time. I wouldn't have been in a position to touch another M9 for the next 3 years guaranteed.
 
I know there are thousands of Glocks that are flawless.
But i've never read any posts of Sigs having problems.
A.A.M.O.F. i may be buying the Glock 21 SF in the near future.
They are cheaper than Sigs !
Uh-huh...I read on the internets Jesus himself prefers Glocks.

Since this thread is a joke and me previous post was a joke, let's keep it going.
 
Well.... I think some folks said that the Glocks get shot more than the Sigs. I guess one could attribute that to the Glock owners continually wondering if thier weapons would work, and they were having to check more often....

Whereas the Sig owners knew that thier weapons would perform and don't have to continually shoot them to make sure.....

Just thought I would throw that out there.

I might shoot today if it will warm up a few more degrees, might even shoot one of my Sigs, seeings how I haven't shot them this year.
 
I love the limp wrist explanations... do they make a model with pink furry grips for the shemales?
 
I've never had a floorplate fly off my Glock during a reload, dumping the spring, follower, and all my rounds on the ground........I have had that happen with a SIG.

I've never broken the extractor on a Glock, I have on a SIG.

I've never had light primer strikes with a Glock after a long range sessions because the gun didn't want to return to battery dirty. I have on a SIG.

I've never had to send a Glock back to the factory because the firing pin that came with the gun was too long, and was piercing primers. I have with a SIG.

In fact, I've never had to send a Glock back to the factory period.

If all I'm doing is going to a range to shoot for as tight a group as I can get, and neither speed nor reliability are a concern. I pick up the SIG. For everything else, it used to be the Glock (until I got my hands on an M&P).
 
OP

So it happens, I have several of each. Send me a couple of hundred thousand Fed or UMC ball rounds and I will conduct an exhaustive test and let you know the results of my scientific evaluation.

If you hurry with ammo, I should have the test protocols promulgated soon.
We could wrap this up in two or three years, if I can find volunteers to load mags. Send me some mags too.

(or, this thread reduced to plain fact, you are wasting bandwidth with stupid assertions that you can't back up. By the way, what's the MTBF for a Sig 226?)
 
Oh, Reaper;

When the junior Special Forces group at Ft. Bragg wore out their Berettas, they DID NOT buy any Sigs.

Wonder why the FBI ditched their Sigs? What did they buy for replacements?

Again, this vs. that is a stupid argument.
 
I had 2 Glock 21 and 1 G19, HK P30, USP Expert .40, Tactical .45, XD .45, sold them all. Now all my pistols are Sig ( P229 9mm DAK, P226 .40, SP2022 .40, P226 X-Five Short & Smart), they are just amazing!:)
 
Glocks are more sensitive to limp wristing than other pistols. My young Son could get my G19 to stovepipe pretty regularly, shooting my weak reloads. Plastic frames, heavy recoil springs, under powered reloads, ammount to stovepipe failures. On the other hand, my under sprung, all steel, CZ75, could shoot those same reloads with 100% reliability.
 
There is an easy fix for you. When you load light rounds, match it with a lighter spring. The factory springs are tuned for full-power loads. That goes for just about any gun.
 
Dry Humor

Your name fits you perfectly:D Glocks probably get shot more often because their impoverished owners can afford to buy more ammo with the money they saved not buying a Sig.:evil: Listen, both are good guns as are several other brands like the Springfield XD, CZ, S&W M&P, HK etc. I know lots of people who own Glocks and very few who own Sigs. I also know that at one point, Glock had captured more than %40 of the LEO Market while brands like S&W, Springfield, HK and SIG divied up the the rest of the market. That means there were roughly 3 Glocks out there to any other single brand. Actually if they all had an equal share of the remaining market it would figure at 2 and 2/3rds to one assuming there were only four competitors for the remaining 60%. The reason that that is relevant is easy, the more guns a company produces the more problems they will have. It is simply a matter of percentages. If the civilian market is reflective of the Law enforcement market, as it often, then it is reasonable to assume that many more people own Glocks than own Sigs. So, it also stands to reason that you will read of more cases of failures/problems with the Glock than the Sig.

Does that mean that Glocks are better than Sigs, not in my opinion. What it definitely does mean is that Glocks are good guns, though they may not be for everyone. Some Law enforcement agencies are now getting away from the Glock and going to guns like the XD more for liability/safety reasons than reliability issues I suspect. Does it mean that Sigs are better than Glocks, no. Are we gonna resolve this issue here? Just as soon you you admit that your Chevy is infereior to my Ford.:evil:

I recently posted a thread titled "which semi-auto would you bet your life on out of the box". It was basically meant to find out which gun people had the most faith in that it would run reliably with the least amount of problems right from the factory. While it was not scientific to be sure, I think the results were obvious and of some value. Glock had the top spot by a ratio of over two to one over the second place XD with all other brands waaaay behind. Does this neccessarily mean that Glock is better than Sig? No, but it does mean that Glock is more popular than Sig. Guns, or any machine for that matter, do not retain their popularity, especially if it is as UGLY as Glock unless they are a good reliable product. That is exactly what Glock is, a good reliable product and whether or not your Sig is better than my Glock really doesn't matter to me at all.:p
 
Some Law enforcement agencies are now getting away from the Glock and going to guns like the XD more for liability/safety reasons than reliability issues I suspect.
O'rly?
I also know that at one point, Glock had captured more than %40 of the LEO Market
60%
 
I would not shy away from another Sig at some point. I now own four glocks of which 3 are 9's and a .45. Glocks do not cost as much as Sigs. If I had to spend what a sig costs to get a good gun I would. Glocks are "cheap," simple, and reliable. Sigs are expensive, fairly simple, and reliable. I think cost is a big determining factor here.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top