Smith 617 22LR 4 or 6 inch barrel

Status
Not open for further replies.

razorback2003

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
1,231
I have been thinking about picking up a Smith 617 for target shooting at the range. I will not be carrying the handgun. Would you go for the 4 or the 6 inch barrel? Also does S&W do action and trigger jobs on these guns?
 
I have an older blued 17 with 6 inch barrel. Very accurate out of the box and did not need any trigger or action work. For accuracy I'd do the 6" again, but a 4" for carry. Actually there is probably no difference in the inherent accuracy of the two barrel lengths. The 6" just gives more sight radius and is easier for me to shoot well than my shorter barreled .22s.
 
The 6" barrel will have a longer sight radius, but some find them muzzle heavy and harder to hold steady, so there's no telling which you'd be more accurate with until you try them both. I happen to be no more accurate with my 6" K-22 than with my 4" 617. If you can't test fire each, try to at least examine and hold each to see if the 6" feels relatively muzzle heavy to you.

If you're going to shoot it in single action, there's likely little need for 'smithing, as S&Ws typically have excellent single action triggers.

But it's a rare factory gun who's double action trigger can't be improved by a good revolver 'smith, though. You can have S&W tune it, but from what I've seen, you're more likely to get a better action job from a good revolver 'smith. My recommendation would be to shoot it for a bit while doing more research on this before spending your money on an action job.

Keep in mind that rimfires can't be tuned as lightly as their centerfire counterparts without getting into reliability issues. Fortunately, "smooth" is much more important that "light".
 
6" barrel for target shooting-the longer barrel is not intrinsically more accurate but many, if not most, people can shoot a longer barrel more accurately due to the increased sight radius and, for some, the better "balance".
 
I have a 17-4 that an earlier owner installed a 6 inch "bull" barrel and a Bo-Mar rib and sights. Muzzle heavy and harder to hold steady does not begin to describe it. From a rest it is wonderful but I shoot my Ruger SP101-22 with a 4.2" barrel better most days.
 
I'd get the Model 63 for carry, and the 6" 617 for the range, but I don't have too much of a problem holding a big revolver steady.
 
I have a K-22 (pre model 17) 6", and a 617 4" 10 shot. For my particular purposes (indoor range plinking) these isn't much practical accuracy difference.
 
For me the 4 inch barrel balances better, and is all around a more versatile pistol.
 
For more serious target work, you want to get more weight towards the muzzle. The greater mass makes the gun more "forgiving" in that since it is heavier, it takes more energy to move it off target. The weight dampens the movement. That is why the best target pistols (and rifles) have built in methods for attaching or adding muzzle weight. My 22 that I shoot target with is a Dan Wesson and I use the 8" heavy barrel for that. Along with the added weight, you get more sight radius. If you can try both a heavy and light muzzle revolver side by side, you will see the difference. Good luck.

DW22A-1_zps4c4dc232.jpg
 
I would suggest that you handle both and see what feels best to you. I have both the 6" & 4" 617s. I find the 6" to be muzzle heavy and uncomfortable to shoot for long periods. The 4" is a tack driver in my hands and a pure joy to handle.
Dave
 
I have a 6" 617 and a 6" 17-6 and they are my favorite shooters and way more accurate than I am!
 
I got the 4" because most of my DA revolvers are 4"and that's what I like. What do you like? That's kinda what matters isn't it?
 
I ended up with a 4" 617 (10 shot) to complement my 4" 66-2 with .500 target hammer and trigger. They are a perfect pair!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2616.jpg
    IMG_2616.jpg
    113 KB · Views: 24
Although not one of the choices given, my most accurate is an 8 3/8" six shot (pre lock) model 617.

I am in the camp of "more barrel is better".

100_0804.jpg

My kids are always amazed with what I can do with this gun (they think it's all skill) but I know the truth (it's 99% gun).

Small cottontail taken at 60 long steps.
FE6B989F-C5A5-4EF2-8E1E-B3363EBD63C2_zpsocra00xz.jpg
 
Last edited:
Since this will be a range toy, definitely go with the 6" one. I have a 10-round model 617 with a 6" barrel and love it. I did opt for a holster (Galco DAO) and bought a pair of speed loaders and a loading block that holds 80 rounds so that the 10-round speed loaders can pick them up. Nifty range package. The revolver really shoots well out to 50 yards.
 
I went with 4" after handling both at gunshow. Both, felt well. But, 6' is to much muzzle weight for my mid size hands. By the way it shot great, triger is aceptable from factory.
The only regret not buying it before.

czhen
FL
 
I'd go with the 6" barrel. I bought an #17 about 4 months ago, 6", most amazing revolver I own! This revolver was made in '51 if that matters, a truly amazing bluing job also.
 
I have had a 6" 617 for about 15 years. The gun is muzzle heavy to the point of being 'clunky'.

If the longer sight plane makes for better accuracy, I haven't seen it. My Ruger Single Six will out shoot it at the range.

If I buy another 617, it'll have a 4" barrel.
 
I have an early 2000's 6 inch 6 shot 617. It's my favorite gun. Best trigger in my entire collection too. Sure, it's a lot of gun for being a .22 but I wouldn't trade it for anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top