• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Snubnose War

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
1,926
Location
The Yellow Rose of Texas
I ( being an idiot) traded my talo edition sp101 snub nose. So Im officially in the market for a ccw revolver. I have two choices a colt agent fairly used for 500 or smith and wesson model 64 2 inch barrel for 400. the 64 has only been fired 25 times since the 80s. dont have a pic of it but ive inspected it already,have not seen the agent.So help me choose , colt namesake though decently used, or smith smoothness almost new?
 

Attachments

  • ATT_1371606171489_image.jpeg
    ATT_1371606171489_image.jpeg
    55.5 KB · Views: 163
  • photo.JPG
    photo.JPG
    54.9 KB · Views: 167
S&W.

You won't be sorry you did.

That Colt looks rode hard and put away wet.
I think I see a lot of rust on the barrel, etc.

Even the trigger guard looks bent in the left side photo.

rc
 
I'm with RC. If both were in similar condition, the D-frame colt would be nice as it could be pocket carried, but both are a bit big for that.
 
S&W would be my pick..... hands down!

I absolutely do not knock a Colt, but the one thing that never pleased me on a Colt Revolver was the cylinder release....
 
I ( being an idiot) traded my talo edition sp101 snub nose. So Im officially in the market for a ccw revolver. I have two choices a colt agent fairly used for 500 or smith and wesson model 64 2 inch barrel for 400. the 64 has only been fired 25 times since the 80s. dont have a pic of it but ive inspected it already,have not seen the agent.So help me choose , colt namesake though decently used, or smith smoothness almost new?
I would pass on both. While surprisingly difficult to find on second-hand market four hundred is going price for 2" RB S&W Model 12 in very good condition. That gun is "head and shoulders" above what you shown in the pics.
 
I would pass on both. That gun is "head and shoulders" above what you shown in the pics.
Mmmmm?

What was shown in the pics is the $500 Colt from both sides.

He said the $400 S&W had only been fired 25 times since new.
But he didn't post pictures of it.

rc
 
Looking at the Colt from the left side: Might be a crack in the topstrap above the cylinder/barrel gap. It also appears to be Parkerized, which was only done after the company fired it's experienced polishers so they could replace them with lower paid new hires. Not a smart move.

The Old Fuff would say, "thanks, but no thanks."

I am also not a fan of the S&W 64, as I consider it to be too large and unbalanced for the intended purpose. However if you like them big and heavy... :cool:
 
I would take the Smith. It could take a few +P loads here and there and Smith had stronger actions. An excellent in or on the waist band gun.
 
Last edited:
I say neither and look for a steel framed DS (just love 'em, more indeed than the alloy Cobra and Agent)!

Just sayin'. Vintage Smith Chiefs Special is OK for me too, but you are giving up a round. How 'bout a 2" mod 10? (A dick special is still better IMHO).
 
I'd rather have a comparable condition Colt or a fixed sight K frame Smith, than a 64.
I don't like adjustable sight revolvers for CC. For something in the size range of a D frame Colt to a K frame Smith, I like to carry IWB.
Those adjustable sights don't feel good, rubbing against my hide.

Then again, I like my CC snubs to chamber calibers starting with 4 and ending with 4 or 5.
For me, the Charter Bulldog .44 Spl wins.
 
Go with the Model 64. I had one of those "cost cutting" Colt Agents and it was one of the most poorly assembled and finished revolvers I have ever come across.
 
While I'm not particularly a fan of the Agent, I'll take a Colt over a Smith anytime. Most days I have a Detective Special in my pocket.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top