So after 57 years I finally detail cleaned my rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eugen

Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2016
Messages
414
Location
Indiana
Yes, I finally detail stripped and cleaned my Remington Nylon 66 22LR. Its not quite as bad as the title reads, as I have always cleaned the bore and chamber, and attempted to place some oil where it could be useful. This rifle was never disassembled until now. Moreover, this rifle has seldom been fired since the early 70’s. Only since I retired four years ago have I dug it out to shoot it some. The rifle has been super reliable and only recently did a I have a few FTfeed issues (that maybe have been cheap ammo related).

When my dad bought it for me 57 years ago (this month) for my birthday, he sternly advised me to not disassemble the rifle as it was a new, high tech design that did not require the normal lubrication. So I listened. Decades later I was lectured from guys more knowledgeable about firearms than me that the Nylon 66 was very difficult to disassemble and warned me not to detail strip and clean it. So I listened. o_O

Please understand that I am the type of owner that takes loving care of all my, mostly vintage firearms. When I get a new firearm. It gets studied, detail stripped, cleaned, inspected and lubed. I gently clean and lube every firearm after a range trip, without exception. So I am not the sort of owner that abuses his firearms. Having some time on my hands during this covid-19 isolation, I decided it was time to see what was inside the Nylon 66 and found a few nice instructional videos on taking this rifle down. The videos helped immensely. Actually they made it easy peasy.

As expected, I found dried, hard grease and plenty of spent powder gunk inside. I also discovered that this rifle is mostly plastic or nylon and of a fairly unique design. After a through cleaning and careful lube I got it back together and took it to the range. It cycled smooth as silk with 100% perfect function. What a great day this this dear old friend.

Attached is an adv that appeared in Guns and hunting July 1961. I am not sure about their accuracy claim, but darn there "greaseless bearing" claim is spot on. :thumbup:


Rem Nylon 66 Adv.jpg
 
Attached is an adv that appeared in Guns and hunting July 1961. I am not sure about their accuracy claim, but darn there "greaseless bearing" claim is spot on. :thumbup:


View attachment 978925
Half a doggone century and change. High praise for those guns, I'd say.

You oughta put that ad in the *every day this year....* gun ad thread.

Todd.
 
A 22lr for $54?

You know, you ̶o̶l̶d̶ ̶f̶a̶r̶t̶s̶ esteemed mature gentleman missed out on a lot of cool technology, but just know a lot of us younger guys really envy how different things were back then. You were born in the right era my man.
 
A family friend gave me a nylon 66 as my first rifle back in the late 90s. I beat that thing up and wore it out pretty bad, eventually part started failing and it got trashed. Still have fond memories of it though.
 
I have more than a few firearms thathave never had anything down the bore except bullets. I do try and not let them get grungy or without lubricant though.
 
After I inherited my dad's P-08 Luger I cleaned it thoroughly. When I removed the firing pin I estimated that it had never seen daylight for at least 60 years. I know my dad never took it apart that far. Not sure what the previous owner(s) did. But my dad acquired the gun in college in the mid 50's.
 
in 1961 my dad worked for an agricultural chemicals place and $54 was about what he took home a week. Fortunatly that was the year Mom started teaching and life money wise got better.

Folks forget that when they see the old gun adds.

About 1964 I did hard outdoor agricultural labor as a kid for fifty hours a week and if we lost no rain time got a whopping FIFTEEN dollar check.

About '67 we convinced a bud to throw his 66 in a pond to see if it floated since it was so light...it did not. It did, after a few moments of draining, continue to shoot.

It took us forever to find a screw driver thin enough to adjust windage with. Scopes started arguments. Some said they did not help because they just pinched on to that dust cover that held everything in the receiver and squirmed about while others maintained they did get better accuracy.

I am curious to know if the barrels can be tuned by adjudting the amount of torque on the screw that tightens the barrel clamp, but am too lazy to do it myself. The 10/22 shooters tend to get religious about adjusting the action screw on 10/22s with an inch pound torque driver.

I think the Nylon 66 is about perfect for what it is, a weighs darned little plinkamatic for just woods walking fun.... which most folks don't see much of anymore.

-kBob
 
Eugen,

Thanks for posting this and opening 66 world again.

So when I see your name should I thing "You-Gene" or "Oy-Jinn" I was in Germany months before I figured out "Prinz OY-Jinn" was "Prince Eugen" as an old man at the club was proud of having once served on her.

-kBob
 
I'm diggin' the ad but doggone it Mister, if you're not gonna show us yours, I'll show you mine!

May 1971 with a Glenfield 4 power.

Always hated not having sling-swivels. I tried some of my home-made twin-loop slings but they slid around on the plastic stock too much and fall/winter branches would make one HELL of a racket against the stock in Minnesota.

Seems like I shot the front sight off of it a couple times. And I TOO was repeatedly warned to not fully disassemble it until "I understood everything I knew" about it.

4yoj7k.jpg

Todd.
 
I would be interested in what parts failed.
The one i remember clearly was the safety lever falling out....semi with no safety was a great way to learn basic gun handling. And the magazine tube got squished a bit.
I also dont remember the 66 shooting very well towards the end, and im pretty sure i asked my dad to look at it since id exhausted my huge knowledge of firearm repair at that point....i could take it apart and put it back together.......
It got trashed and dad bought a m60 to replace it....it could also be dad just didnt want to mess with the 66 anymore.
 
Junky little rifles.

At least that’s what some called them during the day. History has shown otherwise, and they are one of my favorites. The value on the Nylon rifles has skyrocketed in recent years and I do my best to avoid noticing. I enjoy shooting these “too valuable to use” guns too much.
 
Way back before the interweb, when we needed our guns to protect us from dinosaurs in the street, there exisited these thing called books where the printed word was stored and organized on paper.

The Gun Digest Book of Firearms Assembly/Disassembly haunted many of our bookselves in one or more of its volumes. I believe Volume III was devoted to .22 rifles and it featured several pages of excellent Black and White photos to accompany written instructions for tearing down your Nylon 66.If you were smart enough and could get over being a guy long enough to read the instructions through a time or three before you started you could take apart your Nylon 66 AND put it back together so it worked.

I had a bud in my youth that carted about a Winchester 1890 trombone that called the Nylon the "Six-Sixty-Six" because he clamed a gun with that much plastic was unnatural.

I think he may have had a stoke during the original Glock craze.....

-kBob
 
The one i remember clearly was the safety lever falling out....semi with no safety was a great way to learn basic gun handling. And the magazine tube got squished a bit.
I also dont remember the 66 shooting very well towards the end, and im pretty sure i asked my dad to look at it since id exhausted my huge knowledge of firearm repair at that point....i could take it apart and put it back together.......
It got trashed and dad bought a m60 to replace it....it could also be dad just didnt want to mess with the 66 anymore.
My Dad told me that my 66 was worn out and I believed my Dad so I sold it. There was nothing wrong with it even though I had shot it thousands and thousands of times with no cleaning whatsoever. Back then I shot the snot out of it as I had lots of spare time and I didn't have to drive to the range to shoot either. Those day's are long gone.
 
I'm diggin' the ad but doggone it Mister, if you're not gonna show us yours, I'll show you mine!

May 1971 with a Glenfield 4 power.

Always hated not having sling-swivels. I tried some of my home-made twin-loop slings but they slid around on the plastic stock too much and fall/winter branches would make one HELL of a racket against the stock in Minnesota.

Seems like I shot the front sight off of it a couple times. And I TOO was repeatedly warned to not fully disassemble it until "I understood everything I knew" about it.

View attachment 979101

Todd.


Nice Model 66 and scope, Todd! :thumbup:
You convinced me to share a pic of mine.I added a Vortex Diamondback 3-9 x 40 about five years ago. Included is a pic of my 1921 Haenel-Schmeisser 6.35mm (next to some 10mm brass) ;)
Rem Nylon 66 .jpg
 
in 1961 my dad worked for an agricultural chemicals place and $54 was about what he took home a week. Fortunatly that was the year Mom started teaching and life money wise got better.

Folks forget that when they see the old gun adds.

About 1964 I did hard outdoor agricultural labor as a kid for fifty hours a week and if we lost no rain time got a whopping FIFTEEN dollar check.

About '67 we convinced a bud to throw his 66 in a pond to see if it floated since it was so light...it did not. It did, after a few moments of draining, continue to shoot.

It took us forever to find a screw driver thin enough to adjust windage with. Scopes started arguments. Some said they did not help because they just pinched on to that dust cover that held everything in the receiver and squirmed about while others maintained they did get better accuracy.

I am curious to know if the barrels can be tuned by adjudting the amount of torque on the screw that tightens the barrel clamp, but am too lazy to do it myself. The 10/22 shooters tend to get religious about adjusting the action screw on 10/22s with an inch pound torque driver.

I think the Nylon 66 is about perfect for what it is, a weighs darned little plinkamatic for just woods walking fun.... which most folks don't see much of anymore.

-kBob
I scoped my nylon 40 years ago and took it back because I thought the scope was defective as it kept shifting poi. The owner of the gun shop put my 66 on his boresighter and even the slightest pressure on the forearm would move the crosshairs. Since the barrel and receiver are not rigid the 66 really doesn't benefit from a scope unless one needs one to see. I guess it would be fine for up close, but at distance it's all over the place. I'm wondering now if the barrel could be shimmed to take out most of the movement? That would be nice for my aging eyes.
 
This is as far as I have ever stripped my Nylon 66 for my typical five year cleaning.
The gun was a $50 pawn shop orphan with shattered stock and missing extractor and extractor spring (which a local gunsmith had for $12).
After gluing the stock back together and sanding the JB Weld glue off, I just decided to camo the stock. The ugly duckling goes to the mountain more often than the nicer .22s.

I have seen seen YouTube videos on stripping the stock down to bare Nylon 66 polymer, but you dont have to do that for routine cleaning.
index.php


That is the extent I take mine down for cleaning. I leave the striker cocked and the safety on because (a) fouling does not go back that far and (b) getting the striker back on and the sear depressed takes three hands.

With all semi-auto .22s, check for lead or copper shavings smashed on the bolt face and flat of the breech end of the barrel. Obstruction there can dampen the impact of the firing pin on the rimfire primer.
index.php
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top