insidious_calm
Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2004
- Messages
- 337
It seems to me that the relevant questions are as follows:
1) Did the anonymous caller simply report "a man with a gun", or was a specific crime alleged?
2) Was the dispatcher or shift supervisor able to discern a specific crime had been committed based upon the imformation provided by the anonymous caller?
3) Did the officer PERSONALLY observe or know from first hand knowledge reasonable articulable facts that a crime had been, is being, or is about to be committed?
Unless the answer to one of these questions is yes, the responding officer(s) did not even have the legal authority to initiate the stop. His conduct after that is a seperate issue. Personally I feel the officer over reacted. Being cautious is one thing. Approaching the vehicle with your hand on your weapon is one thing. The stated conduct goes well beyond "officer safety" imho. In fact it would amount to a crime here if the premise for the stop was unlawful as qualified immunity does not apply if the officer could have been reasonably expected to know that the stop was unlawful.
It seems to me that without further knowledge the appropriate course of action is to get a copy of the 911 call and transcript, via discovery if necessary, and determine exactly what the dispatcher was told. That way the detainee could determine whether in fact the stop itself was even lawful. Personally I'd demand at least an apology for the officers conduct during the stop. If the stop was in fact unlawful, well, in that event the detainee should seek the appropriate legal remedies and the officer(s) should be punished.
I.C.
P.S. This is NOT cop bashing. Personally I'm a little sick of the "non-leo" bashing I've seen lately. ALL types of bashing need to stop.
1) Did the anonymous caller simply report "a man with a gun", or was a specific crime alleged?
2) Was the dispatcher or shift supervisor able to discern a specific crime had been committed based upon the imformation provided by the anonymous caller?
3) Did the officer PERSONALLY observe or know from first hand knowledge reasonable articulable facts that a crime had been, is being, or is about to be committed?
Unless the answer to one of these questions is yes, the responding officer(s) did not even have the legal authority to initiate the stop. His conduct after that is a seperate issue. Personally I feel the officer over reacted. Being cautious is one thing. Approaching the vehicle with your hand on your weapon is one thing. The stated conduct goes well beyond "officer safety" imho. In fact it would amount to a crime here if the premise for the stop was unlawful as qualified immunity does not apply if the officer could have been reasonably expected to know that the stop was unlawful.
It seems to me that without further knowledge the appropriate course of action is to get a copy of the 911 call and transcript, via discovery if necessary, and determine exactly what the dispatcher was told. That way the detainee could determine whether in fact the stop itself was even lawful. Personally I'd demand at least an apology for the officers conduct during the stop. If the stop was in fact unlawful, well, in that event the detainee should seek the appropriate legal remedies and the officer(s) should be punished.
I.C.
P.S. This is NOT cop bashing. Personally I'm a little sick of the "non-leo" bashing I've seen lately. ALL types of bashing need to stop.