wally
Member
My guess is that pump rifles went the way of bolt action shotguns when the idea that your rifle and shotgun should share the same action type went out of style.
I have a model 14 A in 30 Remington I use for deer and hogs. I use it still hunting in fairly thick cover so long range is of no consequence to me. It came equipped with a Redfield peep sight. The hogs and deer don't seem to know it is not as accurate or the 30-30 is too old and ineffective for big game. If I could find a model 760 in 35 rem I would snatch it up in a heart beat.
I would take either caliber. Both great classic deer, bear, and hog calibersDon't overlook a 760 in .300 Savage. I think it is about perfect for shorter range hunting with 150 soft points. The round fits the action a little better than .308, and recoil is mild. I love mine! .35 Rem is no slouch in this rifle either, but a bit harder and $$$ to find.
For whatever reason (probably just being a product of my time), I've never warmed up to: (a) pump action rifles; or (b) bolt action shotguns.
Never understood the need, nor desire for pump action centerfire rifle firearms.
Now rimfire or even some handgun centerfire makes sense.
Not anywhere in my mind do I see the need to pump multiple rounds of 270, 308, 30-06, etc. at a target needing that kind of energy. Not to mention with practice the difference in time it takes to chamber a cartridge between the two types is negligible, and extraction is better with a bolt action with the leverage it affords.
To me pump action centerfire rifles desirability won't survive at any rate close to that of lever action rifles, in my opinion their desirability will fade with the generation that grew up using them. But I could be all wet with that statement.
Obviously you have never hunted in heavy cover with fast moving driven deer! Fast repeatability and adequate power are a real plus under such conditions........buckshot?......mayhaps, but it is a poor stopper in my experience...it'll kill, but you may never recover your game. Any decently powered deer level cartridge is but to your advantage......lever/semi auto or pump. Under those hunting circumstances one is snap shooting and precision in terms of sight picture is fleeting, at best.
I know European-style driven hunts are rare in the US but see my earlier post about its advantages in them. And mine is a .35Whelen carbine that packs more wallop than any of the calibers you mentioned; I've thought about rebarreling it to an even more powerful 9.3x62 for the next trip to Africa. I've shot a 18pt moose with it too, one shot sufficed nicely then but had it not, I had already racked a second round in chamber before it even had a chance to move.Not anywhere in my mind do I see the need to pump multiple rounds of 270, 308, 30-06, etc. at a target needing that kind of energy.
Of course converting an AR to pump wouldn’t really be all that difficult. Just replace the gas tube with a rod and attach it to a sleeve wrapped around the hand guard.
They are pretty popular here in PA. Most hunting in this area is less then 100yd. A 3006 hits much harder then a 30-30. Accuracy isnt a very big issue @ that distance. Pump slug guns w sabots have largely displaced them. If you can put 3 shots in a pie plate @ 50yd, you will have no difficulty hunting deer here.While the overwhelming majority of my rifles are fairly modern, think post WW2, the ones I desire most are all older designs like the Sharps, Winchesters, Rolling blocks, basically late 1800’s stuff. The Colt lightning is on top of that list of my grail guns, it has always intrigued me which got me looking at pump action rifles of which there is not a long list.
Anyway, I guess I’m curious why they didn’t catch on, given the popularity of pump shotguns going strong to this day it just seems logical that the same system in a rifle would have caught on and stuck around a bit, at least in the early years.
The most obvious thought is the tube feed ammo issue, but lever actions have that issue and they’re doing pretty good now 150+ years after their inception.
So what do the rifle gurus think, why no love for the pump rifle?
While they're great for any fast hunting situations, which typically occur at short range in moderate to heavy cover, my 7600 genuinely surprised me when I started experimenting with what it's capable of in open terrain. I've even taken it to 660yd range, which was pretty fruitless because of the extreme bullet drop at that distance, but at 300 it proved to be capable of consistent palm-sized 5-shot groups. With off the shelf Remington 200gr Core-Lokt ammo, no less.They are pretty popular here in PA. Most hunting in this area is less then 100yd.
The 03 & 07 Winchesters were semi autos and were not Brownings design.
When I was in high school, I lacked a shotgun for ducks one year, so borrowed my buddies Mossberg 16 gauge Bolt-Action Mossberg(?) with 2-shot magazine. One day, I went to a beaver-bog, off Cross Hill, in Vassalboro and spotted a few wood-ducks near the shore. I sneaked around to get a better angle and kept low. When I popped-up to look around, they were a little too far to shoot, so I crawled closer, behind a rotted stub of a tree near the shore. When I looked up again, there were three teals swimming around, about 15 yards away. I jumped-up and shot one duck on the water, then worked the bolt and got another in the air, but missed the third one. The one shot in the water needed another shot to finish it, which I did. My buddies were in a canoe way out of sight on the other side of the pond and when they called to me, I yelled that there were two ducks in the pond, so they came over and retrieved them for me. When I got home and checked the shotgun, the magazine was missing, so went back to see if I could find it and couldn't, so had to order another one. Those ducks were pretty small, and didn't compensate for having to get a new magazine for my buddies gun. I never borrowed another gun in my life, so it was a good, and relatively cheap lesson to learn.