ddj8052
Member
Mods please move if in the wrong forum.
I just recieved a call from a friend of mine that has a FFL and he is telling me that there was a Lawsuit against the state regarding the legality of certian AR recievers. According to my friend he is stating that the person bring the suit actually one. The court has ruled that unless every AR reciever is named by make and model on the DOJ list than it would no be illegal. In other words every reciever that is listed by name ie: Colt, Armalite, Bushmaster etc. are still illegal. But the small no name companies not listed by name are currently legal. This creates a loop hole. So once listed on the DOJ list then if you possed one of these recievers you would again be able to register it as an assult wepon and build it as you would like.
So I am trying to find out if this is in fact true. Has anyone heard anything about this? I sure would like to get one if this is true. My FFL is supposed to post links to this information for further review. As soon as I get them I will post. Juan
I just recieved a call from a friend of mine that has a FFL and he is telling me that there was a Lawsuit against the state regarding the legality of certian AR recievers. According to my friend he is stating that the person bring the suit actually one. The court has ruled that unless every AR reciever is named by make and model on the DOJ list than it would no be illegal. In other words every reciever that is listed by name ie: Colt, Armalite, Bushmaster etc. are still illegal. But the small no name companies not listed by name are currently legal. This creates a loop hole. So once listed on the DOJ list then if you possed one of these recievers you would again be able to register it as an assult wepon and build it as you would like.
So I am trying to find out if this is in fact true. Has anyone heard anything about this? I sure would like to get one if this is true. My FFL is supposed to post links to this information for further review. As soon as I get them I will post. Juan