bassjam
Member
I like the classics in what they were originally designed for.
1911 - .45
Any other full sized handgun - 9mm - cz75, Beretta 92, High Power, I guess you could throw polymer guns in there as well
Subcompact - 9mm. Controllability is more important to me with tiny guns than making a bigger hole
Microcompact - .380. For what it is, it's a great caliber for those tiny guns
Full sized revolver - .357mag
Snub revolver - .38sp
And .22's in both full size autoloader (Mark series or Buckmark) and full size revolver form (S&W 616). I guess you could throw a .22 in 1911 as well, I wouldn't mind owning one some day.
Rifles are really too much to tackle, but I will say I like having a .22 in semi-auto (both detach mag and tube), bolt action, and single shot form. And a "modern sporting rifle" in 5.56, as well as a bolt action in something like .270/.308/30-06
1911 - .45
Any other full sized handgun - 9mm - cz75, Beretta 92, High Power, I guess you could throw polymer guns in there as well
Subcompact - 9mm. Controllability is more important to me with tiny guns than making a bigger hole
Microcompact - .380. For what it is, it's a great caliber for those tiny guns
Full sized revolver - .357mag
Snub revolver - .38sp
And .22's in both full size autoloader (Mark series or Buckmark) and full size revolver form (S&W 616). I guess you could throw a .22 in 1911 as well, I wouldn't mind owning one some day.
Rifles are really too much to tackle, but I will say I like having a .22 in semi-auto (both detach mag and tube), bolt action, and single shot form. And a "modern sporting rifle" in 5.56, as well as a bolt action in something like .270/.308/30-06