+1, though I do see my extra mag as a means to have on hand additional rounds, just in case... I also keep a supply of extra rounds in the truck. Looking for a KelTec sub-2000 to keep in the truck in case I'm ever in a situation that requires more that a compact 9mm pistolI currently carry a 9mm with 8+1 capacity. Brand and model irrelevant to this conversation. I always carry a spare mag in case of a mag malfunction, not to increase available ammo in case I am attacked by 12 Spetznaz. So I would answer no for myself.
It's 20%-100% more fun, depending on the model you are shooting..
What's it like to have a pistol that uses a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds?
<--- *wonders*
460Kodiak
It's 20%-100% more fun, depending on the model you are shooting.
It's also 20%-100% more expensive as you spend less time reloading magazines on the range.
.
My point, exactly! Hahaha... Thanks for the reply in spite of my rhetorical Q.
MachIVshooter said:That's what we saw during the Clinton ban. .40 and .45 sales were higher relative to 9mm than they are today.
I would.If there was a mag ban that limited magazines to 10 rounds, would current smaller caliber users switch to a larger caliber? Why or why not?