• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Taurus 85 owners...do you love your snubby?

Status
Not open for further replies.

applekev

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
117
Tell us why you love your Taurus 85. I think mine is just a great little handgun. I purchased it about a year ago for the meager sum of $249 brand new from my local gun dealer, Lone Wolf in Glendale, Arizona. It's a blued Ultra Lite with the regular exposed hammer. Lone Wolf always stock these as a regular item although the price has gone up on them. Very accurate and reliable little carry gun for the money.:D
 
I've had an 85 Multi-alloy (aluminum frame, titanium cylinder and barrel shroud) for about 6 or 7 years. Other then a problem with light strikes initially (fixed by Taurus), it's been a super little gun! I carry this one more then any other due to it's light weight (in a pocket).

I've owned at least three other 85's over the years. These were stainless steel models. Nice guns, but too heavy for pocket carry (my primary mode).

I'm kicking around the idea of selling the multi-alloy to buy a DA only or shrouded hammer model...but I'll probably keep the one I have.

So...yeah...if one can love an object, I love this little Moderl 85!
 
Mines a SS UL. Went back to Taurus during the first month because the cylinder release screw threads were stripped. They repaired it and I had it back in 3 weeks. Has worked well for the last 6 months or so. I like it.
 
They're great little guns. I have one that belonged to my dad (i bought it for him as a Christmas present several years before he passed) and it's one of my favorite range/plinking/all around fun guns. It's one gun i'll never get rid of.

I bobbed the hammer and converted it to DA only. It usually wears a pair of Pachmay Compacts, but i found a pair of the old style bannana type grips (like the old S&W J frame grips) on e-bay and a pair of factory target grips (like the S&W Magna grips at a gun show). I also have a pair of Uncle Mike's combat boot grips i use on occassion. Did i mention they're great little guns?
 
I bought one new at the LGS for $188.88. I sold it a while later, but I wish I had bought a dozen at that price and kept the one I had. Oh well.

Anthony
 
Although not my everyday carry gun there are times when in genteel company and want to really hide my gun, I carry this steel frame Taurus 85 loaded with 125 gr +P Rem Golden Sabres. I really like it. A very nice little gun, especially for their going prices.
Picture192.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have mine since 1988 and have put several thousand rounds through it (std pressure no +P) and no problems whatsoever.
 
Have an older model 85CH and wouldn't trade it for the world. Use mostly standard pressure loads when practicing, but practice with +P sparingly. This little revolver has given sterling service. Why not go to www.unitedforums.com and click on the Taurus Forum? Tell them over there if you like your Taurus. Plenty of new members. Like minded owners forum is a good place to discuss related subjects. Have three other Taurus revolvers and am a satisfied customer. Also have Ruger P series pistols. Taurus and Ruger get dumped on regularly without valid criticism. Let me remind everybody all the makers have had quality control or lemons get out from time to time. And there are many satisfied Taurus owners out her even with all the bad hype. Smith and Wesson had reliablity or:) :what: :cool: :D copyright trouble with the 645 or Sigma lines. S&W then re-engineered the pistols and took care of the problems. No one is condemning S&W for this and rightfully so. No one is saying they will not buy another gun from them because of this either. Why do that to other lines as well?
 
Unlocked 004.jpg My Taurus 85 has been 100% reliable with 1K+ rounds, the S&W 36 is a bit moore accurate but the 85 has a smoother action. The M-85 is a bit heavier and has a 1/8" longer barrel, both of these snubbies are pre-lock. I can't bring myself to buy a gun with a interal lock, so I bought the M-36 used.
 
I've had a Ported Titanium 85 for the last 5 years, and it has been 100% flawless thru a LOT of rounds (5K+). Very light, it rides in my pants pocket pretty much 24/7.

Accuracy wise, my buddies and I have had contests to see who can hit the 50 yard 1'x1' steel target with it the most. Myself and another could hit it 5 out of 5 times with good consistancy.
 
The Taurus 85CH was my first carry handgun, having seen a mere year and a half of carry before being replaced by a Glock 19 (and later a Kahr K9). Though fully capable of defending its owner, I'm just not the best shot with a DAO snub. I'm sure the revolver has an innate accuracy I cannot tap, I can squeeze pie-plate 5-shot groups at 20'. Not good, but I suppose good enough for a face pocket gun, albeit a heavy one. The K9 and G19 brought the groups down to 3" or so at the same range, thus the reason for the switch.

Recently, I've been carrying the M85 more often during quick jaunts for Chinese take-out and the such. With the concealed hammer, this Brazilian beauty rides nicely in the pocket and still allows for a hasty draw when needed.
Originally, I carried 158gr SWCHP+Ps, but found them a hit and miss for expansion out of a 2" barrel if the "target" was wearing more than a thin cotton t-shirt. I switched to Winchester's 130gr SXT and Speer's 135gr +P Gold Dot, both JHPs would expand more often than not after 2 layers of denim.

f7adbefb.jpg


Lately, I've fallen for Winchester's 110gr +P+ SJHP Ranger offering. Though hot, the strong steel frame can handle them just fine.

Below demonstrates the expansion capabilities of Winchester's Ranger, compared to 158gr SWCHP+P, also by Winchester. The Ranger's expansion is after 2 layers of denim (it sloughs off a 45gr ring of lead after anything less). The SWCHP+P is after a thick cotton tee in the same Play-Do medium.
One of the selling points in my opinion is the tissue destruction when the 110gr SJHP expands and the incredibly deep penetration when it doesn't, cutting a deep wadcutter-like hole instead.

f9f8ac99.jpg


Though hot hot hot and certainly a bad idea in an alloy frame or questionable quality/condition revolver, a decent steel-frame revolver can handle them in modest amounts. A buddy of mine with two of these cute revolvers is a fan as well. His has seen a few hundred (!!) with no more wear and tear than the other he shoots only mild homespun WC and SWC out of.
 
I bought one from a friend about 5 years back. Great little revolver, would never sell it even though I really never carry it unless it is into the woods with snake shot in the chambers. I can tell it is far superior to the newer Taurus line up.
 
I like my 85UL so far. Smooth action (with a great SA trigger) and tight lockup.

The rear sight trough is cut slightly cockeyed. I was frustrated I didn't catch that when I ran the THR revolver checkout in the store. But after taking the little Taurus shooting a few times, I've found it doesn't make a big difference. Practical accuracy in fast shooting at 7-10 yards is still good. The 85 series' basic sight picture is superior to S&W J-frames (ever notice how shallow the sight trough is on a 642?). So the rough rear notch on my 85UL compares adequately with the S&Ws I've tried. Still, it's a flaw. If not for that, the gun would be the perfect snubby for me.

Overall, the 85s are different enough from the S&W Js to give shooters a real choice. I prefer the grip design, trigger action, and looks of Taurus snubs. The Tauri are a hair larger and heavier, but still carry well in a pocket holster. Some may find that a defect, some an advantage. As I said, we have choices.

I use Speer Gold Dot 135 gr +Ps for carry (and limited practice, about 10 rounds per session). Standard pressure Federal, Win, or Magtech FMJ for general practice.

My take: 85s can be great. But you've got to do a thorough checkout - more so than Smiths. That's what you "pay" in exchange for Taurus's lower price point. This is one reason I think it's often a mistake for a new revolver shooter to start with a Taurus, even though they're cheaper. The knowledgeable shooter who can "size up" a given revolver in the gun shop is more likely to be satisfied.

So be patient, try before buying, and hold out for a good one. Then you'll probably be very happy.
 
After hearing so many great stories about these guns, I picked one up today...brand new, just delivered (saw the UPS guy drop off the box) and I watched the guy log in the gun in one of their logs....So, I figured, okay, it's new production...time to try out these new Taurus wheelguns
What a disappointment :( Trigger was heavy and gritty. At first I thought it was locked, but when I tried to unlock it, the trigger wouldn't move...
Nope, I'm staying away just a little long
 
I have a 85UL with crimson trace grips. What a GREAT combo!!! I love the size, weight, and balance of the 85UL. With the lazer I can hit what I need to with out even bringing it up to properly aim. -------- Anyway, I would love the little gun without the lazer grips (accurate, reliable) but having them makes it even more fun and accurate!!
 
I have a blue steel 85 that has done very well for 15 years now (not too many or very hot rounds, I admit).

I love mine. No problems.
 
Got one in the mid 80's. Stainless. Great little revolver. I love it, but my wife claimed a while back.
 
Mine's a stainless ultralite and I love the thing. Mostly fire light stuff in it, but occasionally +P handloads and it's still tight. It's accurate and reliable and has the best out of the box trigger I've ever felt on a J frame sized gun, really smooth DA! That trigger makes DA shooting a pleasure.

I had the front sight milled for a dove tail for three reasons, I wanted an elevation reference wire installed for light loads, I wanted windage adjustability, and I wanted a black front sight instead of the shiny stainless one. It's my favorite carry revolver, though a recently acquired M66 3" uber-accurate .357 magnum is pretty neat. But, the little UL is light and easy to carry either IWB or in a front pocket.

I'm sure the revolver has an innate accuracy I cannot tap, I can squeeze pie-plate 5-shot groups at 20'.

Mine will put five rounds into 3" at 25 yards. Mowing down6" steel plates at 25 yards DA is a piece of cake! You need a load that will shoot in it, but it seems to like quite a few bullets I've tried in it. It don't do well with lead, though, leads the bore. Might be a little rough in there. So long as I don't push 'em very hot, lead works, though. My light load is a 105 grain cast SWC from a Lee mold moving about 700 fps.

It didn't seem to have a problem in manufacture with the front sight, but shot about 4" left at 25 and that was one reason I wanted the dove tailed front sight. After one range session, I knew this thing was a keeper and decided to spend some money on it personalizing/improving its sights.

attachment.php
 
I heard a Taurus M85 whispering to me at a gun show in November. It is a nice little pistol, 3-inch blued ported barrel, and will be going to the range at my next opportunity. I picked up some speed-loaders for it, and a belt-clip holster, thinking this would make a nice backup carry piece.
 
MCgunner, that's the way it shoud be. I can't believe that front sight configuration is'nt standard equipment :confused:
 
MCGunner, I agree with you on the sights. I don't have an 85, but I do have a 605 and I love it. I carried it for a little over 12 hours straight today, to include a half hour hogging the massage chair in "The Sharper Image" and could have carried it for another 12 without even noticing. It's a great little gun, and I obviously like it enough to depend on it as my main carry gun.
 
What a disappointment Trigger was heavy and gritty. At first I thought it was locked, but when I tried to unlock it, the trigger wouldn't move...
Nope, I'm staying away just a little long

Find an older one! Crazy as it sounds, I bought a new Raging Bull about 5 years back and it too was gritty. Hammer pull was not that bad though. I disassembled it and cleaned out all the blasting media and everything was fine. I called Taurus to give them a piece of my mind about the blasting media in the gun and the lady told me that they leave it in there to smooth out the acton over time. It will work it's way out with normal cleaning. I called BS on here and told her it was my last Taurus product until they "cleaned up" their act. Sad to hear they are still up to it.
 
I just picked up a new model 85 (all steel) this past Thursday, took it to the range Saturday.

It has the slickest da trigger I have ever seen on a J frame size. Much smoother than my Model 36 S&W (1972 vintage). Blasphemy, I know.

The Taurus shoots exactly to point of aim.(again more accurate than the Chief's Special) After drilling the center out of a few paper plates at 21 feet I backed up to 25 yards and continued the joyful blasting.

:D :D :D :D :D :D

Rodger
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top