THE FBI, .38, 9mm: What goes......

Status
Not open for further replies.

UncleEd

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
1,646
Location
N. Georgia
....around seems to truly come around.

Reading parts of a book "Guns of the FBI"
in which the author (retired special agent)
covers the revolvers and then most recently
the autos.

In the heyday of the revolver, the "FBI Load"
which is a 158 grain lead hollow point semi
wad cutter bullet, performed quite well. This
load was also sometimes called the "Chicago
Load" or the "St. Louis Load,."

After the FBI tried the 10mm and then the .40
S&W, it returned to the 9 mm in Glocks. The
load basically chosen is a subsonic 147 grain
hollow point.

And with that I smiled since the 9mm load really
duplicates what the .38 load used to be.

The decision to return to the 9mm was its ease of
handling and also that after studies, it was
concluded that actual real terminal ballistics in
handgun cartridges varies very little be they
magnums, big bores or mid bores.

Placement is the key.

Also hit rates usually are around 30 percent or
less in gun battles.

So, now the FBI has what is basically a .38 that
holds something like 17 or 15 rounds instead of
the usual 6 in revolvers.
 
The FBI chose the Hornady “Critical Duty” load, did it not? 135 grain Flex Lock bullet. The specs are a bit spicier than the old .38 load.

https://www.hornady.com/ammunition/handgun/9mm-luger-p-135-gr-flexlock-critical-duty#!/

You may be correct as of now. The book was referring to a 2015
choice which was a 147 grain Speer Gold Dot standard velocity
with a polymer insert in the hollow point. It was labeled the G2
and was at the time restricted to law enforcement only.

Standard velocity was meant to be subsonic.
 
The FBI chose the Hornady “Critical Duty” load, did it not? 135 grain Flex Lock bullet. The specs are a bit spicier than the old .38 load.
...

Back in 2018 the FBI split its ammunition contracts among 3 companies.
https://www.guns.com/news/2018/04/30/fbi-divides-35m-contract-to-three-ammo-companies

Winchester got 9mm & .40 contracts (still need .40 ammunition during the transition).
https://thinkingafield.org/2018/05/fbi-9mm-contract-awarded-to-winchester-ammunition.html

Hornady got a contract for 9mm.
https://www.americanrifleman.org/ar...r-of-the-week-hornady-wins-fbi-9-mm-contract/

Vista (Federal) got a contract for 9mm training ammunition.
https://www.ammoland.com/2018/04/fb...al-premium-training-ammunition/#axzz6ccWntCek

It's not uncommon for major LE/Gov contracts to be awarded to more than one ammo company. Nowadays it makes sense to have more than one pipeline for duty & training ammo, since you can't predict production and supply issues down the road.

The state ammo contract here in CA was awarded to both Federal and Speer (both part of the Vista umbrella).
 
You may be correct as of now. The book was referring to a 2015

Ah, okay. Thank you. I thought I had missed something. :)


It's not uncommon for major LE/Gov contracts to be awarded to more than one ammo company. Nowadays it makes sense to have more than one pipeline for duty & training ammo, since you can't predict production and supply issues down the road.

Thanks. Good info. :thumbup:
 
....In the heyday of the revolver, the "FBI Load"
which is a 158 grain lead hollow point semi
wad cutter bullet, performed quite well. This
load was also sometimes called the "Chicago
Load" or the "St. Louis Load,." ...

IIRC, that was a Plus-P loading.

Sam
 
I bet a 147 or 134 grain modern hollowpoint expands better and more reliably than the 158gr .38 lead bullets of old..... and all things being equal I’d rather have an approx .50-.60 sized hole than a neat .38 hole, if I had to choose between them.

That being said, from a recoil standpoint I bet they’re very similar. 9mm/.38 seems to be a practical sweet spot in terms of controllability with a realistically practical amount of training, and “enough” stopping power, particularly when optimized through modern bullet technology.

Too, in the old days if .38 was criticized it often fell down when things like shooting through car doors was considered. But older cars were built a lot more stoutly than modern cars, with thicker steel. So it’s probably not as much of a concern for modern 9mm as it may have been for the older .38s.
 
Too, in the old days if .38 was criticized it often fell down when things like shooting through car doors was considered. But older cars were built a lot more stoutly than modern cars, with thicker steel. So it’s probably not as much of a concern for modern 9mm as it may have been for the older .38s.
Steel barrier testing is included in the FBI protocol.
 
Don't forget about the 147 gr JHP .38 Special +P+ utilized for the Model 13 during the .40 cal transition period. I have have some of the Federal Hydra-Shok version and always looking for the Winchester version.
 
Right before I retired I was issued a Glock 19M and Hornady Critical Duty 135 grain ammo. As an FI, I can tell you that the firearms qualification failure rate dropped considerably with the switch back to 9mm. That also can be partly accounted for by the change to the qualification course. In the old course it started at 25 yards with 18 rounds. If you dropped more than 10 of those 18 you failed. The new course started at 3 yards and had far fewer longer range shots...if you did well earlier in the course you could miss all your 25 yards shots and still pass.
 
The recoil question and the fact that many law enforcement agencies ignored it when adopting the .40 S&W was one of the reasons that they are now switching to the 9m.m. I was issued the .40 S&W and my agency went the two different guns, the BERETTA 96D Brigadier (these very accurate guns wore out after one decade of shooting the very powerful ammo we used) and the H&K P-2000. The H&K lasted longer, but was designed for harder recoil and ours had a plastic ring around the spring to help cushion the blow. Still, we went though three different types of ammo to cut the recoil.
We started with a .357 magnum like 155 grain jhp at 1200 fps, then after the BERETTA'S were gone, we adopted the 135 grain jhp at 1200 fps, basically a 9m.m. +P load and ended with the FEDERAL 180 grain HST jhp. This 1010 fps load depended on the high performance of the HST bullet to offset the lack of velocity and it worked well, but still recoiled more than a 9m.m.

Using high performance 9m.m. bullets like the bonded hollow points, I think the 9m.m. is the best compromise.
The .38 Special ruled the police market for decades because in a 2 pound mid size revolver, like the S&W model 10 or 15, it was a great compromise between power, control, practical accuracy (what the average shooter can do with it as opposed to what a nationally ranked target shooter can) and being comfortable to carry all day. THE ONLY REAL PROBLEM WAS THAT IT DID NOT STOP RELIABLY!

Jim
 
I like the Buckeye SD loads ( my loads)
40 S&W 180gr HST
38spl 130gr HST
357 Mag 125gr FTX
10mm 180 GD UW
45 acp 230 gr Golden Saber
9mm 115gr +P Rem
380acp 90gr XTP UW

They are alot of variables when any agency picks a load .... being that agents come in different sizes and skill sets
 
I like the Buckeye SD loads ( my loads)
40 S&W 180gr HST
38spl 130gr HST
357 Mag 125gr FTX
10mm 180 GD UW
45 acp 230 gr Golden Saber
9mm 115gr +P Rem
380acp 90gr XTP UW

They are alot of variables when any agency picks a load .... being that agents come in different sizes and skill sets
True that! As with just about everything, one size doesn’t fit all. There are a lot of compromises, especially with large agencies with a wide variety of people working there.

A quality 9mm +P load like the HST/Golden Saber/SXT/Critical Duty in a mid-sized auto loader will serve agents/officers/deputies well across a vast spectrum of body and hand sizes, gun skills and work assignments.

Stay safe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top