The mystical +1

Status
Not open for further replies.
"In almost any situation a civilian is likely to find him or her self in, one is enough." Not trying to be a jerk here, but I have to assume you haven't seen very many people that have been shot by handguns ?
No, I haven't, but I realize that 1-shot stops are rare, I'm just taking into account the fact that 9 times out of 10, when a civilian defends themselves with a handgun, they don't have to shoot at all. Just the threat of that one bullet is enough.

I like to be more prepared for that 1 time out of ten and carry at least 5 shots.

If carrying 35 rounds makes you feel more comfortable then that's all right by me, I'm just relating my own comfort level.
 
I thought that was where you were coming from with that statement. And, from what I have read, it is true. I always have to wonder about that though. It must be referring to home invasion type situations.
In most states it is illegal to brandish a gun unless you have been presented with a threat of deadly force. Because true threats to one's life are very fast paced, I can't imagine very many situations where you would draw your weapon (in response to a deadly threat) and then not instantly fire. By definition, if there was no need to instantly fire, there were no legal grounds for drawing the weapon.
 
444

That may be true in theory, but by many accounts I've read on this forum and elsewhere, people with evil intent have a tendency to change direction really quickly when confronted with an unexpected weapon. Once an attack is broken off, it would usually be a pretty bad idea to fire.

Rick
 
Andrew the question is, even though you carry seven in the mag, do you add one in the chamber?

with my 7 round magazines, i top off the magazine after chambering a round.

with my 8 rounders, i don't.


I don't like loading 8 rounders to full capacity, because they're harder to seat on reloads.
 
Get FACTORY 8rd Kimber or 8rd Colt magazines. Both are actually CMC Shooting Star magazines. I keep a small ammo case filled with 20 7rd MecGar mags for TEOTWAWKI. The 7rdrs have proven them selves reliable for extreme long term storage.
 
Like my friend who carried illegally in his car for several years which saved him from about a dozen potential car-jackings. Had to pull it 8 times, only had to reach down for it in 4 or 5 instances to get them to back off. Never had to fire.

More than a dozen other times he ran red lights to avoid trouble.
 
I'm just taking into account the fact that 9 times out of 10, when a civilian defends themselves with a handgun, they don't have to shoot at all. Just the threat of that one bullet is enough.
Then why not just play the odds and carry a Remington style Douible Derringer?

That logic also plays right into the gun grabbers theory that no one needs an 11 shot magazine.
 
I think it's really more of psychological/comfort thing (on the user's part). My comfort level starts at six, and after that, it really doesn't matter--six or sixteen. I was just never comfortable with five-shots--whether they were .38, .44 or .45--up it to six, and I'm OK.

That being said, I always stuck with the seven round magazine for the 1911. I never really did trust the eight-rounders--and that includes Shooting Stars (Chip McCormack) and Wilson. I had enough reliability problems with them that they just weren't real comforting.
 
"Its better to have it and not need it than the need it and not have it."

Having an extra round never hurts to have.


I personally like the 8 rounders. Topped off, it is 8 + 1. That's close to 9mm territory in capacity (California "standard" capacity) :D
 
In the bud,

Let's Nip It In The Bud!â„¢

Bernard P. Fife (aka Bernard Milton Fife) carried (depending on which season) either a 5" barreled Colt Official Police or 6" Police Positive Special revolver chambered in .38 Special.

The "bullet" carried in his pocket was a round nosed lead loading. It was more than likely either a 150 grain or 158 grain version.
 
One of my Colt GM's has a problem with Wilson 47D's. The 8 rnd Wilson uses fewer coils with thinner wire in the spring; hence, they start out with a weaker spring. The 7 rnd Wilson, 8 rnd and 10 rnd Shooting Star work just fine. So that Colt pistol gets a factory, USGI or 7 rnd Wilson mag, or an 8 rnd Shooting Star. With the others I use standard Wilson 47D 8 rnd mags, but I don't top them off, it's a second round reliability thing.
 
I think it's really more of psychological/comfort thing (on the user's part).

I am psychologically more comfortable carrying as many rounds as my pistol will hold.:neener: That said, I carry a Kahr with six plus one and a spare mag. I am seriously considering a Glock or Sig if I get some money back from my taxes so I can up the number of rounds in the gun I carry. I will still need my super thin Kahr in some situations though.
 
I am amazed that this is still being discussed.

To me, this would be like going on a cross country car trip and every time you stop for gas you fill the tank 3/4s full.
Why ?
I have no idea: maybe you are so conservative that you just can't allow yourself to take advantage of everytihng offered to you. I always suspected that on my dads side of the family what made the happy was being unhappy: being the martyr or something ???
 
I use a simpler formula for my .45 pistols ...

Reliability first, last & always ... with the "benefit" of an additional round being considered only after the reliability requirement has been addressed.

If there's a difference in reliability in any respect, comparing a 7 or 8 round magazine in a specific .45 platform, then I go with the better reliability.

I've encountered "big name" 8-round 1911 magazines that wouldn't provide the continued level of consistent reliability, with factory ammunition, that I desire ...

Everything being the same? Well, how often is EVERYTHING the same? ;)

I've switched back over to 7-round capacity magazines for my 1911's, by the way ... and I also know some "special folks" that became tired of feeding malfunctions in their 1911's when using 8-round magazines, particularly last-round feeding malfunctions. One fellow told me that he'd been experiencing last-round failures-to-feed in as few as 1200 rounds having been fired from a magazine that was only a few months old.

Everyone's gotta satisfy themselves when it comes right down to it, don't they? ;)
 
"You can't carry too much ammo... unless you're trying to swim... or on fire." -Shamelessly stolen from comp-tac.com

I bought my SIG 229 because it was a good fit for me. I bought the 12rd mags because I couldn't think of a good reason to carry 11rds when I could carry 13rds.

If you can think of a good reason not to carry 7+1, don't.
Is it extra trouble to top off? Certainly.
If you ever need that 8th round it will have been worth every time you topped off.

"nobody who's ever been involved in a two-way pistol match wishes afterwards that they had brought a smaller gun that held fewer bullets". (Great sound bite)
 
My 1911s all like Shooting Star Power Mags and have never choked. I shoot a lot. All but my Colt 1911 El Companero that likes the Shooting Star in 10 rounds of 38 Super. You can have a 1911 in high cap, a 38 super with one in the tube and 10 in the mag. Voila, 11 rounds.
 
fast bolt, I agree than some 191 pattern pistols prefer seven round mages over eight.

But this topic is about ALL semi-auto pistols regardless of magazine capacity.

The original topic was to load the magazine, insert it into the gun, rack a round into the chamber and then NOT refill the magazine. :banghead:


My current carry Colt loves 8 round mags. But I carried for years before there even was such a thing as an 8 round 1911 mag.
So I carried 7+1 in the pistol and 14 extra.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top