The Ultimate Combat Round

Status
Not open for further replies.
Which it does under 150 yards, on average, for our soldiers right now using the green-tip 62 grain bullets. The new 77 grain load looks even better.
 
On average could be 51% of the time. Not good enough. Not for me.
Why abide by the silly Hague Convention? I don't think anyone still cares about that part of the HC anymore (maybe the Euros, but their boys aren't getting shot), so why keep it up? Go frangible.
 
I'd like to see M855 doing 2900 fps from a 14.5 inch M4 barrel. I shot a lot of MilSurp M855 from my daughters 14.5 inch AR, as well as my own 16 inch model. 2750 is more like it.
 
I don't think you meant that...according to my info the .220 Russian is based on the same case diamater as the 7.62x39, which is wider than the 5.45x39.

I meant ballistically, not literally.

Case head on the 5.45 is 0.394 vs 0.445. I've always been curious why the Russians redesigned the case for the 5.45, rather than just necking down the M43.
 
The M16/AR-15 locking system is rated at about 55,000 PSI. In order to get M855 to a spec'd velocity of 3000 fps from a 20 inch bbl, you need about 53,800 PSI in military brass. There's not much you can do in the way of increasing pressure.
 
Yeah, I didn't think the M855 was that fast.
Guntech, I think they did it to get more rounds in less space. Though, to be fair, they seem to have taken up the same amount of space with the 5.45 as with the 7.62.
But the rounds are significantly lighter.
 
Without a doubt, the M74 is smaller and lighter than the M43. And has about 5gn less capacity. It doesn't quite measure up to the 223. IIRC, it's about a 50gn projectile at 3000 fps, vs the M193 with a 55gn projectile at 3300 fps or the M855 with a 62gn projectile at 3000 fps.

Tony will undoubtedly correct me (and rightly so).
 
This discussion about non-HC round has me thinking. I've been using Barnes TSX in my 223 for hunting, and I wonder how this bullet would rate as a practical round. It has good penetration, and also a very good reputation on game.

Can anyone suggest some tests for this bullet? Gelatin tests are already available. Plus, it's an all copper bullet - more environmentally friendly that lead. :)

http://www.barnesbullets.com/information/bullet-talk/x-citing-facts/

http://www.videosift.com/video/Hollow-Point-Bullet-Through-Gelatine
 
I have a question:
What is the difference between case volume of the 5.56 and the 5.45?
It seems like they should have roughly equal case volume, but the 5.45 performs so much worse than the 5.56.
 
5.45x39: 28gn water
5.56x45: 30gn water

Not much, but 5.45 is loaded to a lower pressure - 3800 bar vs 4050 for 5.56.
 
It's working to taking them out of the fight, which serves strategic goals, but body count is always better as this has a greater effect on the morale of a nation.

I would only contest this in terms of Asym Warfare, in that the expense and psychological damage of wounded troops, along with the immediate care and attention required can be equal if not worse at times than a KIA.

gotta love the .308

5.56 comes in a close second for me, but the 308 is quite the handsome chap in the fray
 
That explains it.
Why don't they load it hotter?

My guess?

Because it's steel-cased.

How about we take a harder look at the 220 Russian. There are already some decent, high BC bullets in the .5 region that ought to be able to fill out the OAL, and since the case taper isn't changed versus M43, it ought to feed from AK magazines.
 
Does a perfect combat round exist? Absolutely not. There are too many factors at play. From target armour, to range, to compatability with existing platforms (or not)--and that's the easy question. The tougher question, the one that has nothing to do with chamber pressure, is the big picture. Does the US war machine and NATO have the resources to change? The answer is no. Until a significant change occurs in infantry tactics that necessitates a change, change will not occur.

We will not see a 6-7mm universal infantry round for 10 to 20 years, until the M16/M4 will be neary the end of it's life cycle. At that time, metallic cartridges may no longer be the best option.

What we will see is continued development of 5.56mm. Imagine a 77gr. round with continued fragmentation performance and enhanced penetration capability. That's next.
 
Improved powders:

Quoted from Page 11 of the January 2008 Rifle Magazine.

"HODGDON, ETC.
Since a good number of Rifle readers are handloaders, Hodgdon the folks who market and/or manufacture several powders, including Hodgdon, IMR,
Winchester and Vihtavuori, as well as Pyrodex and Triple Seven has introduced a canister powder they are calling a “technological wonder,” HYBRID 100V. With the moniker like that you would expect a three-wheeled Toyoishu that runs on a mix of U-235 and moose urine. Early returns indicate optimum velocities around 100 fps faster than current standards with a 150 grain bullet in the .300 Weatherby Magnum. As a rule, the fit is with H-4350.
Chris Hodgdon tells us HYBRID 100V is a mix of spherical and extruded shape kernels that help the powder pour accurately and smoothly through a measure, which, in turn, should aid accuracy. Delivery is expected in the
spring of 2008. This powder should be a nice fit for the 110, 120 and 130 grain TTSX in the .270, 7mm and .300 magnums, respectively including short/fat, aka “chubby,” and belted."


Here's more:

"Media Release

Contact:
Chris Hodgdon
Marketing/Sales
Hodgdon Powder Company
Phone: 913-362-9455 ext 120
Fax: 913-362-1307
Email: [email protected]

October 2007

For Immediate Release

Hybrid 100V™ - a technological marvel

Shawnee Mission Kansas, October 2, 2007 – Hodgdon®-The Gun Powder People™, supplier of Hodgdon®, IMR®, Winchester®, and Vihtouvori® smokeless propellants, as well as Pyrodex® and Triple Se7en® muzzleloading Pellets and Granular propellants, introduces HYBRID 100V™. This is a technological wonder that marries two technologies: the chemistry of a Spherical powder with the geometry of an Extruded propellant.

Ideal for use in calibers that fit H4350, HYBRID 100V delivers stunning velocities not seen before in a variety of popular cartridges, such as 3,310fps for a 150-grain bullet in the 300 Weatherby Magnum –nearly 100fps faster than the nearest competitor. Its unique small grain, part Spherical, part Extruded shape benefits the handloader in two ways; the powder accurately flows smoothly and easily through a measure and charge weights are consistent for ideal load density and pinpoint accuracy. HYBRID 100V sets the performance standard with a winning precision target shooting and big game hunting experience.

HYBRID 100V in one and eight pound containers will be at Hodgdon dealers everywhere spring 2008. Complete data is complementary and available 24/7 at the hodgdon.com Reloading Data Center. For more information contact Hodgdon Powder Company at 913-362-9455 or by mail at 6231 Robinson, Shawnee Mission Kansas 66202. For your powder choice it’s Hodgdon, the Brand that’s True."


So it looks like the "Light Magnum" powders are coming to market. This http://www.gd-ots.com/sitepages/propulsionsolu.html link has a picture of the granules and mentions powders for small capacity cases.
 
I had an idea last night while in bed.
Why not blow out a 5.56 case to 9mm (don't make it straight-walled, just de-neck it), and then use a 77- or 82-grain streamlined 5.56mm bullet inside a sabot?
Wouldn't that give you better velocity because of the larger base upon which to push (plus the powders wouldn't have to circumvent a neck, just push and go)?
 
I also have played around with cartridge cases in my Load From a Disk software. Unfortunately I can't figure out how to import anything to here.:banghead: But I've been playing around with .470 diameter cases to increase capacity while keeping the 2.265" OAL so as to fit the current platform. Imagine the 6.5 BR but with the case lengthened to 1.6". I had a member here double stack .45 ACP(same diameter brass) in his 6.5 Grendel mag so a shortened 6.5 Lapua or Creedmore might function from Grendel mags. If not, although it would require some milling to the inside of the magwell, I don't see why M1A or AR-10 mags can't be shortened to fit. So, instead of using the 7.62x39 or 45 case diameter why not go bigger? The .470 AR-15 bolt heads are available.

The Brass wouldn't allow retrofitting 6.8 or 6.5 uppers and mags, as much as I wish that they would I don't see them issuing a completely new, longer OAL platform. It seems to me that the only way to increase case capacity over the 6.5G is to use wider brass, a touch longer overall, and a short neck.

Reliable feeding? I don't hear any complaints about the 45 ACP feeding and it's way shorter than 2.265. And with a much larger meplat bullet.
 
Okay, assuming a 6.5mm bullet at 2800/2900 f/s (6.5x45mm GT; 6.7x45mm Firebrand), I've come up with a rifle to match:
ApacheAssaultRifleShaded.jpg
It's called the Keti Assault Rifle (after a dotcomrade of mine who took interest in it early on), it's based on the AK-47 action scaled down slightly and modified significantly. The action hinges open like an FAL or M16 and has an M16-style safety/selector and magwell. The stocks shown are very basic (stocks with rails and variable positions are in the works) as are the sights. The small black area just forward and over the trigger guard is actually the mag release; it didn't show up well when I scanned the picture. The rifle is chambered for 6.5 GT or 6.7 Firebrand (both are approximately the same length, 6.5 GT is 2mm longer than 6.7 Firebrand) and has a 30-round magazine for each. There really isn't much else to say about it, it's relatively conventional, just a collage of good features taken from various other rifles.
 
As an interesting aside, I designed a semiauto version on the Keti to fire a big ole' honking .50-caliber cartridge based off of the .500 S&W lengthened to fit the OAL of the rifle. The rifle had an 8" barrel and was able to work off of the lower of the Keti. Haven't named it yet, and I'm still working on the design.
 
I had an idea last night while in bed.
Why not blow out a 5.56 case to 9mm (don't make it straight-walled, just de-neck it), and then use a 77- or 82-grain streamlined 5.56mm bullet inside a sabot?
Wouldn't that give you better velocity because of the larger base upon which to push (plus the powders wouldn't have to circumvent a neck, just push and go)?
You're far from the first to think of that one ;)

To get a 9mm calibre on the 5.56x45 case it would in fact have to be straight, with no shoulder at all. My idea was to use a full-calibre bullet for close-in engagements against unprotected personnel (plus a heavy-bullet subsonic version would work very well with a suppressor) and a saboted tungsten-alloy bullet to deal with body armour, or reach out a long way.

The benchrest accuracy with a sabot would be down somewhat, but the high velocity and flat trajectory would compensate for that under combat conditions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top