GoInnaWoods
Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2017
- Messages
- 5
I am looking to get my first (wholly owned) pistol. It's going to be a .22, in the traditional form factor. It will be mainly for building skills and plinking, cheap practice, and maybe later down the line I'll keep if for a small survival/hunting piece. I am looking for something that is (1) reliable (especially with cheaper ammo) (2) can get buy with moderate cleaning (i.e. isn't a pretty princess that needs to be wiped down every 75 rounds, (3) accurate. Fit and aftermarket support/whizz-bang gadget are welcome, but take a back seat to the first three (though I would like to be able to suppress it eventually). As I said, I want the traditional styling, that leave the Ruger 22/45 (I dont like the Luger-type grip of the other Mk's), Browning Buckmark, and S&W victory. The Buckmark fits my hand the best, but I have heard of some reliability issues, and all these grips/controls are similar enough that I could probably get accustomed to any of them. I've handled and dry fired them all, but I would like a little more info before I decide what to rent. So, how do they compare in:
- Reliability (including mag quality)
- Rate of cleaning
- Accuracy
- Trigger (I've tested them out, and generally have some idea of what is a "good" trigger, but I feel that more experienced people will be able to enlighten me on which one(s) will be more beneficial in terms of skill building/reinforcing and accuracy)
Thanks
- Reliability (including mag quality)
- Rate of cleaning
- Accuracy
- Trigger (I've tested them out, and generally have some idea of what is a "good" trigger, but I feel that more experienced people will be able to enlighten me on which one(s) will be more beneficial in terms of skill building/reinforcing and accuracy)
Thanks