USA: "New Ashcroft Power Has Gun Control Supporters Fuming"

Status
Not open for further replies.

cuchulainn

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
3,297
Location
Looking for a cow that Queen Meadhbh stole
from U.S. Newswire

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=166-06242003
New Ashcroft Power Has Gun Control Supporters Fuming

6/24/03 7:04:00 PM

To: National Desk, Media Reporter

Contact: Bob Cusack of The Hill, 202-628-8350

WASHINGTON, June 24 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Gun control supporters are concerned about a provision in the Homeland Security Act that gives Attorney General John Ashcroft, a supporter of gun owners' rights, the authority to select the head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), Business & Lobbying Editor Bob Cusack reports in the June 25, 2003, issue of The Hill.

ATF was moved from the Treasury Department to the Justice Department under the homeland security reorganization. Under Treasury, the ATF head was customarily a career civil servant; now the position has been upgraded to a political level. "Oh, geez, that could be extremely dangerous," said Chris McGrath, executive director of the group Handgun-Free America.

---

By Bob Cusack

To the surprise and dismay of gun control advocates, a little-noticed provision in the Homeland Security Act gives Attorney General John Ashcroft the authority to select the head of a government agency charged with enforcing gun laws.

Although the sensitive position has been upgraded under the new law to a political level, it remains exempt from Senate confirmation.

Gun control groups accuse Ashcroft of being the most pro-gun attorney general in recent history. When told that Ashcroft has free rein to choose whomever he wants to head the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), key gun control advocates said they were unaware of the change.

Prior to the reorganization, the ATF director was named by the secretary of the Treasury and reported to the under secretary for enforcement. By custom, he was also a career civil servant, The Homeland Security Act of 2002 transferred the law enforcement agency from Treasury to the Department of Justice.

While prior directors of ATF were also not subject to Senate confirmation, it nevertheless has surprised and irked some gun experts that Congress did not require Senate approval under the post 9-11 reorganization plan.

The Homeland Security Act states, "The (ATF) director shall be appointed by the attorney general and shall perform such functions as the attorney general shall direct."

This language worries Chris McGrath, executive director of Handgun-Free America. When told Ashcroft is now in charge of selecting the next head of ATF, McGrath said, "Oh, geez, that could be extremely dangerous. Ashcroft aligns himself with the NRA (National Rifle Association)....ATF's move to Justice theoretically makes sense, but the problem is that it's under Ashcroft."

The selection of an ATF director is a key decision for Ashcroft because it could attract controversy against the backdrop of the coming 2004 election.

ATF agents, inspectors, and support staff have been involved in investigating some of the most violent crimes in society, in regulating some of the most important and sensitive industries in America, and in collecting more than $15 billion in annual revenue.

The agency is broadly charged with enforcing federal laws and regulations that relate to alcohol, tobacco, firearms, explosives and arson.

Ashcroft could possibly dodge a public relations uproar by naming acting director Bradley A. Buckles to the post. Buckles, who has been acting chief since 1999, is widely respected among ATF employees.

But some speculate that the NRA, which years ago referred to ATF agents as "jack-booted government thugs," would rather have an ATF director who has a strong pro-gun rights record.

An NRA spokeswoman said the group is not lobbying for any candidate for ATF. Gun control advocates dispute this claim, arguing that there is no way that NRA has adopted a hands-off lobbying approach.

Mathew Nosanchuk, litigation director and legislative counsel for the Violence Policy Center, said previous ATF directors have enforced gun laws. Now that the ATF post is a political appointee, "there is a potential for meddling" that "could heighten tension between the FBI and ATF," Nosanchuk said.

He added that this issue underscores the larger concerns over what has happened to ATF under Ashcroft's watch.

"People (at ATF) are already concerned with (Ashcroft's policies,)" McGrath echoed.

McGrath pointed out that in late 2001, Ashcroft issued a memo to all U.S. attorneys that significantly changed the government's policies on the Second Amendment, putting a greater emphasis on gun owners' rights.

A spokesperson for Ashcroft did not respond to a request for comment.

It is unclear whether Ashcroft will soon announce his selection for ATF. But some observers speculate that if the administration wants to appoint a controversial candidate, it will do so this year so that any controversy would subside in the 2004 campaign season.

Gun control has not dominated the political scene recently and political experts believe the White House does not want to put the issue back on the table. NRA this year is pushing for a gun liability bill and a repeal of the federal assault weapons ban, which will expire in September 2004 unless Congress renews it.

President Bush supports the repeal of the ban, but has not particularly championed the cause. The president's tepid support has some political observers believing that Bush does not want to risk the "soccer mom" vote by pushing a gun rights agenda as he revs up to seek a second term.

© 2003 U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/
 
Neato, but let's not forget that the document also gives Hillary's AG appointment powers.

Maybe she'll give Lon Horiuchi the job.
 
Evil thought:
What would be the first thing Ron Barrett (owner of Barrett, did I get his first name right?) would do if he was appointed to head the ATFe? :evil:

Kharn
 
The Bureau is weird conglomoration of things that have nothing to do with one another. Alcohol and Tobaco should be regulated by the FDA (if anyone) and Firearms in and of themselves should not be a concern for government. Therefore, the best apointment to head this bureau would be .... No one. It should be eliminated.
 
Firearms in and of themselves should not be a concern for government
The ATF serves a legitimate function, at least the firearms part of it. There have been abuses and they should be made accountable for those, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
 
Sorry Rock Jock, but the BATFE does not serve any valid investigative function with relation to firearms that couldn't be done better by the FBI, without the addition of more letters to the bowl of alphabet soup and an overinflated budget.
 
Justin:
Now we both know that in 20 years, the BATFe will still be around, but it will be known as the bATFecdghijklmnopqrsuvwxyz and will control every level of our daily lives. :neener:

Kharn
 
lol.gif
 
Justin,

The FBI is an investigative branch. As long as we have laws of any type regulating the sale or transfer of firearms, at least across state lines, we will need a govt. agency to administer those regs for FFLs. The FBI is not equipped, nor should they be involved in, simple inspections and record-keeping. I do agree that investigations of firearm-related crimes should probably be left up to the FBI, though.
 
McGrath pointed out that in late 2001, Ashcroft issued a memo to all U.S. attorneys that significantly changed the government's policies on the Second Amendment, putting a greater emphasis on gun owners' rights.

I would like to see that memo.
 
Last Saturday, during the Meeting of Members at NRA's 130th Annual Meetings & Exhibits in Kansas City, Mo., NRA-ILA Executive Director James Jay Baker read from a May 17, 2001, letter from U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft that spelled out the AG's views on the Second Amendment. Ashcroft wrote, "[L]et me state unequivocally....the Second Amendment clearly protect(s) the right of individuals to keep and bear firearms."

AG Ashcroft Confirms Second Amendment Protects Individual Right
 
It may work in our favor while there's a pro-gun administration but once an anti gets in, it's to the hills boys!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top