What happens when an avowed anti-gun crusader picks up a revolver?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Gun Nut
What happens when an avowed anti-gun crusader picks up a revolver?

Louise Rafkin Sunday, July 20, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Up front you need to know that I have always been an avid anti-gun crusader. I cringe when reading headlines about accidental shootings and curse politicians who block gun control laws. I consider "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" the most cleverly concocted slogan in the history of spin.

You need to know this, but this is not what I tell the gun safety instructor at a local rifle range who is set to lead me through a basic handgun lesson, which will conclude with me shooting real weapons stocked with live ammo. Though I don't share my political convictions with the gracious instructor, I do admit I've always wondered what it's like to handle a gun. The idea of shooting seems both interesting, terrifying - and slightly naughty.

Good lefty girls don't shoot guns.

My instructor, an ex-policewoman, is a trim, 45-year-old powerhouse who has been shooting guns for more than 20 years. From beneath her well-ordered desk, she produces two gleaming specimens: a shining silver revolver and a matte black semiautomatic. I'm a little scared, but also mesmerized. "They're quite beautiful," I blurt out before I realize what I've said.

"People fall in love with guns," she says, obviously infatuated herself.

Over the next hour, I learn more than I thought I'd ever want to know about guns. I'm not mechanically minded, and I've never understood how a gun actually works. I still don't, even after I'm shown in exacting detail. "Think about how a champagne cork pops," she tells me.

I even look down the barrel of the revolver, which is, oddly, spiraled inside. "That's the rifle," I'm told. "Rifling helps the ammo fly straighter, longer." I also learn that "full metal jacket" is not just the title of a movie, but the name given by the U.S. military to the copper casing on a lead bullet. At some point, it was discovered that a full "jacket" was more lethal to humans than a half-clothed slug. "It was when they realized it was more efficient to clean up dead bodies than treat the wounded," my instructor says gravely.

My growing pro-gun mentality momentarily wanes.

I'm shown levers and buttons and triggers, and I'm soon handling both pieces without much fear. Loading the revolver is easy; slipping the "rounds" into the channels of steel feels reminiscent of playing with children's blocks.

But loading the semiautomatic is difficult: Stacking the cone-shaped slugs on top of one another in their removable magazine somehow underscores how lethal this weapon is.

Eventually, we're off to the shooting range. The lanes, arranged like a bowling alley, are polka-dotted with bullet holes - evidence of really poor shooting. Next to me are a pair of off-duty police officers; one fires. Tense as a fence, I jump completely off the ground. My heart is working overtime and I feel slightly claustrophobic inside safety glasses and ear protectors.

I set my feet apart, extend my arms, and focus down the barrel to a paper target run out on a taut wire. With my left thumb, I cock the trigger. And then, after only a slight hesitation, I flex. The noise is loud and jarring, but the recoil isn't bad. A surge of adrenaline jolts through my chest and a slight tingling floods the back of my neck. Though it wasn't all that easy to pull the trigger back - I had to put some real pressure on it - I feel like I've broken through some kind of invisible barrier: I'm no longer a gun virgin.

And, wonder of wonders, peering out past my still-extended arms, I see I have hit the target. Not the bull's-eye, but one of the inner rings. Suddenly, I feel a little like I'm playing a carnival game and I'm driven to win the big stuffed bear. I take time setting up the next shots, gloating only a little when my hand-eye coordination is lauded.

After a few rounds, I trade the now-warm revolver and pick up the semiautomatic. The feel of this more powerful weapon is different. I have a creepy split-second insight: I could - if I wanted to - turn, pull the trigger and shoot dead everyone in sight. Suddenly I think of those crimes of passion I've read about: people who "go off" at their boss or the kid at the Kmart who can't work the register. Guns are so clearly about quick, non-intimate power. Anyone with access to a few hundred dollars can buy a final say. Uneasy, I return my concentration to shooting. By the time the target is reeled in, a ring of half-inch holes clusters within inches of the center dot.

Driving home, I'm exhausted, as if I've worked out. But I'm also a little exhilarated. Have I changed? If I absolutely had to - for self-defense; in defense of others - would I use a gun?

I don't know. But I might go shooting again, especially if there were a place to shoot that didn't feel so odd. Perhaps a combination shooting range, bookstore and coffee shop with colorful targets designed by fabulous artists?

Later, I phone an anti-gun friend. "I know how to unload a gun," I say, trying to convince her of the merits of my adventure. "Target shooting seems fun. Going for the bull's-eye and all."

"Try darts," she says flatly.




Aside from writing, Louise Rafkin is a lifelong martial artist and teaches self-defense and Indonesian karate in North Oakland.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/07/20/CM141915.DTL
 
Bad Instructor...BAD...............

I'm sorry but what type of instructor tells their student:

"It was when they realized it was more efficient to clean up dead bodies than treat the wounded," my instructor says gravely.

Do any of the other instructors that float on this board do this with their students?

Finally, the following quote explains to us why the anti's do not want us to have guns. They do not want us to have them because they think all gun owners feel the way she does, and I quote:

"I have a creepy split-second insight: I could - if I wanted to - turn, pull the trigger and shoot dead everyone in sight."

Anti's are very scary people! I have never thought like that in my life!
 
Anti's are very scary people! I have never thought like that in my life!
Well, I dont think to do stuff like that, but I do think of the things that are within the realm of possibility, and a quick person with a handgun can take out a significant number of people before anyone realizes what is going on. But I also consider what my actions would be if said thing could happen.

Scary stuff indeed.
 
Do any of the other instructors that float on this board do this with their students?
I would never tell students something like that, mostly because it isn't true. She has it exactly backwards.

FMJ bullets are meant to resist expansion in order to decrease the magnitude (and ghastly nature) of bullet wounds. Generals and such go along with the practice because they understand that one of the side benefits of FMJ is the high number of causualties that will live at least long enough to be taken off the field and treated for their wounds.

That means that the enemy will be expending time, resources, personnel, etc. on what have effectively become non-combatants.

But what can one expect from Kommiefornians?
 
The things that jump right out:

I'm not mechanically minded, and I've never understood how a gun actually works./QUOTE]

I even look down the barrel of the revolver,

I have a creepy split-second insight: I could - if I wanted to - turn, pull the trigger and shoot dead everyone in sight.

For a couple seconds, until the range officer and the other folks at the _shooting_ _range_ figure out they're being shot at.


Give her some time. A few more range sessions and she might turn out all right.
 
She is typical of most brainwashed leftist anti's I've had the displeasure of meeting.

I've taken some anti gunners shooting and they had a "fabulous time".

Their views didn't change much but at least a seed of an idea was planted that guns aren't evil and gun owners aren't ignorant cross burning rednecks.

Anti-gunners don't trust themselves and are prone to irrational fears regarding things they don't understand. At least from my observation.

Its kind of like a teetotaler who has never taken a drink.

There is strong temptation to partake of the forbidden evil pleasure of booze even though they constantly preach and lobby against the sins of
drinking.

They fear that one drink will turn them into a staggering alcoholic.

Anti gunners think a gun will turn them into a mass murderer.
 
"I could - if I wanted to - turn, pull the trigger and shoot dead everyone in sight"

I cannot for the life of me understand this statement, nor the mentality from which it came.

Shawn
 
Hoplophobes...

Ya gotta wonder how she manages to cut up a turkey at Thanksgiving and not pause for a second and look around the table with a funny look on her face...

Enough weirdness in that article to spook most bliss-ninnies.

Still and all; she came, she saw, she...

Adios
 
Mark-
Freud’s not the one to call, for him most everything has to do with fornication and sexual gratification.
_______
I understand not being mechanical minded but HOW can you not see how a gun works... its pretty simple... i mean the basics of it...

______
I am taking some Anti's/never held and fired a gun before types to the range in a few weeks (co-workers who learned I recently purchased a gun). So I find it interesting that someone who has never held a gun may think that, so I shall have to learn from such a umm personality and try to steer away from things that can cause thoughts like that.
 
That so-called instructor is nuts. Mind you, the last people who should be teaching new shooters are cops. Given the never ending reports of their careless use of firearms.
 
I cannot for the life of me understand this statement, nor the mentality from which it came.

http://www.jpfo.org/ragingagainstselfdefense.htm

How does my correspondent "know" that his neighbors would murder him if they had guns? He doesn't. What he was really saying was that if he had a gun, he might murder his neighbors if he had a bad day, or if they took his parking space, or played their stereos too loud. This is an example of what mental health professionals call projection – unconsciously projecting one's own unacceptable feelings onto other people, so that one doesn't have to own them.3 In some cases, the intolerable feelings are projected not onto a person, but onto an inanimate object, such as a gun,4 so that the projector believes the gun itself will murder him.

Projection is a defense mechanism. Defense mechanisms are unconscious psychological mechanisms that protect us from feelings that we cannot consciously accept.5 They operate without our awareness, so that we don't have to deal consciously with "forbidden" feelings and impulses. Thus, if you asked my e-mail correspondent if he really wanted to murder his neighbors, he would vehemently deny it, and insist that other people want to kill him.
 
gun-fucious That is my type of website... (I am a Psychology and sociology DBL major) What else do you have up your sleeve??
 
At some point, it was discovered that a full "jacket" was more lethal to humans than a half-clothed slug. "It was when they realized it was more efficient to clean up dead bodies than treat the wounded," my instructor says gravely.
Maybe an instructor, but almost certainly not an NRA certified instructor.

You're not even supposed to use the word weapon in a Basic Firearms course if you are an NRA certified instructor. The wisdom of that rule becomes suddenly, glaringly apparent.
 
I have a creepy split-second insight: I could - if I wanted to - turn, pull the trigger and shoot dead everyone in sight.

One wonders if this could be a 'hidden agenda' in that someone so horribly, violently revolted by the concept of firearms could some day twist off and further that agenda by making themselves the 'worst case scenario' they rail against so.

Stockton, CA type incidents come to mind.

Regards,
Rabbit.
 
"I have a creepy split-second
insight: I could - if I wanted to - turn, pull the trigger and shoot dead everyone in
sight. Suddenly I think of those crimes of passion I've read about : people who "go
off" at their boss or the kid at the Kmart who can't work the register. Guns are so
clearly about quick, non-intimate power. Anyone with access to a few hundred
dollars can buy a final say. Uneasy, I return my concentration to shooting. By the
time the target is reeled in, a ring of half-inch holes clusters within inches of the
center dot."

I've had more than one anti- tell me he/she would never get a gun because
he/she would probably start blowing people away. One reason they are
anti-s is that they think that WE are like THEM.
 
Interesting, but in my experiance antis seem to become less rabid after they go to psychotherapy or otherwise undergo a "corrective" experiance to make them more mature. I firmly believe Freud was right about them.
 
A very important lesson from this story:

Being a police officer and/or shooting for many years does NOT make someone an expert on firearms.
 
"I cock the trigger..." ?

Y'all are missing the point. I think that this person, like most:rolleyes: journalists, needs to learn to read, write , and speak the English language before she's allowed access to scissors with points on them, let alone a firearm!
 
On second thought, the article is pure propaganda.

The whole point is that semi-autos are REALLY EVIL. Much more so than revolvers.

While shooting the revolver, she focused on the sensation of shooting. She's hitting the target, it's like a game, it's like being at the carnival, she's gloating over her newfound marksmanship skills, she thinks of stuffed animals. Loading the revolver is easy, like playing with blocks...

THEN (DUM Dum dum)

She picked up the semi-auto and was stricken by the intrinsic evil of the weapon. Her thoughts turned to carnage, mass murder. She realizes that this weapon will corrupt some people. She is uneasy as she gets back to shooting. Just loading the weapon is sinister, difficult, somehow imparts a feeling of lethality...

After re-reading the piece, it seems entirely likely that she's never shot a gun in her life and she made up this piece to give her starting premise that semi-autos are ESPECIALLY evil a little credibility.
 
Maybe i'm the only strange one...

...as I have had thoughts similar to this woman, but not even close to what she has had. I only mean this in the "i have the potential for massive destruction/death at my control...i wonder..." sort of feeling. However, NEVER yet has it been with a gun. I say yet, as I am human, and my mind runs a million miles an hour sometimes. Most often this feeling is while driving my car down the high/freeway, and then, most often while going around curvy off/on ramps. HOWEVER, this does NOT mean I'm suicidial, have a desire to take out lots of people, want to trash my car, or anything of the sort. I'm just curious, and my mind wanders. I think that this is normal, and anyone who denies having thoughts of this nature even occasionally, is lying to themself. You don't have to tell anyone, just don't think that you never have them.

Two final thoughts. Again, maybe I'm the only strange one (besides this woman). Secondly, when I have these thoughts, they don't scare me, because I'm intelligent enough to realize that as long as I never act on them, they'll never be a problem. I just hope others are as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top