My question is why? Is it so the general public will show lest interest in reading the bill? Or so they can sneak provisions in the bill that someone would have to sort though 1000 pages of legal jargon BS to find? I've attempted to read a few bills. And I've got a pretty decent vocabulary. But I found myself spending more time looking words up in a thesaurus than actually reading. Then the "mainstream" media give us a 10 second explanation of the bill and it's obvious it's not inclusive of any details and clearly biased. Especially if it means raising taxes or limiting rights of citizens.You have just demonstrated more common sense than the entire body and, in doing so using less than 35,000 words, have violated the "Bamboozle Principle" which requires that anything to be said be must be said using, at a minimum, twenty times more words than needed, preferably ambiguous or confounding in nature.
KISS- Keep It Simple Stupid. If they did that, it wouldn't take 100 hour sessions of congress for every bill to be passed or rejected. We aren't all lawyers. But every bill affects us. I would think a bill should be able to be understood by the vast majority of citizens without giving them headaches or anxiety attacks.
But I give the proposal a 40/60 chance.