i'm starting this thread because I don't want to hijack anyone else's threads and this is a different OP. Apparently the NRA, president, White House, and everyone else is ready to ban bump stocks. I have no interest in a bump stock but I would worry about the NRA and other pro-gun groups ok with banning certain items every time there could be a mass shooting.
House Speaker Paul Ryan pulled the SHARE Act (with Hearing Protection Act included) from being heard almost immediately after the Las Vegas shooting. Many have said it's better to pull a bill if you know that it's not going to pass which is probably better than a defeat.
I believe that after a short time the scrutiny on the 2nd Amendment will die down and it could be a chance for the SHARE Act to once again be up or a vote.
Do you think that by sacrificing bump stocks the GOP thinks it could preserve a chance for the SHARE Act (with HPA included) to pass and be signed into law by the president?
** I know that everyone wants to say suppressors but most people know them as their original name, silencers.
House Speaker Paul Ryan pulled the SHARE Act (with Hearing Protection Act included) from being heard almost immediately after the Las Vegas shooting. Many have said it's better to pull a bill if you know that it's not going to pass which is probably better than a defeat.
I believe that after a short time the scrutiny on the 2nd Amendment will die down and it could be a chance for the SHARE Act to once again be up or a vote.
Do you think that by sacrificing bump stocks the GOP thinks it could preserve a chance for the SHARE Act (with HPA included) to pass and be signed into law by the president?
** I know that everyone wants to say suppressors but most people know them as their original name, silencers.