WestKentucky
Member
I have one. Neat rifle for sure but in no way worth what they bringif you can find one that's not worn to a nubbin and afford the astronomical ask price the Marlin levermatic in 30 carbine is a cool little rifle
I have one. Neat rifle for sure but in no way worth what they bringif you can find one that's not worn to a nubbin and afford the astronomical ask price the Marlin levermatic in 30 carbine is a cool little rifle
Those are neat guns. Comically large, you can't help but laugh when you shoot it, if you can handle the recoil, if you can't some people might cry and have seen plenty of people take a nice BONK! to their noodle when some jackwagon gives an inexperienced shooter a BBR/BFR for youtube clicks.Wasn't there a BFR made in it as well. It be fun if Henry made one chambered in it. I saw a video recently on ammo prices and Rural King was selling ammo for $20 a box. So price of ammo isn't as bad as it used to be, if you can find it.
That would have saved the gov’t a ton of money with cheap and easy conversions and no spending for new purchases.It was. Melvyn Johnson came up with a simple conversion called the 5.7 Spitfire, aka 22 Spitfire, 5.7 MMJ. He had military conversions in mind but nobody bit and then he offered it commercially for a number of years. Think of it conceptually as the .300 Blackout idea in reverse.
spitfire
www.johnsonautomatics.com
.22 Spitfire - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
No. That was for the 30pedersen, which was the 8mm French Long with a US name on it.*Wasn't the Pederson device for the 1903 Springfields made to convert a standard issue bolt action rifle to a semi-auto platform firing the M1 Carbine round?
According to Bruce Canfield's book on Johnson, that sums up how he felt about it too. He was evidently very bitter over his dealings with the US military toward the end of his life, which came prematurely at age 55. I think the Spitfire idea also died with him.That would have saved the gov’t a ton of money with cheap and easy conversions and no spending for new purchases.
Can’t have that happen, the military-industrial complex would not have been happy.
It was in 1967........and it's still not better than an M16.
I first tried surplus UZI mags. The problem with those was the CT9 magazines are actually angled forward slightly in the well, whereas the Uzis are vertical. I had to reverse and rebend the followers, then carefully drill and tap the magazine spine to attach a lug for the Taurus' release lever. They worked ok once you got the follower angle just right, but the whole procedure took a couple of hours per magazine and even then they were tight going in and out.The reloading aspect is one thing that kept me away from the Carbine (as someone else posted, needing "carbide dies and lube..." ), but I'm kinda sorry I didn't rethink that.
Googled up the CT30, and they mentioned 'problems'; a discharge with the trigger guard pushed off to one side was mentioned. Any idea what other issues they had? It really does sound like a great concept.
NightLord, you are a brave man! Aftermarket mags scare me to death, can't imagine cobbled ones. What did you use?
You said the CT9 was heavy, which sometimes happens with blowback guns.
Moon
I have one, and it's a kitten in that big Blackhawk. I love it!Ruger made a Blackhawk in that caliber but I think they discontinued it. As did AMT with an auto pistol.